Prehospital Whole Blood Administration Not Associated with Increased Transfusion Reactions: The Experience of a Metropolitan EMS Agency.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Prehospital Emergency Care Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1080/10903127.2025.2464247
Emily Raetz, David Wampler, Leslie Greebon, Donald Jenkins, Erika Brigmon, Jacquelyn Messenger, Vipulkumar Prajapati, William Bullock, Emmanuel Rayas, Lauren Barry, Brian Ferguson, Rachel Ely, Christopher Winckler
{"title":"Prehospital Whole Blood Administration Not Associated with Increased Transfusion Reactions: The Experience of a Metropolitan EMS Agency.","authors":"Emily Raetz, David Wampler, Leslie Greebon, Donald Jenkins, Erika Brigmon, Jacquelyn Messenger, Vipulkumar Prajapati, William Bullock, Emmanuel Rayas, Lauren Barry, Brian Ferguson, Rachel Ely, Christopher Winckler","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2464247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Low titer O<sup>+</sup> whole blood (LTO + WB) has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma patients and use is increasingly common. Studies on prehospital use and efficacy have been published throughout the literature, but few of these fully address the risks of transfusion reactions and other side effects. The focus of this study is to look at prehospital LTO + WB transfusions in trauma patients and review for transfusion reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of consecutive trauma patients who received prehospital LTO + WB over a 4.5-year period. We used EMS agency transfusion records and institutional blood bank data from two urban level I trauma centers for records on blood transfusion reactions. Excluded from the study were patients declared dead on arrival to the hospital, patients transfused for non-traumatic complaints, patients for whom hospital records were unavailable, and any transfusion reaction that occurred more than 10 days after the prehospital transfusion. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1126 prehospital transfusions 572 met inclusion criteria. There were 2 (0.35%) suspected transfusion reactions, none of which were determined to be hemolytic reactions. There was 1 febrile non-hemolytic reaction on hospital day 1 and there was 1 allergic reaction with hives and shortness of breath that occurred on hospital day 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehospital LTO + WB is safe to use and has a similar rate of transfusion reaction as when given in-hospital. Concerns about transfusion reactions caused by LTO + WB should not preclude its use prehospital. Regardless of the low incidence of transfusion reactions, prehospital personnel should be trained in their recognition and management. Limitations include retrospective study design and the inability to distinguish transfusion reactions from prehospital LTO + WB versus reaction to blood products transfused at the trauma center.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2464247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Low titer O+ whole blood (LTO + WB) has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma patients and use is increasingly common. Studies on prehospital use and efficacy have been published throughout the literature, but few of these fully address the risks of transfusion reactions and other side effects. The focus of this study is to look at prehospital LTO + WB transfusions in trauma patients and review for transfusion reactions.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of consecutive trauma patients who received prehospital LTO + WB over a 4.5-year period. We used EMS agency transfusion records and institutional blood bank data from two urban level I trauma centers for records on blood transfusion reactions. Excluded from the study were patients declared dead on arrival to the hospital, patients transfused for non-traumatic complaints, patients for whom hospital records were unavailable, and any transfusion reaction that occurred more than 10 days after the prehospital transfusion. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.

Results: Of 1126 prehospital transfusions 572 met inclusion criteria. There were 2 (0.35%) suspected transfusion reactions, none of which were determined to be hemolytic reactions. There was 1 febrile non-hemolytic reaction on hospital day 1 and there was 1 allergic reaction with hives and shortness of breath that occurred on hospital day 1.

Conclusions: Prehospital LTO + WB is safe to use and has a similar rate of transfusion reaction as when given in-hospital. Concerns about transfusion reactions caused by LTO + WB should not preclude its use prehospital. Regardless of the low incidence of transfusion reactions, prehospital personnel should be trained in their recognition and management. Limitations include retrospective study design and the inability to distinguish transfusion reactions from prehospital LTO + WB versus reaction to blood products transfused at the trauma center.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Chest Compressions Synchronized to Native Cardiac Contractions are More Effective than Unsynchronized Compressions for Improving Coronary Perfusion Pressure in a Novel Pseudo-PEA Swine Model. Paramedic-administered fibrinolysis in older patients with prehospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Prehospital Whole Blood Administration Not Associated with Increased Transfusion Reactions: The Experience of a Metropolitan EMS Agency. Non-Invasive Ventilation as a Pre-Oxygenation Strategy During In-Flight Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Case Report. Epinephrine in Prehospital Traumatic Cardiac Arrest-Life Saving or False Hope?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1