Abbas Nasiri Dehsorkhi, Seyed Ahmad Ghanbari, Hassan Makarian, Mohamamd Reza Asgharipour
{"title":"Spatial relationship of weeds with soil properties in wheat field using geostatistical methods","authors":"Abbas Nasiri Dehsorkhi, Seyed Ahmad Ghanbari, Hassan Makarian, Mohamamd Reza Asgharipour","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2024.107055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field experiment was conducted during the agricultural years 2019 and 2020, using a network system with a distance of 2 × 2 m. At each network node, soil, wheat grain yield, seed bank, black grass and wild barley weed density, and biomass were measured. Soil components with high consumption had 0%–55.9% spatial correlation. The association between soil pH and EC was 50.0%–75.2%. The soil texture correlation was 0%–66.5%. The prevalence of black grass and wild barley weeds showed a patchy or clustered dispersion pattern. The kriging interpolated maps also showed a substantial relationship between the first-year seed bank and weed seedling distribution patterns and the second-year weed distribution patterns. Black grass and wild barley weeds were more prevalent in fields with low potassium and soil pH, indicating a spatial connection with soil nitrogen. Wheat grain yield in the field was fragmented, with a 50.2% spatial correlation. In the initial and subsequent years, black grass weed density correlated with grain yield inverse by 81.8% and 78.5%, respectively. Wild barley weed density and grain yield inverse had 53.2% and 63.9% geographical correlations, respectively. The first year's spatial correlation between grain yield and soil nitrogen was 81.6% and the second 80.6%. The association between grain yield and soil phosphorus was 79.4% in the first year and 85.8% in the second. This study suggests that knowing the spatial distribution of soil nutrients and weeds in a field can help determine the best wheat crop management strategy.","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.107055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the agricultural years 2019 and 2020, using a network system with a distance of 2 × 2 m. At each network node, soil, wheat grain yield, seed bank, black grass and wild barley weed density, and biomass were measured. Soil components with high consumption had 0%–55.9% spatial correlation. The association between soil pH and EC was 50.0%–75.2%. The soil texture correlation was 0%–66.5%. The prevalence of black grass and wild barley weeds showed a patchy or clustered dispersion pattern. The kriging interpolated maps also showed a substantial relationship between the first-year seed bank and weed seedling distribution patterns and the second-year weed distribution patterns. Black grass and wild barley weeds were more prevalent in fields with low potassium and soil pH, indicating a spatial connection with soil nitrogen. Wheat grain yield in the field was fragmented, with a 50.2% spatial correlation. In the initial and subsequent years, black grass weed density correlated with grain yield inverse by 81.8% and 78.5%, respectively. Wild barley weed density and grain yield inverse had 53.2% and 63.9% geographical correlations, respectively. The first year's spatial correlation between grain yield and soil nitrogen was 81.6% and the second 80.6%. The association between grain yield and soil phosphorus was 79.4% in the first year and 85.8% in the second. This study suggests that knowing the spatial distribution of soil nutrients and weeds in a field can help determine the best wheat crop management strategy.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.