Efficacy of a thermoplastic mask and pneumatic abdominal compression device for immobilization in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of spine metastases

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/acm2.14577
Yohan A. Walter, Daniel B. Speir, William E. Burrell, Chiachien J. Wang, Hsinshun T. Wu
{"title":"Efficacy of a thermoplastic mask and pneumatic abdominal compression device for immobilization in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of spine metastases","authors":"Yohan A. Walter,&nbsp;Daniel B. Speir,&nbsp;William E. Burrell,&nbsp;Chiachien J. Wang,&nbsp;Hsinshun T. Wu","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become a key technique in management of spine metastases. With improved control over treatment plan dosimetry, there is a greater need for accurate patient positioning to guarantee agreement between the treatment plan and delivered dose. With serious potential complications such as fracture and myelopathy, the margins of error in SABR of the spine are minimal. In this study, we assessed the performance of two patient immobilization setups in SABR for spinal metastases. First, a Type-S head and shoulders mask (CQ Medical, Avondale, PA), and second, the BPL1 setup, which includes a wing board, vacuum bag, and the Respiratory Belt for the Body Pro-Lok ONE (CQ Medical, Avondale, PA). Immobilization was assessed using image-guided intrafraction repositioning shifts. Required planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated based on repositioning data for 172 treated fractions using 2 standard deviation (2SD) and analytic approaches. Overall, 91.7% and 74.1% of fractions treated had total 3D repositioning shifts ≤3.0 mm using the Type-S and BPL1 setups, respectively. In the thoracic spine, 43.2% and 46.5% of fractions had shifts ≤1.5 mm for the respective setups. Suggested margins were under 3.5 mm in all directions and use cases. In the posterior-anterior direction, the BPL1 setup had a 0.6 mm smaller suggested margin for the thoracic spine compared to the Type-S setup, at 1.4 mm, calculated using the analytic approach. Both the Type-S and BPL1 setups are effective for immobilization in spine SABR. The Type-S demonstrated superior immobilization in the upper spine and remains the clinical standard for cervical and upper thoracic spine positioning. The BPL1 setup showed effective immobilization in use cases treating the mid-to lower thoracic spine and lumbar spine and remains our clinical standard for those use cases. Results additionally demonstrate feasibility of potential PTV margin reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.14577","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14577","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become a key technique in management of spine metastases. With improved control over treatment plan dosimetry, there is a greater need for accurate patient positioning to guarantee agreement between the treatment plan and delivered dose. With serious potential complications such as fracture and myelopathy, the margins of error in SABR of the spine are minimal. In this study, we assessed the performance of two patient immobilization setups in SABR for spinal metastases. First, a Type-S head and shoulders mask (CQ Medical, Avondale, PA), and second, the BPL1 setup, which includes a wing board, vacuum bag, and the Respiratory Belt for the Body Pro-Lok ONE (CQ Medical, Avondale, PA). Immobilization was assessed using image-guided intrafraction repositioning shifts. Required planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated based on repositioning data for 172 treated fractions using 2 standard deviation (2SD) and analytic approaches. Overall, 91.7% and 74.1% of fractions treated had total 3D repositioning shifts ≤3.0 mm using the Type-S and BPL1 setups, respectively. In the thoracic spine, 43.2% and 46.5% of fractions had shifts ≤1.5 mm for the respective setups. Suggested margins were under 3.5 mm in all directions and use cases. In the posterior-anterior direction, the BPL1 setup had a 0.6 mm smaller suggested margin for the thoracic spine compared to the Type-S setup, at 1.4 mm, calculated using the analytic approach. Both the Type-S and BPL1 setups are effective for immobilization in spine SABR. The Type-S demonstrated superior immobilization in the upper spine and remains the clinical standard for cervical and upper thoracic spine positioning. The BPL1 setup showed effective immobilization in use cases treating the mid-to lower thoracic spine and lumbar spine and remains our clinical standard for those use cases. Results additionally demonstrate feasibility of potential PTV margin reduction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热塑性面罩和气动腹部压缩装置在脊柱转移性立体定向消融放疗中固定的疗效。
立体定向消融放疗(SABR)已成为治疗脊柱转移瘤的一项关键技术。随着对治疗计划剂量学控制的改进,更需要准确的患者定位,以保证治疗计划和给药剂量之间的一致性。对于严重的潜在并发症,如骨折和脊髓病,脊柱SABR的误差范围很小。在这项研究中,我们评估了SABR中两种患者固定装置治疗脊柱转移的效果。首先,s型头肩面罩(CQ Medical, Avondale, PA),其次,BPL1设置,其中包括翼板,真空袋和身体Pro-Lok ONE的呼吸带(CQ Medical, Avondale, PA)。使用图像引导的眼球内定位移位来评估固定。所需的计划目标体积(PTV)边际是基于172个处理分数的重新定位数据,使用2个标准差(2SD)和分析方法计算的。总体而言,使用Type-S和BPL1装置,91.7%和74.1%的处理馏分的总3D重定位位移分别≤3.0 mm。在胸椎中,43.2%和46.5%的分数在各自的设置下位移≤1.5 mm。在所有方向和用例中,建议的边缘都在3.5毫米以下。使用分析方法计算,在前后方向,BPL1装置与s型装置相比,胸椎的建议切缘小0.6 mm,为1.4 mm。Type-S和BPL1装置对于脊柱SABR的固定都是有效的。s型在上脊柱表现出优越的固定性,仍然是颈椎和上胸椎定位的临床标准。BPL1装置在治疗中下胸椎和腰椎的用例中显示出有效的固定效果,并且仍然是这些用例的临床标准。结果进一步证明了潜在PTV边际降低的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
期刊最新文献
Focal spot motion in digital breast tomosynthesis and its effect on spatial resolution Margin reduction and optimal prescription isodose model for liver stereotactic radiotherapy with respiratory motion Initial experience with remote MRI scanning support in an oncology focused practice: Opportunities for expanded access to radiology care Ultra-fast dosimetric data collection with a commercial plastic scintillation detector in an MR-linac Quantifying stent-induced dose perturbations in intravascular brachytherapy using 3D- printed phantoms and film dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1