Inferior vena cava injuries: Are we doing what we really must?

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Turkish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6363
Rodrigo Barros De Carvalho, Laisa Simakawa Jimenez, Renato Nardi Pedro, Vitor Favali Kruger, Mario Eduardo De Faria Mantovani, Thiago Rodrigues Araújo Calderan, Gustavo Pereira Fraga
{"title":"Inferior vena cava injuries: Are we doing what we really must?","authors":"Rodrigo Barros De Carvalho, Laisa Simakawa Jimenez, Renato Nardi Pedro, Vitor Favali Kruger, Mario Eduardo De Faria Mantovani, Thiago Rodrigues Araújo Calderan, Gustavo Pereira Fraga","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The inferior vena cava (IVC) is one of the most frequent injured intra-abdominal vessels and its treatment requires prompt action. Despite advances in reanimation in last decades, there has not been proportional improvement in IVC mortality. This report aims to discuss the mortality predictive factors including the adherence to balanced reanimation and damage control surgery (DCS) in daily trauma assistance, their repercussions on outcomes, comparing our institution outcomes to literature.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective design analysis was made through database records of trauma patients at Clinic Hospital of University of Campinas, UNICAMP in order to investigate patients with IVC injuries, putting an emphasis on mortality predictive factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four patients were identified with IVC injury from January 1990 to August 2017. Predominant mechanism was penetrating with 87.8% (76.3% gunshot). On arrival, 37.8% of all of the victims were hypotensive, and ISS median was 24.5. Regarding location of IVC, 68.5% were infrarenal, 12.2% were suprarenal, 18.9% retrohepatic. Simple repair was performed in 60.8%. Ligation was carried out in 27% and atriocaval shunt was performed in 4.1%. There was not enough time for specific procedure in 8.1%. Associated intra-abdominal injuries were present in 97.3%, and the mean of transfusional requirements was 9.1 ± 6.9 for packed red blood cells. Overall mortality rate was 52.7%, with a mortality rate for infrarenal injuries being 39.2%. Damage control surgery was adopted in 33.8%, with 68% mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A solid comprehension of shock reanimation has progressively been disseminated; however, trauma care professionals must assure that they are being applied with balanced reanimation and DCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":"40 2","pages":"119-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The inferior vena cava (IVC) is one of the most frequent injured intra-abdominal vessels and its treatment requires prompt action. Despite advances in reanimation in last decades, there has not been proportional improvement in IVC mortality. This report aims to discuss the mortality predictive factors including the adherence to balanced reanimation and damage control surgery (DCS) in daily trauma assistance, their repercussions on outcomes, comparing our institution outcomes to literature.

Material and methods: A retrospective design analysis was made through database records of trauma patients at Clinic Hospital of University of Campinas, UNICAMP in order to investigate patients with IVC injuries, putting an emphasis on mortality predictive factors.

Results: Seventy-four patients were identified with IVC injury from January 1990 to August 2017. Predominant mechanism was penetrating with 87.8% (76.3% gunshot). On arrival, 37.8% of all of the victims were hypotensive, and ISS median was 24.5. Regarding location of IVC, 68.5% were infrarenal, 12.2% were suprarenal, 18.9% retrohepatic. Simple repair was performed in 60.8%. Ligation was carried out in 27% and atriocaval shunt was performed in 4.1%. There was not enough time for specific procedure in 8.1%. Associated intra-abdominal injuries were present in 97.3%, and the mean of transfusional requirements was 9.1 ± 6.9 for packed red blood cells. Overall mortality rate was 52.7%, with a mortality rate for infrarenal injuries being 39.2%. Damage control surgery was adopted in 33.8%, with 68% mortality.

Conclusion: A solid comprehension of shock reanimation has progressively been disseminated; however, trauma care professionals must assure that they are being applied with balanced reanimation and DCS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下腔静脉损伤:我们真的在做我们必须做的吗?
目的:下腔静脉(IVC)是最常见的腹内血管损伤之一,其治疗需要及时采取措施。尽管在过去的几十年里在复苏方面取得了进展,但IVC死亡率并没有成比例的改善。本报告旨在讨论死亡率预测因素,包括在日常创伤援助中坚持平衡复苏和损伤控制手术(DCS),它们对结果的影响,并将我们的机构结果与文献进行比较。材料与方法:通过对UNICAMP坎皮纳斯大学临床医院创伤患者的数据库记录进行回顾性设计分析,对下腔静脉损伤患者进行调查,重点研究死亡率预测因素。结果:1990年1月至2017年8月,74例患者被鉴定为下腔静脉损伤。主要机制为穿透,占87.8%(76.3%)。到达时,37.8%的患者低血压,ISS中位数为24.5。在IVC的位置上,68.5%在肾下,12.2%在肾上,18.9%在肝后。单纯修复占60.8%。27%的患者行结扎,4.1%的患者行房腔分流术。8.1%的患者没有足够的时间进行具体的操作。97.3%的患者存在相关的腹腔内损伤,红细胞的平均输血需氧量为9.1±6.9。总死亡率为52.7%,其中肾下损伤死亡率为39.2%。采用损伤控制手术的占33.8%,死亡率68%。结论:对休克复苏的深刻理解已逐渐普及;然而,创伤护理专业人员必须确保他们正在应用平衡的复苏和DCS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Juvenile papillomatosis: A case report. Inferior vena cava injuries: Are we doing what we really must? Laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: An experience of 50 cases from a single tertiary care center. Pancreatic fistula and bleeding following choledochal cyst excision: Experience of two decades. Predictors of citations and altmetric scores in general surgery literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1