Environmental and Social Performance, Firm Value, and the Role of Sustainability Committee

IF 4.8 Q1 BUSINESS Business Strategy and Development Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1002/bsd2.70052
Rima Kusuma Rini
{"title":"Environmental and Social Performance, Firm Value, and the Role of Sustainability Committee","authors":"Rima Kusuma Rini","doi":"10.1002/bsd2.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The presence of a specific role, such as a sustainability committee, is crucial for enhancing environmental and social performance and increasing market value. This study aims to examine the direct relationship between sustainability committee to environmental and social performance, as well as between environmental and social performance and firm value to provide additional evidence among mixed findings from previous result. The moderating relationship of the sustainability committee given the significant outcomes in the direct relationship between environmental and social performance and firm value. Using 11 years data in Indonesia, the sustainability committee has positive significant to environmental and social performance. Social performance has positive significant to firm value while environmental does not. Additionally, sustainability committee strengthens the relationship between environmental performance and firm value while social performance is not. These findings portray the importance of sustainability committee to both leverage the environmental and social performance, as well as firm value. The Difference-in-Difference (DiD) analysis reveals that, following POJK No. 51/2017, sustainability committee significantly impacts environmental and social performance and firm value, though with negative way. This distinction result provides additional insight since in short-term the sustainability role still perceived in negative ways. This study contributes to the literature by presence of the role sustainability committee, which no previous studies documented in developing country and difference governance mechanisms such as Indonesia. The limitation of data sustainability committee recommends the future study should consider the role sustainability responsibilities in other committees, identify the characteristics and performance of sustainability committee.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36531,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and Development","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsd2.70052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of a specific role, such as a sustainability committee, is crucial for enhancing environmental and social performance and increasing market value. This study aims to examine the direct relationship between sustainability committee to environmental and social performance, as well as between environmental and social performance and firm value to provide additional evidence among mixed findings from previous result. The moderating relationship of the sustainability committee given the significant outcomes in the direct relationship between environmental and social performance and firm value. Using 11 years data in Indonesia, the sustainability committee has positive significant to environmental and social performance. Social performance has positive significant to firm value while environmental does not. Additionally, sustainability committee strengthens the relationship between environmental performance and firm value while social performance is not. These findings portray the importance of sustainability committee to both leverage the environmental and social performance, as well as firm value. The Difference-in-Difference (DiD) analysis reveals that, following POJK No. 51/2017, sustainability committee significantly impacts environmental and social performance and firm value, though with negative way. This distinction result provides additional insight since in short-term the sustainability role still perceived in negative ways. This study contributes to the literature by presence of the role sustainability committee, which no previous studies documented in developing country and difference governance mechanisms such as Indonesia. The limitation of data sustainability committee recommends the future study should consider the role sustainability responsibilities in other committees, identify the characteristics and performance of sustainability committee.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境和社会绩效、企业价值和可持续发展委员会的作用
设立一个特定的角色,例如可持续发展委员会,对于提高环境和社会绩效以及增加市场价值至关重要。本研究旨在探讨可持续发展委员会与环境和社会绩效之间的直接关系,以及环境和社会绩效与企业价值之间的直接关系,以在先前的研究结果中提供额外的证据。考虑到环境和社会绩效与企业价值之间的直接关系的显著结果,可持续发展委员会的调节关系。使用印尼11年的数据,可持续发展委员会对环境和社会绩效有积极的意义。社会绩效对企业价值有显著的正向影响,而环境绩效对企业价值无显著的正向影响。此外,可持续发展委员会加强了环境绩效与企业价值之间的关系,而社会绩效则没有。这些发现描绘了可持续发展委员会在利用环境和社会绩效以及公司价值方面的重要性。差异中的差异(DiD)分析显示,在POJK No. 51/2017之后,可持续发展委员会对环境和社会绩效以及公司价值产生了显著影响,尽管是负面影响。这一区分结果提供了额外的见解,因为在短期内,可持续性的作用仍然以消极的方式被感知。本研究通过角色可持续性委员会的存在为文献做出了贡献,这在印度尼西亚等发展中国家和不同的治理机制中没有任何研究记录。可持续性委员会数据的局限性建议未来的研究应考虑其他委员会的角色可持续性责任,确定可持续性委员会的特点和绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Business Strategy and Development
Business Strategy and Development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Impact of ESG Disclosures on Corporate Financial Performance: An Industry-Specific Analysis of Indian Firms Correction to “Paradox of Sustainable Growth: The Interplay Between Small and Medium Enterprises and Non-Governmental Organizations and Government Helix” Significance of Industry 4.0 in Achieving Sustainable Performance Across Supply Chains—A Research Perspective The Impact of the Institutional Quality on the Development of Sustainable Innovation: A Multilevel Analysis Sustainable Equity Index Dynamic: Connectedness and Information Asymmetry in Emerging Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1