Identifying Positive Practices to Institutionalize Social Innovation in the Malawian Health System.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Health Policy and Management Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.8141
Lindi van Niekerk, Lenore Manderson, Nedson Fosiko, Andrew Likaka, Carla Pamela Blauvelt, Barwani Msiska, Susan Rifkin
{"title":"Identifying Positive Practices to Institutionalize Social Innovation in the Malawian Health System.","authors":"Lindi van Niekerk, Lenore Manderson, Nedson Fosiko, Andrew Likaka, Carla Pamela Blauvelt, Barwani Msiska, Susan Rifkin","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.8141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Governments worldwide are increasingly interested in scaling up effective public health innovations, but it is not always easy to institutionalize innovations, arising outside the public health system, as a part of national delivery. Evidence on how country governments can practically achieve this is limited. This article describes the institutionalization of the Chipatala Cha Pa Foni (CCPF, Health Center by Phone) social innovation into the Malawian public health, and identifies positive institutional practices that local actors drew on to achieve this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A positive-oriented interdisciplinary multi-method qualitative case study design was adopted. Data were collected from key informant interviews, observations, and documents over 18 months. A composite social innovation framework, informed by institutional theory and positive organizational scholarship, guided the thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four clusters of positive institutional practices aided the institutionalization of the innovation: building high-quality relationships; creating opportunities for experiential interaction; cultivating hope; and logic attunement and awareness. We describe how these four practices operated together as a process of 'everyday creativity' to achieve institutionalization. We illustrate the importance of high-quality relationships, marked by respect, mutuality, and appreciation, as the foundation upon which hope can be built and the creativity needed for institutionalization to flourish. National ownership and sustainability of innovations are enhanced when implementation and institutionalization approaches are attuned to the logics inherent in national identity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this article, we highlight the importance of institutional and interpersonal dynamics in the institutionalization of social innovation in health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Governments worldwide are increasingly interested in scaling up effective public health innovations, but it is not always easy to institutionalize innovations, arising outside the public health system, as a part of national delivery. Evidence on how country governments can practically achieve this is limited. This article describes the institutionalization of the Chipatala Cha Pa Foni (CCPF, Health Center by Phone) social innovation into the Malawian public health, and identifies positive institutional practices that local actors drew on to achieve this.

Methods: A positive-oriented interdisciplinary multi-method qualitative case study design was adopted. Data were collected from key informant interviews, observations, and documents over 18 months. A composite social innovation framework, informed by institutional theory and positive organizational scholarship, guided the thematic content analysis.

Results: Four clusters of positive institutional practices aided the institutionalization of the innovation: building high-quality relationships; creating opportunities for experiential interaction; cultivating hope; and logic attunement and awareness. We describe how these four practices operated together as a process of 'everyday creativity' to achieve institutionalization. We illustrate the importance of high-quality relationships, marked by respect, mutuality, and appreciation, as the foundation upon which hope can be built and the creativity needed for institutionalization to flourish. National ownership and sustainability of innovations are enhanced when implementation and institutionalization approaches are attuned to the logics inherent in national identity.

Conclusion: In this article, we highlight the importance of institutional and interpersonal dynamics in the institutionalization of social innovation in health systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定积极的做法,使马拉维卫生系统的社会创新制度化。
背景:世界各国政府对扩大有效的公共卫生创新越来越感兴趣,但将公共卫生系统之外产生的创新作为国家服务的一部分制度化并不总是那么容易。关于各国政府如何切实实现这一目标的证据有限。本文描述了将Chipatala Cha Pa Foni (CCPF,电话保健中心)社会创新纳入马拉维公共卫生的制度化,并确定了当地行动者为实现这一目标所借鉴的积极的制度做法。方法:采用积极导向的跨学科多方法定性案例研究设计。数据收集自18个月来的主要信息提供者访谈、观察和文件。在制度理论和积极的组织学术的指导下,一个复合的社会创新框架指导了主题内容分析。结果:四组积极的制度实践有助于创新的制度化:建立高质量的关系;创造体验互动的机会;培养希望;还有逻辑调谐和意识。我们描述了这四种实践如何作为“日常创造力”的过程一起运作,以实现制度化。我们阐明了高质量关系的重要性,这种关系以尊重、互惠和欣赏为标志,是建立希望的基础,也是制度化蓬勃发展所需的创造力的基础。当实施和制度化方法与国家认同的内在逻辑相协调时,国家所有权和创新的可持续性就会得到加强。结论:在本文中,我们强调了制度和人际动态在卫生系统社会创新制度化中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Research Coproduction in Uganda Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact". How Does Management Matter for Hospital Performance? Evidence From the Global Hospital Management Survey in China. Impact of the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Payment Reform on Provider Behavior in China: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Study. Identifying Positive Practices to Institutionalize Social Innovation in the Malawian Health System. Coopetition Strategy in the Healthcare: Good or Bad?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1