Accuracy and safety evaluation of a novel artificial intelligence-based robotic system for autonomous spinal posterior decompression.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical focus Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24400
Chengxia Wang, Shuai Jiang, Zhuofu Li, Woquan Zhong, Xiongkang Song, Hongsheng Liu, Lei Hu, Weishi Li
{"title":"Accuracy and safety evaluation of a novel artificial intelligence-based robotic system for autonomous spinal posterior decompression.","authors":"Chengxia Wang, Shuai Jiang, Zhuofu Li, Woquan Zhong, Xiongkang Song, Hongsheng Liu, Lei Hu, Weishi Li","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to introduce a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based robotic system for autonomous planning of spinal posterior decompression and verify its accuracy through a cadaveric model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen vertebrae from 3 cadavers were included in the study. Three thoracic vertebrae (T9-11) and 3 lumbar vertebrae (L3-5) were selected from each cadaver. After obtaining CT data, the robotic system independently planned the laminectomy path based on AI algorithms before the surgical procedure and automatically performed the decompression during the procedure. A postoperative CT scan was performed, and the deviation of each cutting plane from the preoperative plan was quantitatively analyzed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of the cuts. The duration of laminectomy was also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 285 cuts were made on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. The average duration for unilateral longitudinal cutting was 16.38 ± 4.76 minutes, while for transverse cutting it was 4.44 ± 1.52 minutes. In terms of accuracy assessment, 3 levels were divided based on the distance between the actual cutting plane and the preplanned plane: 77 (84%) were grade A, 15 (16%) were grade B, and none were grade C. Regarding safety assessment, 74 (80%) were designated safe (grade A), with 18 (20%) classified as uncertain (grade B).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results confirm the accuracy and preliminary safety of the robotic system for autonomous planning and cutting of spinal decompression.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 6","pages":"E16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to introduce a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based robotic system for autonomous planning of spinal posterior decompression and verify its accuracy through a cadaveric model.

Methods: Seventeen vertebrae from 3 cadavers were included in the study. Three thoracic vertebrae (T9-11) and 3 lumbar vertebrae (L3-5) were selected from each cadaver. After obtaining CT data, the robotic system independently planned the laminectomy path based on AI algorithms before the surgical procedure and automatically performed the decompression during the procedure. A postoperative CT scan was performed, and the deviation of each cutting plane from the preoperative plan was quantitatively analyzed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of the cuts. The duration of laminectomy was also recorded.

Results: A total of 285 cuts were made on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. The average duration for unilateral longitudinal cutting was 16.38 ± 4.76 minutes, while for transverse cutting it was 4.44 ± 1.52 minutes. In terms of accuracy assessment, 3 levels were divided based on the distance between the actual cutting plane and the preplanned plane: 77 (84%) were grade A, 15 (16%) were grade B, and none were grade C. Regarding safety assessment, 74 (80%) were designated safe (grade A), with 18 (20%) classified as uncertain (grade B).

Conclusions: The results confirm the accuracy and preliminary safety of the robotic system for autonomous planning and cutting of spinal decompression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工智能的自主脊柱后路减压机器人系统的准确性和安全性评估。
目的:介绍一种基于人工智能(AI)的脊柱后路减压自主规划机器人系统,并通过尸体模型验证其准确性。方法:选取3具尸体的17块椎骨作为研究对象。每具尸体取3节胸椎(T9-11)和3节腰椎(L3-5)。在获取CT数据后,机器人系统在手术前根据AI算法独立规划椎板切除路径,并在术中自动进行减压。术后行CT扫描,定量分析各切割平面与术前计划的偏差,评价切割的准确性和安全性。同时记录椎板切除术的持续时间。结果:胸椎、腰椎共切口285处。单侧纵向切割的平均时间为16.38±4.76 min,横向切割的平均时间为4.44±1.52 min。在准确性评估方面,根据实际切割平面与计划切割平面的距离,将其分为3个等级:A级77个(84%),B级15个(16%),c级0个。在安全性评估方面,安全74个(80%)(A级),不确定18个(20%)(B级)。结论:结果证实了机器人自主规划和切割脊柱减压系统的准确性和初步安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Introduction. The value of complications. Complications of spine surgery. Editorial. Foundations of a focused vision: Martin H. Weiss, MD, and the origins of Neurosurgical Focus. Engineered neuroglial organoids as living neural interfaces for restorative neurosurgery. Letter to the Editor. Middle meningeal artery embolization in preventing chronic SDH recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1