Long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of T-and protrusion technique with ultrathin strut drug eluting stents.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Future cardiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1080/14796678.2024.2435205
Csaba A Dézsi, Judit Andréka, Amer M Sayour, Mónika Deák, Veronika Szentes, Zoltán Sebők, Zsolt Fi, Alexandru Achim, Zoltán Ruzsa
{"title":"Long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of T-and protrusion technique with ultrathin strut drug eluting stents.","authors":"Csaba A Dézsi, Judit Andréka, Amer M Sayour, Mónika Deák, Veronika Szentes, Zoltán Sebők, Zsolt Fi, Alexandru Achim, Zoltán Ruzsa","doi":"10.1080/14796678.2024.2435205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Data about coronary bifurcations treated with ultrathin strut drug-eluting stents (DES) using T-and-protrusion (TAP) technique is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, a total of 84 consecutive patients, who underwent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with TAP technique using Orsiro® DES (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany), were included. All pre- and post-procedural data, as well as 1- and 2-year follow-up angiograms, were analyzed. Primary endpoints were procedural success and target lesion failure (TLF); secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Procedural success was achieved in 100% of cases. TLF rate was higher in patients presented with acute coronary syndrome compared to the ones with chronic coronary syndrome (19% vs. 5% <i>p</i> = 0.09). All-cause mortality was 30% during follow-up, from which 26% was due to non-cardiovascular cause, and the MACCE rate was 46%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coronary bifurcations treated with ultrathin strut DES showed good short-term results and were associated with acceptable cardiovascular mortality. However, in these long-term patients, the rate of MACCE and non-cardiovascular death were rather high.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"837-842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2024.2435205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Data about coronary bifurcations treated with ultrathin strut drug-eluting stents (DES) using T-and-protrusion (TAP) technique is limited.

Methods: In this study, a total of 84 consecutive patients, who underwent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with TAP technique using Orsiro® DES (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany), were included. All pre- and post-procedural data, as well as 1- and 2-year follow-up angiograms, were analyzed. Primary endpoints were procedural success and target lesion failure (TLF); secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) during follow-up.

Results: Procedural success was achieved in 100% of cases. TLF rate was higher in patients presented with acute coronary syndrome compared to the ones with chronic coronary syndrome (19% vs. 5% p = 0.09). All-cause mortality was 30% during follow-up, from which 26% was due to non-cardiovascular cause, and the MACCE rate was 46%.

Conclusions: Coronary bifurcations treated with ultrathin strut DES showed good short-term results and were associated with acceptable cardiovascular mortality. However, in these long-term patients, the rate of MACCE and non-cardiovascular death were rather high.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
t -突出技术与超薄支撑物药物洗脱支架的长期临床和血管造影结果。
目的:超薄支架药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗冠状动脉分叉的数据有限。方法:在本研究中,共纳入84例连续使用Orsiro®DES (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany)采用TAP技术行分岔经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者。分析所有术前和术后数据,以及1年和2年随访血管造影。主要终点是手术成功和靶病变失败(TLF);次要终点是随访期间的全因死亡率和主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)。结果:手术成功率100%。急性冠脉综合征患者的TLF率高于慢性冠脉综合征患者(19% vs. 5% p = 0.09)。随访期间全因死亡率为30%,其中26%为非心血管原因,MACCE率为46%。结论:超薄支架DES治疗冠状动脉分叉具有良好的短期效果,并与可接受的心血管死亡率相关。然而,在这些长期患者中,MACCE和非心血管死亡率相当高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future cardiology
Future cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.
期刊最新文献
Validation of novel predictors for early detection of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction. From Salvador Dali and Von Gogh to BRASH: a case-based systematic literature review of digoxin induced BRASH syndrome. Reconsidering the role of beta-blockers in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction. The effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The role of single-pill ACE inhibitor/ccb combination for hypertension: an Algerian view via the nominal group technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1