How Do the Determinants of Collaborative Consumption Influence Its Use in Healthcare? A Managerial Perspective.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Health Policy and Management Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.8453
Luigi Piper, Lucrezia Maria de Cosmo, Marco Benvenuto, Carmine Viola
{"title":"How Do the Determinants of Collaborative Consumption Influence Its Use in Healthcare? A Managerial Perspective.","authors":"Luigi Piper, Lucrezia Maria de Cosmo, Marco Benvenuto, Carmine Viola","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.8453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary objective of this investigation is to scrutinize the underlying motivations that may prompt those responsible for health to adopt models of collaborative consumption (CC) as business innovation. Furthermore, the study seeks to assess the congruence of determinants influencing the intention to utilize CC in healthcare, comparing perspectives between responsible for health and digital health consumers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two studies based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) have been conducted. Study 1 uses a qualitative approach to analyze the determinants in use CC in healthcare of responsible for health of the Italian's National Health Service. Study 2 uses a quantitative approach to analyze a sample of healthcare consumers, their salient beliefs, digital health literacy, and perceived own health status in determining the intention to use CC in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responsible for health recognize both the benefits, like improved efficiency, and the drawbacks, such as digital illiteracy and privacy concerns. Consumer data reveals that attitudes, social norms, perceived control, and digital literacy significantly influence the intention to use CC in healthcare, with education and age being moderating factors, whereas income is not impactful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The research ends with a discussion of these findings and their strategic implications for managing decision support systems in healthcare. The research highlights the need for innovation-based strategies in the health system, proposing a new socio-technical health domain to improve management through a participatory approach. The approach emphasizes business innovation, service quality, and cost-efficiency. Finally, the research addresses the gaps highlighted in CC in healthcare adoption, underscoring public-private collaboration and practical strategies for sustainable success.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":"13 ","pages":"8453"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary objective of this investigation is to scrutinize the underlying motivations that may prompt those responsible for health to adopt models of collaborative consumption (CC) as business innovation. Furthermore, the study seeks to assess the congruence of determinants influencing the intention to utilize CC in healthcare, comparing perspectives between responsible for health and digital health consumers.

Methods: Two studies based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) have been conducted. Study 1 uses a qualitative approach to analyze the determinants in use CC in healthcare of responsible for health of the Italian's National Health Service. Study 2 uses a quantitative approach to analyze a sample of healthcare consumers, their salient beliefs, digital health literacy, and perceived own health status in determining the intention to use CC in healthcare.

Results: Responsible for health recognize both the benefits, like improved efficiency, and the drawbacks, such as digital illiteracy and privacy concerns. Consumer data reveals that attitudes, social norms, perceived control, and digital literacy significantly influence the intention to use CC in healthcare, with education and age being moderating factors, whereas income is not impactful.

Conclusion: The research ends with a discussion of these findings and their strategic implications for managing decision support systems in healthcare. The research highlights the need for innovation-based strategies in the health system, proposing a new socio-technical health domain to improve management through a participatory approach. The approach emphasizes business innovation, service quality, and cost-efficiency. Finally, the research addresses the gaps highlighted in CC in healthcare adoption, underscoring public-private collaboration and practical strategies for sustainable success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协同消费的决定因素如何影响其在医疗保健中的使用?管理视角。
背景:本调查的主要目的是仔细检查可能促使那些负责健康的人采用协作消费(CC)模式作为商业创新的潜在动机。此外,本研究旨在评估影响在医疗保健中使用CC的意愿的决定因素的一致性,比较负责健康和数字健康消费者之间的观点。方法:基于计划行为理论(TPB)进行两项研究。研究1使用定性方法分析在意大利国家卫生服务机构负责健康的医疗保健中使用CC的决定因素。研究2使用定量方法来分析医疗保健消费者样本,他们的突出信念,数字健康素养和感知自己的健康状况,以确定在医疗保健中使用CC的意图。结果:对健康负责的人认识到它的好处,比如提高效率,也认识到它的缺点,比如数字文盲和隐私问题。消费者数据显示,态度、社会规范、感知控制和数字素养显著影响在医疗保健中使用CC的意愿,教育和年龄是调节因素,而收入没有影响。结论:研究结束讨论这些发现和他们的战略意义管理决策支持系统在医疗保健。该研究强调了在卫生系统中需要基于创新的战略,提出了一个新的社会技术卫生领域,以通过参与式方法改善管理。这种方法强调业务创新、服务质量和成本效益。最后,该研究解决了CC在医疗保健采用方面突出的差距,强调了公私合作和可持续成功的实际战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Research Coproduction in Uganda Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact". How Does Management Matter for Hospital Performance? Evidence From the Global Hospital Management Survey in China. Impact of the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Payment Reform on Provider Behavior in China: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Study. Identifying Positive Practices to Institutionalize Social Innovation in the Malawian Health System. Coopetition Strategy in the Healthcare: Good or Bad?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1