Outcomes of Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16490-4
Maurits R Visser, Daan M Voeten, Suzanne S Gisbertz, Jelle P Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
{"title":"Outcomes of Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit.","authors":"Maurits R Visser, Daan M Voeten, Suzanne S Gisbertz, Jelle P Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16490-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Salvage esophagectomy is more complex and associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality than standard resection. This study aimed to investigate short-term outcomes and the influence of hospital volume on these outcomes of salvage surgery for esophageal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled all patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) between 2012 and 2022. The patients were classified as salvage or non-salvage by registering surgeons. Salvage surgery is defined in the DUCA as surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative mortality (30-day/in-hospital) and morbidity were compared between the salvage and non-salvage patients using multilevel logistic regression analyses. Hospital variation in the use of salvage esophagectomy was investigated using funnel plots. The influence of hospital volume (≤ 40 to > 40 cases) and salvage volume (< 6 to ≥ 6 cases) on outcomes for salvage patients were investigated. Using backward elimination, relevant baseline characteristics influencing salvage outcomes were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2012 and 2022, 7749 patients underwent esophagectomy, 251 (3%) of whom underwent salvage resection, varying from 0 to 8% between centers. Severe complications (43% vs 28%; odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.34) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (11% vs 3%; OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.38-5.61) were higher after salvage surgery than after non-salvage surgery. Salvage patients treated in high-volume centers had a lower risk of 30-day/in-hospital mortality than those treated in low-volume centers (9% vs 19%; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.99), with no relation between salvage volume and outcome. Male sex, older age (> 75 years), and squamous cell carcinoma were associated with worse short-term outcomes of salvage surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Salvage surgery is associated with worse short-term outcomes than non-salvage esophagectomy. Outcomes after salvage surgery were favorable in high-volume esophagectomy centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2687-2697"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16490-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Salvage esophagectomy is more complex and associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality than standard resection. This study aimed to investigate short-term outcomes and the influence of hospital volume on these outcomes of salvage surgery for esophageal cancer.

Methods: The study enrolled all patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) between 2012 and 2022. The patients were classified as salvage or non-salvage by registering surgeons. Salvage surgery is defined in the DUCA as surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative mortality (30-day/in-hospital) and morbidity were compared between the salvage and non-salvage patients using multilevel logistic regression analyses. Hospital variation in the use of salvage esophagectomy was investigated using funnel plots. The influence of hospital volume (≤ 40 to > 40 cases) and salvage volume (< 6 to ≥ 6 cases) on outcomes for salvage patients were investigated. Using backward elimination, relevant baseline characteristics influencing salvage outcomes were identified.

Results: Between 2012 and 2022, 7749 patients underwent esophagectomy, 251 (3%) of whom underwent salvage resection, varying from 0 to 8% between centers. Severe complications (43% vs 28%; odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.34) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (11% vs 3%; OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.38-5.61) were higher after salvage surgery than after non-salvage surgery. Salvage patients treated in high-volume centers had a lower risk of 30-day/in-hospital mortality than those treated in low-volume centers (9% vs 19%; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.99), with no relation between salvage volume and outcome. Male sex, older age (> 75 years), and squamous cell carcinoma were associated with worse short-term outcomes of salvage surgery.

Conclusions: Salvage surgery is associated with worse short-term outcomes than non-salvage esophagectomy. Outcomes after salvage surgery were favorable in high-volume esophagectomy centers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食管癌救助性手术的结果:来自荷兰上消化道肿瘤审计的一项全国性队列研究。
背景:补救性食管切除术比标准切除术更复杂,术后发病率和死亡率更高。本研究旨在探讨食管癌抢救手术的短期预后及医院容积对这些预后的影响。方法:该研究纳入了2012年至2022年期间在荷兰上消化道癌症审计(DUCA)中登记的所有食管癌患者。通过注册外科医生将患者分为抢救型和非抢救型。补救性手术在DUCA中被定义为明确放化疗后的手术。采用多水平logistic回归分析比较抢救和非抢救患者的术后死亡率(30天/住院)和发病率。采用漏斗图调查医院使用补救性食管切除术的差异。探讨医院容积(≤40 ~ 4040例)和抢救容积(< 6 ~≥6例)对抢救患者预后的影响。使用反向消去法,确定了影响救助结果的相关基线特征。结果:2012年至2022年期间,7749例患者接受了食管切除术,251例(3%)患者接受了补救性切除术,各中心之间的差异从0%到8%不等。严重并发症(43% vs 28%);优势比[OR], 1.81;95%可信区间[CI], 1.40-2.34)和30天/住院死亡率(11% vs 3%;或者,3.65;95% CI, 2.38-5.61)抢救性手术后高于非抢救性手术后。在大容量中心治疗的抢救性患者的30天/住院死亡率风险低于在小容量中心治疗的患者(9% vs 19%;或者,0.42;95% CI, 0.18-0.99),挽救量与结果无关。男性、年龄较大(≥75岁)和鳞状细胞癌与抢救手术的短期预后较差相关。结论:补救性手术与非补救性食管切除术相比,短期预后更差。在大容量食管切除术中心,挽救性手术后的结果是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
期刊最新文献
ASO Visual Abstract: Are Positive Biopsy Margins in Melanoma Significant? A Cohort Study of Micro- Versus Macroscopic Margin Status and Their Impact on Residual Disease and Survival. ASO Visual Abstract: Negative Impact of Systemic Therapy on Survival in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Low-Grade Metastatic Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma. ASO Visual Abstract: Effect of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy on Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy for Gastric Cancer. ASO Visual Abstract: Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces Predicts Survival in Resected Pulmonary Lymphoepithelial Carcinoma. ASO Visual Abstract: Impact of Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing with Expanded Eligibility for Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients in a Large Integrated Health System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1