A Retrospective Study on the Continuation of Buprenorphine in the Perioperative Setting.

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Hospital Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1177/00185787241301348
Morgan Lynn Dermody, Sandra Lemon, Lisa Kingdon, Laura Ruekert
{"title":"A Retrospective Study on the Continuation of Buprenorphine in the Perioperative Setting.","authors":"Morgan Lynn Dermody, Sandra Lemon, Lisa Kingdon, Laura Ruekert","doi":"10.1177/00185787241301348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Aims:</b> The purpose of this study is to review the 2020 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Guideline for Opioid Use Disorder recommendations to continue buprenorphine perioperatively by evaluating the total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) requirements in the first 24 hours postoperatively of patients who continued their buprenorphine therapy to those who discontinued their buprenorphine therapy perioperatively. <b>Methods:</b> This IRB approved study is a multicenter retrospective chart review of 80 surgical inpatients on buprenorphine prior to admission at participating sites from January 2015 to October 2022. The primary outcome is MME administered 24 hours postoperatively in patients who continued buprenorphine perioperatively versus those who discontinued buprenorphine perioperatively. Secondary efficacy outcomes included MME administered 48 and 72 hours postoperatively and daily average pain scores. Safety outcomes included rate of respiratory depression and mortality. <b>Findings:</b> Patients who continued buprenorphine perioperatively required significantly less MME in the first 24 hours postoperatively compared to those who discontinued buprenorphine perioperatively (median [IQR]; 23.25 [6-74.35] vs 93.38 [49.8-156.26]; <i>P</i> < .001). Secondary outcomes of MME administered at 48 hours (10.4 [0-40.5] vs 66.15 [27.94-143.5], <i>P</i> < .001) and 72 hours (0 [0-31.13] vs 66 [22.5-144], <i>P</i> < .001) postoperatively were also significantly less in those whose buprenorphine was continued versus those whose buprenorphine was discontinued perioperatively. Patients whose buprenorphine was continued perioperatively experienced significantly lower average pain scores at 48 (median [IQR]; 4.74 [2.9-7.08] vs 6 [4.93-7.4], <i>P</i> = .028) and 72 hours (3.78 [1.78-5.85] vs 5.75 [4.15-7.45], <i>P</i> = .002) postoperatively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Continuation of buprenorphine in the perioperative setting results in significantly lower utilization of MME in patients whose buprenorphine is continued compared to those whose buprenorphine is discontinued perioperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"00185787241301348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787241301348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: The purpose of this study is to review the 2020 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Guideline for Opioid Use Disorder recommendations to continue buprenorphine perioperatively by evaluating the total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) requirements in the first 24 hours postoperatively of patients who continued their buprenorphine therapy to those who discontinued their buprenorphine therapy perioperatively. Methods: This IRB approved study is a multicenter retrospective chart review of 80 surgical inpatients on buprenorphine prior to admission at participating sites from January 2015 to October 2022. The primary outcome is MME administered 24 hours postoperatively in patients who continued buprenorphine perioperatively versus those who discontinued buprenorphine perioperatively. Secondary efficacy outcomes included MME administered 48 and 72 hours postoperatively and daily average pain scores. Safety outcomes included rate of respiratory depression and mortality. Findings: Patients who continued buprenorphine perioperatively required significantly less MME in the first 24 hours postoperatively compared to those who discontinued buprenorphine perioperatively (median [IQR]; 23.25 [6-74.35] vs 93.38 [49.8-156.26]; P < .001). Secondary outcomes of MME administered at 48 hours (10.4 [0-40.5] vs 66.15 [27.94-143.5], P < .001) and 72 hours (0 [0-31.13] vs 66 [22.5-144], P < .001) postoperatively were also significantly less in those whose buprenorphine was continued versus those whose buprenorphine was discontinued perioperatively. Patients whose buprenorphine was continued perioperatively experienced significantly lower average pain scores at 48 (median [IQR]; 4.74 [2.9-7.08] vs 6 [4.93-7.4], P = .028) and 72 hours (3.78 [1.78-5.85] vs 5.75 [4.15-7.45], P = .002) postoperatively. Conclusion: Continuation of buprenorphine in the perioperative setting results in significantly lower utilization of MME in patients whose buprenorphine is continued compared to those whose buprenorphine is discontinued perioperatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丁丙诺啡在围手术期继续应用的回顾性研究。
背景和目的:本研究的目的是通过评估继续丁丙诺啡治疗和停止丁丙诺啡治疗的患者术后最初24小时的总吗啡毫克当量(MME)需求,来回顾2020年药物滥用和精神卫生服务管理局阿片类药物使用障碍指南中关于继续丁丙诺啡围手术期的建议。方法:这项经IRB批准的研究是一项多中心回顾性研究,回顾了2015年1月至2022年10月参与研究的80例入院前使用丁丙诺啡的外科住院患者。主要结果是围手术期继续使用丁丙诺啡的患者与围手术期停用丁丙诺啡的患者术后24小时给予MME。次要疗效结果包括术后48和72小时给予MME和每日平均疼痛评分。安全性指标包括呼吸抑制率和死亡率。结果:与围手术期停用丁丙诺啡的患者相比,围手术期继续使用丁丙诺啡的患者术后24小时内所需的MME显著减少(中位数[IQR];23.25 [6-74.35] vs 93.38 [49.8-156.26];P P P P = .028)和72小时(3.78(1.78 - -5.85)和5.75 (4.15 - -7.45),P = .002)术后。结论:与围手术期停用丁丙诺啡的患者相比,继续使用丁丙诺啡的患者MME使用率明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
期刊最新文献
Rhizobium radiobacter Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis - A Case Report and Literature Analysis. Enoxaparin Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Dosing in Critically Ill Underweight Patients. Axatilimab. A Cost Analysis of Opioid/Acetaminophen Therapy Versus a Multidrug, Opioid-Free Multimodal Postoperative Pain Control Regimen. Ensuring the Safety of Locally Sourced Alcohols for Hand Sanitizer Production During the SARS-CoV-2 Crisis: A Comprehensive Impurity Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1