Hand Hygiene Knowledge and Hand Dirtiness Assessment to Inform Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Appropriateness in Community Settings in Uganda and Kenya.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Pub Date : 2024-12-03 Print Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.24-0124
Christiana Hug, Evelyn Makena Mugambi, Maureen Kesande, Caroline Pratt, Lorna Maru, Raymond Odinoh, Fred Tusabe, Matthew J Lozier, Victoria Trinies, Graeme Prentice-Mott, Alexandra Medley, Alexandra Kossik, Isaac Ngere, M Kariuki Njenga, Mohammed Lamorde, David Berendes
{"title":"Hand Hygiene Knowledge and Hand Dirtiness Assessment to Inform Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Appropriateness in Community Settings in Uganda and Kenya.","authors":"Christiana Hug, Evelyn Makena Mugambi, Maureen Kesande, Caroline Pratt, Lorna Maru, Raymond Odinoh, Fred Tusabe, Matthew J Lozier, Victoria Trinies, Graeme Prentice-Mott, Alexandra Medley, Alexandra Kossik, Isaac Ngere, M Kariuki Njenga, Mohammed Lamorde, David Berendes","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) availability and use increased as a prevention measure. ABHR is a convenient, effective way to kill microbes on hands but is hampered by the presence of organic material, whereas handwashing with water and soap (HWWS) can physically remove microbes and dirt. Although ABHR is preferred in most health care settings, the suitability of ABHR use in community settings has not been measured. We compared characteristics between community members and health care personnel (HCP) to inform considerations for promoting ABHR in community settings. We included data from community locations and health care facilities in Kenya and Uganda collected between 2021 and 2022. Hand dirtiness swabs were measured using the Quantitative Personal Hygiene Assessment Tool (qPHAT), a visual scale where 0 is very visibly dirty and 10 is no visible dirt. Participants were also asked about the appropriate method to use when hands were visibly dirty. Hand swabs were collected from HCP and community members. Both groups had median qPHAT scores of five. Neither the adjusted odds of having a qPHAT score less than or equal to five (1.4, 95% CI: 0.8-2.2) nor the adjusted odds of responding correctly to the knowledge question (0.8, 95% CI: 0.4-1.4) differed significantly by setting. People in community settings may, therefore, have comparable hand dirtiness and knowledge of appropriate hand hygiene practices to use ABHR as a HWWS complement. Further investigation into guidance and use of supportive messaging should be considered as completed elsewhere.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"441-450"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) availability and use increased as a prevention measure. ABHR is a convenient, effective way to kill microbes on hands but is hampered by the presence of organic material, whereas handwashing with water and soap (HWWS) can physically remove microbes and dirt. Although ABHR is preferred in most health care settings, the suitability of ABHR use in community settings has not been measured. We compared characteristics between community members and health care personnel (HCP) to inform considerations for promoting ABHR in community settings. We included data from community locations and health care facilities in Kenya and Uganda collected between 2021 and 2022. Hand dirtiness swabs were measured using the Quantitative Personal Hygiene Assessment Tool (qPHAT), a visual scale where 0 is very visibly dirty and 10 is no visible dirt. Participants were also asked about the appropriate method to use when hands were visibly dirty. Hand swabs were collected from HCP and community members. Both groups had median qPHAT scores of five. Neither the adjusted odds of having a qPHAT score less than or equal to five (1.4, 95% CI: 0.8-2.2) nor the adjusted odds of responding correctly to the knowledge question (0.8, 95% CI: 0.4-1.4) differed significantly by setting. People in community settings may, therefore, have comparable hand dirtiness and knowledge of appropriate hand hygiene practices to use ABHR as a HWWS complement. Further investigation into guidance and use of supportive messaging should be considered as completed elsewhere.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌干达和肯尼亚社区环境中以酒精为基础的搓手方法的手卫生知识和手脏评估
在2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间,酒精洗手液(ABHR)作为一种预防措施的可获得性和使用量有所增加。ABHR是一种方便、有效的杀死手上微生物的方法,但受到有机物质存在的阻碍,而用水和肥皂洗手(HWWS)可以物理地去除微生物和污垢。虽然在大多数卫生保健机构中首选ABHR,但在社区环境中使用ABHR的适宜性尚未得到衡量。我们比较了社区成员和卫生保健人员(HCP)的特征,以告知在社区环境中促进ABHR的考虑因素。我们纳入了2021年至2022年间从肯尼亚和乌干达的社区地点和医疗机构收集的数据。使用定量个人卫生评估工具(qPHAT)测量手脏拭子,这是一种视觉尺度,0表示非常明显脏,10表示没有可见脏。参与者还被问及当手明显脏时该如何使用。收集了HCP和社区成员的手拭子。两组的qPHAT平均得分均为5分。qPHAT得分小于或等于5分的调整几率(1.4,95% CI: 0.8-2.2)和正确回答知识问题的调整几率(0.8,95% CI: 0.4-1.4)都没有因设置而显著差异。因此,在社区环境中,人们可能有相当的手脏和适当的手卫生习惯知识,以使用ABHR作为HWWS的补充。应认为对指导和使用支助性信息的进一步调查已在其他地方完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine. The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development. The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal. Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries
期刊最新文献
Subclinical Leptospiral Infections and Antibody Waning During Pregnancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study from Rural Sri Lanka. COVID-19 in Villages of the Peruvian Amazon: A Survey of Local Public Health Beliefs and Behaviors. Fifteen-Year Evolution of Chronic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Mimicking Other Dermatoses. Bilateral Necrotic Foot Lesions of Kaposi Sarcoma in a Man from Ecuador. Interrater Reliability of Electroencephalogram Interpretations in Febrile Comatose African Children: Implications for Automated Interpretation Algorithm Creation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1