Video-based surgical quality assessment of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy by medical students after specific training.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.11.002
Alexander A J Grüter, Boudewijn R Toorenvliet, Pieter J Tanis, Jurriaan B Tuynman
{"title":"Video-based surgical quality assessment of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy by medical students after specific training.","authors":"Alexander A J Grüter, Boudewijn R Toorenvliet, Pieter J Tanis, Jurriaan B Tuynman","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, a competency assessment tool has been developed within the RIGHT project, a national quality improvement program for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy in patients with colon cancer. This study aimed to evaluate whether trained medical students can reliably evaluate minimally invasive right hemicolectomy videos using a competency assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine expert colorectal surgeons, 13 trained medical students, and 17 untrained medical students assessed the surgical quality of 6 full-length minimally invasive right hemicolectomy videos with the competency assessment tool. The expert surgeons were trained using the competency assessment tool by the RIGHT project leaders, who were also involved in the development and validation of the competency assessment tool. Training for medical students included anatomy, step-by-step procedure explanation, and competency assessment tool review with 2 supervised video assessments. The untrained students were taught only anatomy and minimally invasive right hemicolectomy steps. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to determine inter-rater reliability, and analysis of variance with the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was used to assess potential differences between the groups per video.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trained students demonstrated an overall excellent inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient score of 0.885). When their scores were combined with those of the expert surgeons, a high inter-rater reliability was also demonstrated (intraclass correlation coefficient score of 0.945). Trained students consistently aligned with surgeons' mean total scores, also accurately identifying lower quality surgeries. Untrained students assigned statistically significantly higher scores to the 3 lower quality surgeries as compared with expert surgeons and trained students.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among trained students, excellent inter-rater reliability and concordance with expert colorectal surgeons was found. The study highlights the potential to engage trained medical students for objective minimally invasive right hemicolectomy video assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108951"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.11.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recently, a competency assessment tool has been developed within the RIGHT project, a national quality improvement program for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy in patients with colon cancer. This study aimed to evaluate whether trained medical students can reliably evaluate minimally invasive right hemicolectomy videos using a competency assessment tool.

Methods: Nine expert colorectal surgeons, 13 trained medical students, and 17 untrained medical students assessed the surgical quality of 6 full-length minimally invasive right hemicolectomy videos with the competency assessment tool. The expert surgeons were trained using the competency assessment tool by the RIGHT project leaders, who were also involved in the development and validation of the competency assessment tool. Training for medical students included anatomy, step-by-step procedure explanation, and competency assessment tool review with 2 supervised video assessments. The untrained students were taught only anatomy and minimally invasive right hemicolectomy steps. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to determine inter-rater reliability, and analysis of variance with the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was used to assess potential differences between the groups per video.

Results: The trained students demonstrated an overall excellent inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient score of 0.885). When their scores were combined with those of the expert surgeons, a high inter-rater reliability was also demonstrated (intraclass correlation coefficient score of 0.945). Trained students consistently aligned with surgeons' mean total scores, also accurately identifying lower quality surgeries. Untrained students assigned statistically significantly higher scores to the 3 lower quality surgeries as compared with expert surgeons and trained students.

Conclusion: Among trained students, excellent inter-rater reliability and concordance with expert colorectal surgeons was found. The study highlights the potential to engage trained medical students for objective minimally invasive right hemicolectomy video assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生经特殊训练后微创右半结肠切除术的视频质量评价。
背景:最近,在RIGHT项目中开发了一种能力评估工具,RIGHT项目是一项针对结肠癌患者微创右半结肠切除术的国家质量改进计划。本研究旨在评估训练有素的医学生是否能够使用能力评估工具可靠地评估微创右半结肠切除术视频。方法:9名结直肠外科专家、13名训练有素的医学生和17名未训练有素的医学生使用能力评估工具对6段完整的微创右半结肠切除术视频的手术质量进行评估。RIGHT项目负责人对专家外科医生进行了使用能力评估工具的培训,他们也参与了能力评估工具的开发和验证。对医学生的培训包括解剖、一步一步的程序讲解、能力评估工具复习以及2个有监督的视频评估。未经训练的学生只学习解剖和微创右半结肠切除术步骤。计算类内相关系数以确定评分者之间的信度,并使用Bonferroni多重检验的方差分析来评估每个视频组之间的潜在差异。结果:训练后的学员具有良好的班级间信度(班级内相关系数得分为0.885)。当他们的评分与专家外科医生的评分合并时,也显示出较高的评分间信度(类内相关系数得分为0.945)。训练有素的学生与外科医生的平均总分一致,也准确地识别出质量较低的手术。未经培训的学生对3个质量较差的手术的评分明显高于专业医生和经过培训的学生。结论:在接受培训的学生中,与结直肠外科专家有良好的信度和一致性。该研究强调了吸引训练有素的医学生进行客观的微创右半结肠切除术视频评估的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Discussion. Discussion. Discussion. Discussion. Discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1