Examining the use of multiple cognitive load measures in evaluating online shopping convenience: an EEG study

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Internet Research Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1108/intr-07-2022-0525
Mahdi Mirhoseini, Pierre-Majorique Léger, Sylvain Sénécal
{"title":"Examining the use of multiple cognitive load measures in evaluating online shopping convenience: an EEG study","authors":"Mahdi Mirhoseini, Pierre-Majorique Léger, Sylvain Sénécal","doi":"10.1108/intr-07-2022-0525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>In the past decade, the use of neurophysiological measures as a complementary source of information has contributed to our understanding of human–computer interaction. However, less attention has been given to their capability in providing measures with high temporal resolution. Two studies are designed to address the challenge of measuring users’ cognitive load in an online shopping environment and investigate how it is related to task difficulty, task uncertainty and shopping convenience.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Two experiments using behavioral and neurophysiological measures are conducted to investigate how various types of the cognitive load construct can be measured and used in an online shopping context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Results of the first study suggest that although all cognitive load measures are influenced by task difficulty, only accumulated load (i.e. total cognitive load experienced during a task) is sensitive to task uncertainty. Results of the second study show that convenience negatively influences accumulated load, and the latter negatively influences user satisfaction.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Our research offers practical value by providing designers with a validated method to measure users’ cognitive load, enabling the identification of usability issues and design improvement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study contributes to the literature by developing a rich and temporally high-resolution measurement of the cognitive load construct and examining how it can inform us about users’ cognitive state in an online shopping environment.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-07-2022-0525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In the past decade, the use of neurophysiological measures as a complementary source of information has contributed to our understanding of human–computer interaction. However, less attention has been given to their capability in providing measures with high temporal resolution. Two studies are designed to address the challenge of measuring users’ cognitive load in an online shopping environment and investigate how it is related to task difficulty, task uncertainty and shopping convenience.

Design/methodology/approach

Two experiments using behavioral and neurophysiological measures are conducted to investigate how various types of the cognitive load construct can be measured and used in an online shopping context.

Findings

Results of the first study suggest that although all cognitive load measures are influenced by task difficulty, only accumulated load (i.e. total cognitive load experienced during a task) is sensitive to task uncertainty. Results of the second study show that convenience negatively influences accumulated load, and the latter negatively influences user satisfaction.

Practical implications

Our research offers practical value by providing designers with a validated method to measure users’ cognitive load, enabling the identification of usability issues and design improvement.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the literature by developing a rich and temporally high-resolution measurement of the cognitive load construct and examining how it can inform us about users’ cognitive state in an online shopping environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检验多重认知负荷测量在评估网上购物便利性中的使用:一项脑电图研究
在过去的十年中,神经生理学测量作为信息的补充来源,有助于我们对人机交互的理解。然而,很少注意到它们提供高时间分辨率测量的能力。两项研究旨在解决在线购物环境中用户认知负荷测量的挑战,并探讨其与任务难度、任务不确定性和购物便利性的关系。设计/方法/方法两个实验使用行为和神经生理学测量来研究如何在网上购物环境中测量和使用不同类型的认知负荷结构。第一项研究的结果表明,尽管所有的认知负荷测量都受到任务难度的影响,但只有累积负荷(即任务期间经历的总认知负荷)对任务不确定性敏感。第二项研究结果显示,便利性负向影响累积负荷,后者负向影响用户满意度。实际意义我们的研究提供了实用价值,为设计师提供了一种有效的方法来测量用户的认知负荷,使可用性问题的识别和设计改进。原创性/价值本研究通过开发一种丰富的、时间上高分辨率的认知负荷结构测量方法,并研究它如何告诉我们在线购物环境中用户的认知状态,从而为文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Research
Internet Research 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This wide-ranging interdisciplinary journal looks at the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the internet. Recent issues have focused on online and mobile gaming, the sharing economy, and the dark side of social media.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking the influence of perceived credibility of guaranteed data destruction service on digital device recycling platform use: the perspective of privacy calculus Visiting and exploring digital transformation management: a bibliometric analysis and review study The impact of emotional expressions on the popularity of discussion threads: evidence from Reddit Analyzing the formation mechanism of self-leadership from the perspective of enterprise social media communication visibility Social media-induced fear of missing out (FoMO) in the workplace: the influence on job burnout and workplace relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1