Client preferences for and perceptions of psychotherapy modality and delivery in a university counseling setting.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1037/ser0000923
David M Erekson, Isaac Hamm, Benjamin Jackson, Colby Schramel, Joseph Rees, Heidi A Vogeler, Katherine D Howe
{"title":"Client preferences for and perceptions of psychotherapy modality and delivery in a university counseling setting.","authors":"David M Erekson, Isaac Hamm, Benjamin Jackson, Colby Schramel, Joseph Rees, Heidi A Vogeler, Katherine D Howe","doi":"10.1037/ser0000923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rise in demand for mental health services and the changed landscape of post-COVID-19 therapy delivery, examining both therapy modality (e.g., individual, group) and delivery methods (e.g., in-person, remote) has become increasingly important. While empirical evidence generally supports equivalency of outcomes across modalities and delivery methods, there is less evidence regarding comparative preferences and perceptions of these variables. To begin to answer these questions, we surveyed a random sample of 777 university students at a large, western university. Congruent with the previous literature, results suggest that there is a strong preference for in-person individual therapy, in spite of the increased experience with teletherapy. We also found a strong reluctance to engage with group therapy. Demographic factors predicting modality and delivery preferences indicated that being older and a woman were associated with increased likelihood to prefer individual therapy (both in-person and teletherapy), and lower class standing was associated with a stronger preference for group therapy. The only symptoms predictor for preferences included higher levels of social anxiety being associated with a higher preference for online self-help. While those who had previously engaged in a particular type of therapy were typically two to three times more likely to prefer it in the future, those who had attended in-person group therapy were over five times more likely to prefer it in the future. Finally, perceptions of past experiences with in-person therapy were significantly more positive than experiences with teletherapy. We discuss the implications of these findings for future research and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rise in demand for mental health services and the changed landscape of post-COVID-19 therapy delivery, examining both therapy modality (e.g., individual, group) and delivery methods (e.g., in-person, remote) has become increasingly important. While empirical evidence generally supports equivalency of outcomes across modalities and delivery methods, there is less evidence regarding comparative preferences and perceptions of these variables. To begin to answer these questions, we surveyed a random sample of 777 university students at a large, western university. Congruent with the previous literature, results suggest that there is a strong preference for in-person individual therapy, in spite of the increased experience with teletherapy. We also found a strong reluctance to engage with group therapy. Demographic factors predicting modality and delivery preferences indicated that being older and a woman were associated with increased likelihood to prefer individual therapy (both in-person and teletherapy), and lower class standing was associated with a stronger preference for group therapy. The only symptoms predictor for preferences included higher levels of social anxiety being associated with a higher preference for online self-help. While those who had previously engaged in a particular type of therapy were typically two to three times more likely to prefer it in the future, those who had attended in-person group therapy were over five times more likely to prefer it in the future. Finally, perceptions of past experiences with in-person therapy were significantly more positive than experiences with teletherapy. We discuss the implications of these findings for future research and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
期刊最新文献
Implementing brief behavioral treatment for insomnia in Department of Veterans Affairs Primary Care Mental Health Integration clinics: Reach outcomes from a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial. Examining the factor structure of the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS) in a military population: Initial development and validation of a four-factor version of the ACSS. Client preferences for and perceptions of psychotherapy modality and delivery in a university counseling setting. It gives you a really great feeling, knowing that what you are doing is making somebody's day: Provider perspectives on implementing the individualized positive psychosocial interaction. Was training enough? Examining the implementation of evidence-based psychotherapies for depression in Veterans Health Administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1