Nan Wang, Kai Xie, Haitao Ma, Gaoming Wang, Wei Song
{"title":"Comparing four-hook and double-hook localization needles in preoperative pulmonary nodule positioning: efficacy, safety, and patient perception.","authors":"Nan Wang, Kai Xie, Haitao Ma, Gaoming Wang, Wei Song","doi":"10.1186/s12957-024-03593-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precise preoperative localization is crucial for improving the success rate and reducing the duration of thoracoscopic surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient perception of the four-hook localization needle compared to the traditional double-hook localization needle in the localization of pulmonary nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 207 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Seventy-six patients used a four-hook localization needle preoperatively, while 121 patients used the traditional double-hook needle. Propensity score matching was employed to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups and minimize confounding bias. We compared the surgery success rate, surgical field success rate, complication rate, and post-localization respiratory pain score between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both localization methods achieved a 100% success rate. The four-hook needle had a statistically significant shorter localization time (20.00 min vs. 21.00 min, P = 0.046) and a lower preoperative displacement rate (5.81% vs. 17.36%, P = 0.014) compared to the double-hook needle. Both before and after propensity score matching, the postoperative respiratory pain score was significantly lower in the four-hook group compared to the double-hook group (P < 0.001). After balancing baseline characteristics, univariate (P = 0.036) and multivariate (P = 0.039) logistic regression analyses indicated that the four-hook group had a significantly lower risk of localization complications compared to the double-hook group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The four-hook localization needle outperforms the traditional double-hook needle due to its shorter localization time, lower post-localization respiratory pain score, and reduced displacement rate, making it a simpler and safer option. Furthermore, the four-hook needle effectively reduces the risk of complications, presenting a promising method for preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"22 1","pages":"320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03593-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Precise preoperative localization is crucial for improving the success rate and reducing the duration of thoracoscopic surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient perception of the four-hook localization needle compared to the traditional double-hook localization needle in the localization of pulmonary nodules.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 207 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Seventy-six patients used a four-hook localization needle preoperatively, while 121 patients used the traditional double-hook needle. Propensity score matching was employed to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups and minimize confounding bias. We compared the surgery success rate, surgical field success rate, complication rate, and post-localization respiratory pain score between the two groups.
Results: Both localization methods achieved a 100% success rate. The four-hook needle had a statistically significant shorter localization time (20.00 min vs. 21.00 min, P = 0.046) and a lower preoperative displacement rate (5.81% vs. 17.36%, P = 0.014) compared to the double-hook needle. Both before and after propensity score matching, the postoperative respiratory pain score was significantly lower in the four-hook group compared to the double-hook group (P < 0.001). After balancing baseline characteristics, univariate (P = 0.036) and multivariate (P = 0.039) logistic regression analyses indicated that the four-hook group had a significantly lower risk of localization complications compared to the double-hook group.
Conclusions: The four-hook localization needle outperforms the traditional double-hook needle due to its shorter localization time, lower post-localization respiratory pain score, and reduced displacement rate, making it a simpler and safer option. Furthermore, the four-hook needle effectively reduces the risk of complications, presenting a promising method for preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules.
背景:术前精确定位是提高胸腔镜手术成功率和缩短手术时间的关键。本研究旨在评价四钩定位针与传统双钩定位针在肺结节定位中的疗效、安全性和患者感知。方法:我们对207例接受电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)的患者进行回顾性分析。术前使用四钩定位针76例,使用传统双钩定位针121例。采用倾向评分匹配来平衡两组的基线特征,并尽量减少混杂偏倚。比较两组手术成功率、手术野成功率、并发症发生率及定位后呼吸疼痛评分。结果:两种定位方法的成功率均为100%。与双钩针相比,四钩针定位时间短(20.00 min vs. 21.00 min, P = 0.046),术前移位率低(5.81% vs. 17.36%, P = 0.014),具有统计学意义。倾向评分匹配前后,四钩组术后呼吸痛评分均明显低于双钩组(P结论:四钩定位针定位时间短,定位后呼吸痛评分低,移位率低,优于传统双钩针,是一种更简单、更安全的选择。此外,四钩针有效地降低了并发症的风险,为术前定位肺结节提供了一种很有前景的方法。
期刊介绍:
World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics.
Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.