Soil water repellency of two disturbed soils contaminated with different agricultural microplastics tested under controlled laboratory conditions

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Geoderma Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117124
Železnikar Špela, Drobne Damjana, Hočevar Matej, Noč Matic, Pintar Marina
{"title":"Soil water repellency of two disturbed soils contaminated with different agricultural microplastics tested under controlled laboratory conditions","authors":"Železnikar Špela, Drobne Damjana, Hočevar Matej, Noč Matic, Pintar Marina","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil water repellency (SWR) significantly affects plant growth, along with surface and subsurface hydrology, posing a challenge for agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability. Nowadays, the occurrence of microplastics (MP) in the environment, particularly from agricultural practices, raises concerns about MP impact on soil properties. Among them, SWR is affected by hydrophobicity of MP particles detected in soils. This study introduces a method and presents results of a screening test to assess the effects of MP on SWR, utilizing Water Drop Penetration Time (WDPT) analysis under controlled laboratory conditions in destructed soil samples. We compared SWR of two soil types differing in portion of sand, loam and clay. Soils were mixed with three different types of MP originating from agricultural mulch films: low-density polyethylene (LDPE), biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT), and starch-based biodegradable plastics (Starch). The MP were milled to a uniform size range of some 10 to 300 μm and mixed with the soil samples. WDPT measurements were taken immediately after mixing and recorded for up to 60 s in order to find MP concentration levels at which strongly or more severely water repellency is inducted on soil samples. Our findings reveal that both, soil type and MP type significantly influence SWR, where there are notable differences observed between bio-based (Starch based) and non-bio-based (LDPE and PBAT) plastics’ effects on SWR in the two tested soil types. Data highlights the distinct behaviour of Starch in altering soil hydrophobicity, prominently different from the impact of both PBAT and LDPE. The measurement technique we have developed for quantifying SWR levels could be used for both research applications and the dissemination of findings. It can significantly enhance decision-making processes regarding the selection of optimal plastic alternatives for agricultural use.","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil water repellency (SWR) significantly affects plant growth, along with surface and subsurface hydrology, posing a challenge for agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability. Nowadays, the occurrence of microplastics (MP) in the environment, particularly from agricultural practices, raises concerns about MP impact on soil properties. Among them, SWR is affected by hydrophobicity of MP particles detected in soils. This study introduces a method and presents results of a screening test to assess the effects of MP on SWR, utilizing Water Drop Penetration Time (WDPT) analysis under controlled laboratory conditions in destructed soil samples. We compared SWR of two soil types differing in portion of sand, loam and clay. Soils were mixed with three different types of MP originating from agricultural mulch films: low-density polyethylene (LDPE), biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT), and starch-based biodegradable plastics (Starch). The MP were milled to a uniform size range of some 10 to 300 μm and mixed with the soil samples. WDPT measurements were taken immediately after mixing and recorded for up to 60 s in order to find MP concentration levels at which strongly or more severely water repellency is inducted on soil samples. Our findings reveal that both, soil type and MP type significantly influence SWR, where there are notable differences observed between bio-based (Starch based) and non-bio-based (LDPE and PBAT) plastics’ effects on SWR in the two tested soil types. Data highlights the distinct behaviour of Starch in altering soil hydrophobicity, prominently different from the impact of both PBAT and LDPE. The measurement technique we have developed for quantifying SWR levels could be used for both research applications and the dissemination of findings. It can significantly enhance decision-making processes regarding the selection of optimal plastic alternatives for agricultural use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在控制的实验室条件下,对两种不同农业微塑料污染的扰动土壤的土壤拒水性进行了测试
土壤拒水对植物生长、地表和地下水文产生显著影响,对农业生产力和环境可持续性构成挑战。如今,环境中出现的微塑料(MP),特别是来自农业实践的微塑料,引起了人们对MP对土壤特性影响的关注。其中,SWR受土壤中检测到的MP颗粒的疏水性影响。本研究介绍了一种方法,并介绍了筛选试验的结果,以评估MP对SWR的影响,利用水滴渗透时间(WDPT)分析在受控的实验室条件下破坏的土壤样品。比较了砂、壤土和粘土三种不同土壤类型的SWR。土壤中混合了三种不同类型的来自农业地膜的MP:低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)、可生物降解的聚己二酸丁二酯(PBAT)和淀粉基生物降解塑料(Starch)。MP被磨成10 ~ 300 μm的均匀尺寸,并与土壤样品混合。在混合后立即进行WDPT测量,并记录长达60秒,以便找到对土壤样品产生强烈或更严重的疏水性的MP浓度水平。我们的研究结果表明,土壤类型和MP类型都显著影响SWR,其中生物基(淀粉基)和非生物基(LDPE和PBAT)塑料对两种土壤类型的SWR的影响存在显著差异。数据强调了淀粉在改变土壤疏水性方面的独特行为,与PBAT和LDPE的影响明显不同。我们开发的量化SWR水平的测量技术既可用于研究应用,也可用于传播研究结果。它可以显著提高决策过程中关于选择最佳塑料替代品的农业用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
期刊最新文献
Seasonal soil water origins and determinants in an alpine hillslope on the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Low-severity wildfire prevents catastrophic impacts on fungal communities and soil carbon stability in a fire-affected Douglas-fir ecosystem Thermogravimetric data suggest synergy between different organic fractions and clay in soil structure formation Rhizodeposition stimulates soil carbon decomposition and promotes formation of mineral-associated carbon with increased clay content Mycorrhizal and nutrient controls of carbon sequestration in tropical rainforest soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1