Efficacy and Safety of LigaSure in Breast Surgery With Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1177/15533506241305892
Muhammad Imran, Mansab Ali, Tungki Pratama Umar, Shujaat Ali, Saba Khalil, Hamza Irfan, Aiman Muhammad, Amna Javed, Fatima Shahzadi, Seemab Ara, Amir Usman, Ubaid Khan
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of LigaSure in Breast Surgery With Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Muhammad Imran, Mansab Ali, Tungki Pratama Umar, Shujaat Ali, Saba Khalil, Hamza Irfan, Aiman Muhammad, Amna Javed, Fatima Shahzadi, Seemab Ara, Amir Usman, Ubaid Khan","doi":"10.1177/15533506241305892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is associated with significant post-operative morbidity in patients undergoing breast surgery due to increased lymphatic leakage. LigaSure, an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system, provides better closure of the leakage. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of LigaSure against conventional techniques in patients with breast cancer underwent ALND and breast surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search across the databases to identify relevant studies. The search results were imported into Covidence for article eligibility screening, and all relevant outcomes data were synthesized using odd ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in meta-analysis models using RevMan 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies with the total of 895 patients (LigaSure = 441; Conventional technique = 454) with breast cancer underwent breast surgery with ALND were included. LigaSure was associated with significantly lower post-operative drain volume (SMD: -0.39, 95% CI [-0.53, -0.24], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), shortened duration of drain (SMD: -0.51, 95% CI [-0.67, -0.34], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), and reduced hospital stay length (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI [-0.96, -0.18], <i>P</i> = 0.004) compared to conventional techniques. However, no difference observed in total operation time, intra-operative blood loss, seroma related outcomes and post-operative complications between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LigaSure significantly reduced the lymphorrhea, duration of drain and hospital stay, however, it did not prove be effective in seroma-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506241305892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241305892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is associated with significant post-operative morbidity in patients undergoing breast surgery due to increased lymphatic leakage. LigaSure, an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system, provides better closure of the leakage. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of LigaSure against conventional techniques in patients with breast cancer underwent ALND and breast surgery.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across the databases to identify relevant studies. The search results were imported into Covidence for article eligibility screening, and all relevant outcomes data were synthesized using odd ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in meta-analysis models using RevMan 5.4.

Results: Twelve studies with the total of 895 patients (LigaSure = 441; Conventional technique = 454) with breast cancer underwent breast surgery with ALND were included. LigaSure was associated with significantly lower post-operative drain volume (SMD: -0.39, 95% CI [-0.53, -0.24], P < 0.00001), shortened duration of drain (SMD: -0.51, 95% CI [-0.67, -0.34], P < 0.00001), and reduced hospital stay length (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI [-0.96, -0.18], P = 0.004) compared to conventional techniques. However, no difference observed in total operation time, intra-operative blood loss, seroma related outcomes and post-operative complications between the two groups.

Conclusion: LigaSure significantly reduced the lymphorrhea, duration of drain and hospital stay, however, it did not prove be effective in seroma-related outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LigaSure在乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结清扫乳腺手术中的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:常规腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)与乳房手术患者术后发病率显著相关,原因是淋巴渗漏增加。LigaSure是一种电热双极密封系统,可以更好地封闭泄漏。本研究旨在比较LigaSure与传统技术在乳腺癌ALND和乳房手术患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:我们在数据库中进行了全面的检索,以确定相关研究。将检索结果导入covid - ence进行文章资格筛选,并使用RevMan 5.4在meta分析模型中使用奇比(or)或95%置信区间(ci)的标准化平均差(SMDs)综合所有相关结果数据。结果:12项研究共纳入895例患者(LigaSure = 441;纳入454例常规技术乳腺癌患者,并行乳房手术合并ALND。与传统技术相比,LigaSure术后引流量显著降低(SMD: -0.39, 95% CI [-0.53, -0.24], P < 0.00001),引流时间缩短(SMD: -0.51, 95% CI [-0.67, -0.34], P < 0.00001),住院时间缩短(SMD: -0.57, 95% CI [-0.96, -0.18], P = 0.004)。两组手术总时间、术中出血量、血肿相关结局及术后并发症均无差异。结论:LigaSure可显著减少淋巴漏、引流时间和住院时间,但对血清相关结局无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Comparative Evaluation of Laparoscopic Origami Crane Training With 3D and 2D Laparoscopy: Correlation With Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Scores. Virtual Colonoscopy: Retrospective Comparison of the Findings in Supine and Prone Positions. LigaSure in Breast Surgery: A Paradigm Shift With Unresolved Questions. A Novel Surgical Technique for Transsphincteric Anal Fistulas: A Comparison Between the Modified Submucosal Ligation of Fistula Tract (MSLOFT) and the Hybrid Seton Techiniques - A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Evaluating Outcomes of Same Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Colectomy: A Nationwide Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1