Regulatory Impact of Selected U.S. FDA Postmarketing Safety Registries Conducted for Drugs Used to Treat Inflammatory or Autoimmune Conditions.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/pds.70034
Zakaridja Guiriansoro, Tatiana Oussova, Joel Weissfeld
{"title":"Regulatory Impact of Selected U.S. FDA Postmarketing Safety Registries Conducted for Drugs Used to Treat Inflammatory or Autoimmune Conditions.","authors":"Zakaridja Guiriansoro, Tatiana Oussova, Joel Weissfeld","doi":"10.1002/pds.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assess the regulatory impact of selected FDA postmarketing safety registries on drug product labeling updates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Postmarketing safety studies were identified in internal record repositories for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. FDA, in March and September 2021. Studies eligible for review included prospectively enrolling patient registry studies conducted to assess the safety of drug products used to treat inflammatory or autoimmune conditions. These studies were requested between 1999 and 2011.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This paper analyzed 10 safety (non-pregnancy) registries and four pregnancy registries (n = 14). Only four safety registry studies were successful in reaching their targets for both patient enrollment and patient follow-up or drug exposure. These registries were either multi-center, multinational studies or studies using participants from a health insurance or health maintenance organization. None of the safety registries led to safety labeling updates, regardless of targets' achievement for study enrollment and follow-up: six did not detect a new safety signal and four provided inconclusive results. Two pregnancy registries reached their targets for patient enrollment, and all four resulted in safety labeling updates, as required by the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While six non-pregnancy registries did not detect a new safety signal, four did not produce safety results considered sufficiently robust to warrant specific regulatory action including safety-related labeling updates. The lack of safety signal detection in these observational studies should not imply the absence of safety signals. Appropriately designed, prospective, randomized controlled safety studies are the most reliable way to obtain interpretable safety data.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"33 12","pages":"e70034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Assess the regulatory impact of selected FDA postmarketing safety registries on drug product labeling updates.

Methods: Postmarketing safety studies were identified in internal record repositories for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. FDA, in March and September 2021. Studies eligible for review included prospectively enrolling patient registry studies conducted to assess the safety of drug products used to treat inflammatory or autoimmune conditions. These studies were requested between 1999 and 2011.

Results: This paper analyzed 10 safety (non-pregnancy) registries and four pregnancy registries (n = 14). Only four safety registry studies were successful in reaching their targets for both patient enrollment and patient follow-up or drug exposure. These registries were either multi-center, multinational studies or studies using participants from a health insurance or health maintenance organization. None of the safety registries led to safety labeling updates, regardless of targets' achievement for study enrollment and follow-up: six did not detect a new safety signal and four provided inconclusive results. Two pregnancy registries reached their targets for patient enrollment, and all four resulted in safety labeling updates, as required by the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule guidance.

Conclusions: While six non-pregnancy registries did not detect a new safety signal, four did not produce safety results considered sufficiently robust to warrant specific regulatory action including safety-related labeling updates. The lack of safety signal detection in these observational studies should not imply the absence of safety signals. Appropriately designed, prospective, randomized controlled safety studies are the most reliable way to obtain interpretable safety data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国FDA对用于治疗炎症或自身免疫性疾病的药物上市后安全注册的监管影响
目的:评估选定的FDA上市后安全注册对药品标签更新的监管影响。方法:于2021年3月和9月在美国FDA药物评估和研究中心的内部档案库中确定上市后安全性研究。符合审查条件的研究包括前瞻性纳入患者登记研究,以评估用于治疗炎症或自身免疫性疾病的药品的安全性。这些研究是在1999年至2011年间要求进行的。结果:本文分析了10份安全(非妊娠)登记和4份妊娠登记(n = 14)。只有四项安全登记研究成功地达到了患者入组和患者随访或药物暴露的目标。这些登记要么是多中心、多国研究,要么是使用健康保险或健康维护组织参与者的研究。没有一个安全登记导致安全标签更新,不管研究登记和随访的目标是否达到:6个没有检测到新的安全信号,4个提供了不确定的结果。两个妊娠登记中心达到了患者登记的目标,并且根据妊娠和哺乳标签规则指南的要求,所有四个妊娠登记中心都进行了安全标签更新。结论:虽然6个非妊娠登记没有检测到新的安全信号,但4个没有产生足够可靠的安全结果,不能保证采取具体的监管行动,包括安全相关的标签更新。这些观察性研究中缺乏安全信号检测并不意味着没有安全信号。适当设计、前瞻性、随机对照安全性研究是获得可解释安全性数据的最可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Lookback Duration on the Performance of a Claims-Based Frailty Proxy in Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer. Impact of Pharmacovigilance Interventions Targeting Fluoroquinolones on Antibiotic Use in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Successful Linkage of Electronic Medical Records and National Health Data System in Type 2 Diabetes Research: Methodological Insights and Implications. Use of Potentially Nephrotoxic Drugs in Type 2 Diabetes Patients on SGLT2i: A Trajectories Analysis. Lessons Learned From Characterizing Long COVID Among US Medicare Beneficiaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1