Zakaridja Guiriansoro, Tatiana Oussova, Joel Weissfeld
{"title":"Regulatory Impact of Selected U.S. FDA Postmarketing Safety Registries Conducted for Drugs Used to Treat Inflammatory or Autoimmune Conditions.","authors":"Zakaridja Guiriansoro, Tatiana Oussova, Joel Weissfeld","doi":"10.1002/pds.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assess the regulatory impact of selected FDA postmarketing safety registries on drug product labeling updates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Postmarketing safety studies were identified in internal record repositories for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. FDA, in March and September 2021. Studies eligible for review included prospectively enrolling patient registry studies conducted to assess the safety of drug products used to treat inflammatory or autoimmune conditions. These studies were requested between 1999 and 2011.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This paper analyzed 10 safety (non-pregnancy) registries and four pregnancy registries (n = 14). Only four safety registry studies were successful in reaching their targets for both patient enrollment and patient follow-up or drug exposure. These registries were either multi-center, multinational studies or studies using participants from a health insurance or health maintenance organization. None of the safety registries led to safety labeling updates, regardless of targets' achievement for study enrollment and follow-up: six did not detect a new safety signal and four provided inconclusive results. Two pregnancy registries reached their targets for patient enrollment, and all four resulted in safety labeling updates, as required by the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While six non-pregnancy registries did not detect a new safety signal, four did not produce safety results considered sufficiently robust to warrant specific regulatory action including safety-related labeling updates. The lack of safety signal detection in these observational studies should not imply the absence of safety signals. Appropriately designed, prospective, randomized controlled safety studies are the most reliable way to obtain interpretable safety data.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"33 12","pages":"e70034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Assess the regulatory impact of selected FDA postmarketing safety registries on drug product labeling updates.
Methods: Postmarketing safety studies were identified in internal record repositories for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. FDA, in March and September 2021. Studies eligible for review included prospectively enrolling patient registry studies conducted to assess the safety of drug products used to treat inflammatory or autoimmune conditions. These studies were requested between 1999 and 2011.
Results: This paper analyzed 10 safety (non-pregnancy) registries and four pregnancy registries (n = 14). Only four safety registry studies were successful in reaching their targets for both patient enrollment and patient follow-up or drug exposure. These registries were either multi-center, multinational studies or studies using participants from a health insurance or health maintenance organization. None of the safety registries led to safety labeling updates, regardless of targets' achievement for study enrollment and follow-up: six did not detect a new safety signal and four provided inconclusive results. Two pregnancy registries reached their targets for patient enrollment, and all four resulted in safety labeling updates, as required by the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule guidance.
Conclusions: While six non-pregnancy registries did not detect a new safety signal, four did not produce safety results considered sufficiently robust to warrant specific regulatory action including safety-related labeling updates. The lack of safety signal detection in these observational studies should not imply the absence of safety signals. Appropriately designed, prospective, randomized controlled safety studies are the most reliable way to obtain interpretable safety data.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.