Influence of Acuity Circles on Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Interaction of Gender and Race in Liver Transplantation

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1111/ctr.70045
Ahila Manivannan, Anjana Pillai, AnnMarie Liapakis, Neehar D. Parikh, Vineeta Kumar, Elizabeth C. Verna, Reena Salgia, Trueman Wu, Mei Lu, Michelle T. Jesse
{"title":"Influence of Acuity Circles on Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Interaction of Gender and Race in Liver Transplantation","authors":"Ahila Manivannan,&nbsp;Anjana Pillai,&nbsp;AnnMarie Liapakis,&nbsp;Neehar D. Parikh,&nbsp;Vineeta Kumar,&nbsp;Elizabeth C. Verna,&nbsp;Reena Salgia,&nbsp;Trueman Wu,&nbsp;Mei Lu,&nbsp;Michelle T. Jesse","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The impact of liver transplant allocation policy using acuity circles (ACs) on interactions between race and gender on waitlist mortality or receipt of deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) is unknown. Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), we examined adults listed for DDLT from April 3, 2017, to October 4, 2022 (30 months pre- and post-AC). Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model explored AC indicators by race and gender interactions and their effect on receipt of DDLT or waitlist mortality. Also explored was AC's impact on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis and receipt of DDLT or waitlist mortality. 59 592 patients (30 202 pre-AC, 29 390 post-AC) included. For both receipt of DDLT and waitlist mortality, there were no 3-way (AC by race by gender) interactions, indicating that the effects of race and gender on DDLT or waitlist mortality were consistent pre- and post-AC. Irrespective of AC implementation, Black and Hispanic women were less likely to receive DDLT and had an increased risk of waitlist mortality compared to White women. White, Black, and Hispanic men had lower waitlist mortality risk and greater likelihood of receiving DDLT compared to their female race/ethnic counterparts. Patients with HCC had a significantly greater chance for DDLT than non-HCC, although post-AC this effect was attenuated. Patients with HCC were also at greater risk of waitlist mortality pre- and post-AC compared to those without HCC however, the waitlist mortality post-AC was attenuated only for those patients without HCC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show the interaction of gender and race on waitlist mortality and access to transplantation since the implementation of AC, showing continued disparate outcomes for women both within and across racial groups.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of liver transplant allocation policy using acuity circles (ACs) on interactions between race and gender on waitlist mortality or receipt of deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) is unknown. Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), we examined adults listed for DDLT from April 3, 2017, to October 4, 2022 (30 months pre- and post-AC). Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model explored AC indicators by race and gender interactions and their effect on receipt of DDLT or waitlist mortality. Also explored was AC's impact on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis and receipt of DDLT or waitlist mortality. 59 592 patients (30 202 pre-AC, 29 390 post-AC) included. For both receipt of DDLT and waitlist mortality, there were no 3-way (AC by race by gender) interactions, indicating that the effects of race and gender on DDLT or waitlist mortality were consistent pre- and post-AC. Irrespective of AC implementation, Black and Hispanic women were less likely to receive DDLT and had an increased risk of waitlist mortality compared to White women. White, Black, and Hispanic men had lower waitlist mortality risk and greater likelihood of receiving DDLT compared to their female race/ethnic counterparts. Patients with HCC had a significantly greater chance for DDLT than non-HCC, although post-AC this effect was attenuated. Patients with HCC were also at greater risk of waitlist mortality pre- and post-AC compared to those without HCC however, the waitlist mortality post-AC was attenuated only for those patients without HCC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show the interaction of gender and race on waitlist mortality and access to transplantation since the implementation of AC, showing continued disparate outcomes for women both within and across racial groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性眼圈对肝移植中肝细胞癌的影响及性别、种族的相互作用
使用视圆(ACs)的肝移植分配政策对种族和性别对等待名单死亡率或接受已故供体肝移植(DDLT)的相互作用的影响尚不清楚。使用器官共享联合网络(UNOS)的数据,我们检查了2017年4月3日至2022年10月4日(ac前后30个月)登记为DDLT的成年人。细灰色亚分布风险模型通过种族和性别相互作用探讨AC指标及其对DDLT接收或等候名单死亡率的影响。还探讨了AC对肝细胞癌(HCC)诊断和接受DDLT或等候名单死亡率的影响。纳入59592例患者(30202例ac前,29390例ac后)。对于DDLT的接收和候补名单死亡率,没有3-way(种族和性别的AC)相互作用,表明种族和性别对DDLT或候补名单死亡率的影响在AC前后是一致的。无论是否实施AC,与白人妇女相比,黑人和西班牙裔妇女接受DDLT的可能性较小,等待名单死亡率风险增加。与女性相比,白人、黑人和西班牙裔男性的等待名单死亡风险较低,接受DDLT的可能性较大。HCC患者发生DDLT的机会明显高于非HCC患者,尽管ac后这种影响减弱。与没有HCC的患者相比,HCC患者在ac术前和ac后的等候名单死亡率风险也更高。然而,只有那些没有HCC的患者在ac后的等候名单死亡率有所降低。据我们所知,这是自AC实施以来首次显示性别和种族在等待名单死亡率和移植可及性方面的相互作用的研究,显示了种族群体内部和跨种族女性的持续差异结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Flying Kidneys or Flying Donors: What Do Prior Canadian Living Kidney Donors Think? Individual Association of Predicted Left and Right Ventricular Mass Ratios With Survival After Heart Transplantation: A UNOS Database Analysis Liver Transplant Fast-Track With an Emphasis on Reduced Delirium: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Reducing Length of Stay Hybrid Telemedicine and In-Person Care for Kidney Transplant Follow-Up: A Qualitative Study Is Survival Impacted by One or Several Successive Cancers After Liver Transplantation? A French National Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1