Anastasia S Papin, Hei Kit Chan, Angela Child, N Clay Mann, Daniel C Walter, Anna Maria Johnson, Kevin Schulz, Janet Page-Reeves, Ryan M Huebinger
{"title":"Community Disparities in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Prehospital Antiarrhythmic Practices.","authors":"Anastasia S Papin, Hei Kit Chan, Angela Child, N Clay Mann, Daniel C Walter, Anna Maria Johnson, Kevin Schulz, Janet Page-Reeves, Ryan M Huebinger","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2436051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Antiarrhythmic administration is an important treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with a shockable rhythm, but little is known about disparities in such antiarrhythmic practices. We sought to investigate the association between community race/ethnicity and prehospital antiarrhythmic administration for OHCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of a national prehospital database, NEMSIS, linked to Census data. We included OHCAs with a shockable rhythm from 2018-2021. We stratified patients based on majority (>50%) ZIP code race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White (White), non-Hispanic Black (Black), and Hispanic/Latino). We then created two cohorts: 1) patients with a shockable rhythm at any point to study differences in antiarrhythmic administration rates, and 2) patients with an initial shockable rhythm to analyse differences in time to antiarrhythmic administration. For patients with a shockable rhythm at any point, we used logistic regressions to evaluate the association of community race to antiarrhythmic administration. For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, we compared the time from EMS dispatch to the first antiarrhythmic administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 763,944 cardiac arrests, 255,875 had a shockable rhythm during the OHCA, and 139,581 had an initial shockable rhythm. For patients with a shockable rhythm at any point, majority White (33.0%) received antiarrhythmics at a higher rate than majority Black (28.9%; aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-0.9) and majority Hispanic/Latino (27.8%; aOR 0.8 95% CI 0.7-0.8). For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, the time to antiarrhythmic for White (median 19.6, IQR 15.0-26.3 minutes) was lower than for Black (median 20.5 minutes, IQR 16.3-26.4, p < 0.01) but higher than Hispanic/Latino (median 18.0 minutes, IQR 14.3-23.4, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While antiarrhythmic administration rate was lower for minority communities and time to antiarrhythmic was higher for Black OHCAs, time to antiarrhythmic administration was lower for Hispanic/Latino OHCAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2436051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Antiarrhythmic administration is an important treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with a shockable rhythm, but little is known about disparities in such antiarrhythmic practices. We sought to investigate the association between community race/ethnicity and prehospital antiarrhythmic administration for OHCA.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of a national prehospital database, NEMSIS, linked to Census data. We included OHCAs with a shockable rhythm from 2018-2021. We stratified patients based on majority (>50%) ZIP code race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White (White), non-Hispanic Black (Black), and Hispanic/Latino). We then created two cohorts: 1) patients with a shockable rhythm at any point to study differences in antiarrhythmic administration rates, and 2) patients with an initial shockable rhythm to analyse differences in time to antiarrhythmic administration. For patients with a shockable rhythm at any point, we used logistic regressions to evaluate the association of community race to antiarrhythmic administration. For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, we compared the time from EMS dispatch to the first antiarrhythmic administration.
Results: Of 763,944 cardiac arrests, 255,875 had a shockable rhythm during the OHCA, and 139,581 had an initial shockable rhythm. For patients with a shockable rhythm at any point, majority White (33.0%) received antiarrhythmics at a higher rate than majority Black (28.9%; aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-0.9) and majority Hispanic/Latino (27.8%; aOR 0.8 95% CI 0.7-0.8). For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, the time to antiarrhythmic for White (median 19.6, IQR 15.0-26.3 minutes) was lower than for Black (median 20.5 minutes, IQR 16.3-26.4, p < 0.01) but higher than Hispanic/Latino (median 18.0 minutes, IQR 14.3-23.4, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: While antiarrhythmic administration rate was lower for minority communities and time to antiarrhythmic was higher for Black OHCAs, time to antiarrhythmic administration was lower for Hispanic/Latino OHCAs.
期刊介绍:
Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.