Global Assessment of Medication Adherence: Correlational Analyses of a Brief Tool for Evaluating Medication Adherence in Patients with Severe Mental Disorders.
Mustafa Yıldız, Bahadır Geniş, Mehmet Buğrahan Gürcan, Aysel İncedere, Sesil Dabakoğlu, Sevcan Yükseker
{"title":"Global Assessment of Medication Adherence: Correlational Analyses of a Brief Tool for Evaluating Medication Adherence in Patients with Severe Mental Disorders.","authors":"Mustafa Yıldız, Bahadır Geniş, Mehmet Buğrahan Gürcan, Aysel İncedere, Sesil Dabakoğlu, Sevcan Yükseker","doi":"10.5152/pcp.2024.24869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of medication adherence of patients with severe mental disorders is an important aspect of long-term treatment. There is a need for a brief and practical tool to assess medication adherence. This study investigates the clinical, functional, and validational correlations of a short and easy-to-use tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Global Assessment of Medication Adherence (GAMA) was prepared as a single item with 5 severity degrees, from complete adherence (1 point) to complete nonadherence (5 points). The scale was applied to patients with severe mental illnesses receiving outpatient and inpatient treatment. The GAMA scores were compared with psychopathology, clinical severity, insight, and functionality scale scores. While the validity analyses were tested with face, convergent, and criterion validity, interrater reliability was used for the reliability analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 70 outpatients and 14 inpatients were examined. In the analyses performed for convergent validity, a positive correlation was found between GAMA scores and psychopathology (r=0.646, P < .001), and clinical severity (r = 0.692, P < .001), and a significant negative correlation was found between GAMA scores and insight (r = −0.793, P < .001), and functionality (r = −0.740, P < .001). There was a significant difference in the GAMA scores of 14 patients assessed during hospitalization and discharge. A high positive correlation was found between the GAMA measurements of the psychiatrist and the nurse at admission and discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that the GAMA has sufficient psychometric properties for assessing medication adherence. Due to its brevity, simplicity, and validity, the scale is appropriate for use in routine clinical practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":20847,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"320-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2024.24869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Assessment of medication adherence of patients with severe mental disorders is an important aspect of long-term treatment. There is a need for a brief and practical tool to assess medication adherence. This study investigates the clinical, functional, and validational correlations of a short and easy-to-use tool.
Methods: Global Assessment of Medication Adherence (GAMA) was prepared as a single item with 5 severity degrees, from complete adherence (1 point) to complete nonadherence (5 points). The scale was applied to patients with severe mental illnesses receiving outpatient and inpatient treatment. The GAMA scores were compared with psychopathology, clinical severity, insight, and functionality scale scores. While the validity analyses were tested with face, convergent, and criterion validity, interrater reliability was used for the reliability analysis.
Results: Data from 70 outpatients and 14 inpatients were examined. In the analyses performed for convergent validity, a positive correlation was found between GAMA scores and psychopathology (r=0.646, P < .001), and clinical severity (r = 0.692, P < .001), and a significant negative correlation was found between GAMA scores and insight (r = −0.793, P < .001), and functionality (r = −0.740, P < .001). There was a significant difference in the GAMA scores of 14 patients assessed during hospitalization and discharge. A high positive correlation was found between the GAMA measurements of the psychiatrist and the nurse at admission and discharge.
Conclusion: This study shows that the GAMA has sufficient psychometric properties for assessing medication adherence. Due to its brevity, simplicity, and validity, the scale is appropriate for use in routine clinical practice and research.
背景:重度精神障碍患者药物依从性评估是长期治疗的一个重要方面。需要一种简单实用的工具来评估药物依从性。本研究探讨临床,功能和有效性的相关性,一个简短的和易于使用的工具。方法:GAMA (Global Assessment of Medication依从性)量表分为5个严重程度单项,从完全依从(1分)到完全不依从(5分)。该量表适用于门诊和住院治疗的严重精神疾病患者。将GAMA评分与精神病理、临床严重程度、洞察力和功能量表评分进行比较。信度分析采用面效度、收敛效度和标准效度,信度分析采用互信度。结果:对70例门诊患者和14例住院患者的资料进行了分析。在收敛效度分析中,GAMA评分与精神病理(r=0.646, P < .001)和临床严重程度(r= 0.692, P < .001)呈正相关,GAMA评分与洞察力(r= -0.793, P < .001)和功能(r= -0.740, P < .001)呈显著负相关。14例患者在住院和出院期间的GAMA评分有显著差异。在住院和出院时,精神科医生和护士的GAMA测量值之间存在高度正相关。结论:本研究表明GAMA具有足够的心理测量特性来评估药物依从性。由于其简洁性、简易性和有效性,该量表适用于常规临床实践和研究。
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology aims to reach a national and international audience and will accept submissions from authors worldwide. It gives high priority to original studies of interest to clinicians and scientists in applied and basic neurosciences and related disciplines. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes high quality research targeted to specialists, residents and scientists in psychiatry, psychology, neurology, pharmacology, molecular biology, genetics, physiology, neurochemistry, and related sciences.