Community Disparities in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Prehospital Antiarrhythmic Practices.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Prehospital Emergency Care Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1080/10903127.2024.2436051
Anastasia S Papin, Hei Kit Chan, Angela Child, N Clay Mann, Daniel C Walter, Anna Maria Johnson, Kevin Schulz, Janet Page-Reeves, Ryan M Huebinger
{"title":"Community Disparities in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Prehospital Antiarrhythmic Practices.","authors":"Anastasia S Papin, Hei Kit Chan, Angela Child, N Clay Mann, Daniel C Walter, Anna Maria Johnson, Kevin Schulz, Janet Page-Reeves, Ryan M Huebinger","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2436051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Antiarrhythmic administration is an important treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with a shockable rhythm, but a minimal amount is known about disparities in such antiarrhythmic practices. We sought to investigate the association between community race/ethnicity and prehospital antiarrhythmic administration for OHCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of a national prehospital database, National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS), linked to Census data. We included OHCAs with a shockable rhythm from 2018 to 2021. We stratified patients based on majority (>50%) ZIP code race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White (White), non-Hispanic Black (Black), and Hispanic/Latino). We then created two cohorts: (1) patients with a shockable rhythm at any point to study differences in antiarrhythmic administration rates, and (2) patients with an initial shockable rhythm to analyze differences in time to antiarrhythmic administration. For patients with a shockable rhythm at any point, we used logistic regressions to evaluate the association of community race to antiarrhythmic administration. For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, we compared the time from emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch to the first antiarrhythmic administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 763,944 cardiac arrests, 311,499 had a shockable rhythm during the OHCA, and 237,838 had an initial shockable rhythm. For patients with a shockable rhythm at any point, majority White (33.0%) received antiarrhythmics at a higher rate than majority Black (28.9%; aOR 0.9, 95%CI 0.8-0.9) and majority Hispanic/Latino (27.8%; aOR 0.8 95%CI 0.7-0.8). For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, the time to antiarrhythmic for White (median 19.6 min, IQR 15.00-26.28 min) was lower than for Black (median 20.5 min, IQR 16.33-26.35 min, <i>p</i> < 0.01) but higher than Hispanic/Latino (median 18.0 min, IQR 14.33-23.42 min, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While antiarrhythmic administration rate was lower for minority communities and time to antiarrhythmic was higher for Black OHCAs, time to antiarrhythmic administration was lower for Hispanic/Latino OHCAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2436051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Antiarrhythmic administration is an important treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with a shockable rhythm, but a minimal amount is known about disparities in such antiarrhythmic practices. We sought to investigate the association between community race/ethnicity and prehospital antiarrhythmic administration for OHCA.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of a national prehospital database, National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS), linked to Census data. We included OHCAs with a shockable rhythm from 2018 to 2021. We stratified patients based on majority (>50%) ZIP code race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White (White), non-Hispanic Black (Black), and Hispanic/Latino). We then created two cohorts: (1) patients with a shockable rhythm at any point to study differences in antiarrhythmic administration rates, and (2) patients with an initial shockable rhythm to analyze differences in time to antiarrhythmic administration. For patients with a shockable rhythm at any point, we used logistic regressions to evaluate the association of community race to antiarrhythmic administration. For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, we compared the time from emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch to the first antiarrhythmic administration.

Results: Of 763,944 cardiac arrests, 311,499 had a shockable rhythm during the OHCA, and 237,838 had an initial shockable rhythm. For patients with a shockable rhythm at any point, majority White (33.0%) received antiarrhythmics at a higher rate than majority Black (28.9%; aOR 0.9, 95%CI 0.8-0.9) and majority Hispanic/Latino (27.8%; aOR 0.8 95%CI 0.7-0.8). For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, the time to antiarrhythmic for White (median 19.6 min, IQR 15.00-26.28 min) was lower than for Black (median 20.5 min, IQR 16.33-26.35 min, p < 0.01) but higher than Hispanic/Latino (median 18.0 min, IQR 14.33-23.42 min, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: While antiarrhythmic administration rate was lower for minority communities and time to antiarrhythmic was higher for Black OHCAs, time to antiarrhythmic administration was lower for Hispanic/Latino OHCAs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
院外心脏骤停院前抗心律失常实践的社区差异。
目的:抗心律失常给药是院外心脏骤停(OHCA)伴有震荡性心律的重要治疗方法,但对这种抗心律失常做法的差异知之甚少。我们试图调查社区种族/民族与OHCA院前抗心律失常用药之间的关系。方法:我们对与人口普查数据相关的国家院前数据库NEMSIS进行了回顾性研究。我们纳入了2018-2021年间节律惊人的ohca。我们根据大多数(bbb50 %)邮政编码种族/民族(非西班牙裔白人(White),非西班牙裔黑人(Black)和西班牙裔/拉丁裔)对患者进行分层。然后,我们创建了两个队列:1)在任何时间点具有震荡性心律的患者,以研究抗心律失常给药率的差异;2)初始具有震荡性心律的患者,以分析抗心律失常给药时间的差异。对于在任何时间点出现震荡性心律的患者,我们使用逻辑回归来评估社区种族与抗心律失常给药的关系。对于最初有震荡性心律的患者,我们比较了从EMS调度到第一次抗心律失常的时间。结果:在763,944例心脏骤停中,255,875例在OHCA期间有震荡性心律,139,581例有初始震荡性心律。对于在任何时间点出现震荡性心律的患者,大多数白人(33.0%)接受抗心律失常药物治疗的比例高于大多数黑人(28.9%);aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-0.9)和大多数西班牙裔/拉丁裔(27.8%;aOR 0.8 (95% CI 0.7-0.8)。对于初始震荡心律患者,白人患者抗心律失常时间(中位数19.6分钟,IQR为15.0-26.3分钟)低于黑人患者(中位数20.5分钟,IQR为16.3-26.4分钟,p)结论:少数族裔社区的抗心律失常给药率较低,黑人ohca的抗心律失常时间较高,而西班牙裔/拉丁裔ohca的抗心律失常给药时间较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Social Determinants of Health and Emergency Medical Services: A Scoping Review. Chest Compressions Synchronized to Native Cardiac Contractions are More Effective than Unsynchronized Compressions for Improving Coronary Perfusion Pressure in a Novel Pseudo-PEA Swine Model. Paramedic-administered fibrinolysis in older patients with prehospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Prehospital Whole Blood Administration Not Associated with Increased Transfusion Reactions: The Experience of a Metropolitan EMS Agency. Non-Invasive Ventilation as a Pre-Oxygenation Strategy During In-Flight Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1