Abundance of fecal indicator bacteria and diversity of Escherichia coli associated with poultry farms and pasture land cover in streams of northwestern South Carolina

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w
Virginia H. Britt, Min-Ken Liao, Gregory P. Lewis
{"title":"Abundance of fecal indicator bacteria and diversity of Escherichia coli associated with poultry farms and pasture land cover in streams of northwestern South Carolina","authors":"Virginia H. Britt,&nbsp;Min-Ken Liao,&nbsp;Gregory P. Lewis","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Livestock can contribute fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) to waterbodies. However, few studies have examined the relationship between watershed land use or land cover involving livestock production and the genetic diversity of <i>Escherichia coli</i> in freshwater ecosystems. Our major goal was to determine if FIB abundance and <i>E. coli</i> phylogenetic group distributions in headwater streams are related to livestock production in rural watersheds in South Carolina. In both 2017 and 2018, grab samples were collected from streams at summer baseflow. In 2017, we collected samples from watersheds with or without poultry rearing facilities (PRFs). In 2018, we collected samples from streams draining watersheds with mixed forest and pasture cover and from streams in mostly forested watersheds. In both summers, we measured concentrations of total coliforms, <i>E. coli</i>, and <i>Enterococcus</i>. We also categorized <i>E. coli</i> isolates into one of four phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, D). Streams with PRFs in their watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of <i>Enterococcus</i> but not total coliforms or <i>E. coli</i> than streams in watersheds without PRFs. Also, B2 isolates were less frequent and B1 isolates were more frequent in watersheds with PRFs than in those without. Streams draining mixed forest/pasture watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of total coliforms and <i>E. coli</i> but not <i>Enterococcus</i>, as well as higher frequencies of B1 isolates, than streams in mostly forested watersheds. Overall, the most frequent <i>E. coli</i> phylogenetic groups in watersheds with animal production appeared consistent with the phylogenetic groups that are especially abundant in poultry or mammalian livestock feces.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Livestock can contribute fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) to waterbodies. However, few studies have examined the relationship between watershed land use or land cover involving livestock production and the genetic diversity of Escherichia coli in freshwater ecosystems. Our major goal was to determine if FIB abundance and E. coli phylogenetic group distributions in headwater streams are related to livestock production in rural watersheds in South Carolina. In both 2017 and 2018, grab samples were collected from streams at summer baseflow. In 2017, we collected samples from watersheds with or without poultry rearing facilities (PRFs). In 2018, we collected samples from streams draining watersheds with mixed forest and pasture cover and from streams in mostly forested watersheds. In both summers, we measured concentrations of total coliforms, E. coli, and Enterococcus. We also categorized E. coli isolates into one of four phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, D). Streams with PRFs in their watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of Enterococcus but not total coliforms or E. coli than streams in watersheds without PRFs. Also, B2 isolates were less frequent and B1 isolates were more frequent in watersheds with PRFs than in those without. Streams draining mixed forest/pasture watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of total coliforms and E. coli but not Enterococcus, as well as higher frequencies of B1 isolates, than streams in mostly forested watersheds. Overall, the most frequent E. coli phylogenetic groups in watersheds with animal production appeared consistent with the phylogenetic groups that are especially abundant in poultry or mammalian livestock feces.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
期刊最新文献
Laser land leveling technology for paddy production in Vietnam: impact on efficient irrigation and water conservation Analyzing the impact of variations in land use and elevation on selected soil microbial indices and spatial distribution Abundance of fecal indicator bacteria and diversity of Escherichia coli associated with poultry farms and pasture land cover in streams of northwestern South Carolina Application of multivariate statistical techniques in the assessment of long-term surface water quality in Dong Thap Province, Vietnam Interventions of river connectivity and land use on indices of biotic integrity (IBIs) in plain river networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1