Acute Pericarditis Manifesting as Persistent Chest Pain Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Missed Diagnosis.

IF 0.4 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Views Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_98_23
Vivek Mohanty, Sourabh Goswami, Rahul Choudhary
{"title":"Acute Pericarditis Manifesting as Persistent Chest Pain Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Missed Diagnosis.","authors":"Vivek Mohanty, Sourabh Goswami, Rahul Choudhary","doi":"10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_98_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a very rare cause of acute pericarditis. It usually develops after a latent period but can present early in case of procedural complications. A high degree of suspicion is required for diagnosis as most cases can be easily missed. Here, we highlight a case of 54-year-old admitted as a case of non-ST elevated myocardial infarction who in view of ongoing chest pain underwent urgent coronary angiography, followed by the primary PCI to left anterior descending artery after which the patient became pain-free. However, 12 h after the procedure, the patient developed severe persistent chest pain with positional and respiratory variation. He was suspected to have reinfarction and treated accordingly but had no symptomatic improvement and was planned for check angiography. However, based on dynamic electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, new echocardiographic findings aided laboratory parameters, he was diagnosed with acute pericarditis. He was treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs following which his pain resolved and ECG returned to baseline after 4 days. His follow-up echocardiography showed complete resolution of pericardial effusion. This case highlights the importance of keeping acute pericarditis as a differential diagnosis of chest pain in PCI patients. A high degree of suspicion is required, as most cases are easily missed to diagnose.</p>","PeriodicalId":32654,"journal":{"name":"Heart Views","volume":"25 2","pages":"110-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Views","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_98_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a very rare cause of acute pericarditis. It usually develops after a latent period but can present early in case of procedural complications. A high degree of suspicion is required for diagnosis as most cases can be easily missed. Here, we highlight a case of 54-year-old admitted as a case of non-ST elevated myocardial infarction who in view of ongoing chest pain underwent urgent coronary angiography, followed by the primary PCI to left anterior descending artery after which the patient became pain-free. However, 12 h after the procedure, the patient developed severe persistent chest pain with positional and respiratory variation. He was suspected to have reinfarction and treated accordingly but had no symptomatic improvement and was planned for check angiography. However, based on dynamic electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, new echocardiographic findings aided laboratory parameters, he was diagnosed with acute pericarditis. He was treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs following which his pain resolved and ECG returned to baseline after 4 days. His follow-up echocardiography showed complete resolution of pericardial effusion. This case highlights the importance of keeping acute pericarditis as a differential diagnosis of chest pain in PCI patients. A high degree of suspicion is required, as most cases are easily missed to diagnose.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后表现为持续胸痛的急性心包炎:一个漏诊。
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是一种非常罕见的急性心包炎的病因。它通常在潜伏期后发展,但在手术并发症的情况下可以早期出现。诊断需要高度怀疑,因为大多数病例很容易被遗漏。在这里,我们重点报道了一例54岁的非st段抬高型心肌梗死患者,鉴于持续的胸痛,他接受了紧急冠状动脉造影,随后进行了一次左前降支PCI,之后患者不再疼痛。然而,手术后12小时,患者出现严重的持续性胸痛,并伴有体位和呼吸变化。患者怀疑再梗死,接受相应治疗,但症状未见改善,计划行血管造影检查。然而,根据动态心电图(ECG)变化,新的超声心动图结果辅助实验室参数,他被诊断为急性心包炎。患者接受非甾体类抗炎药治疗,4天后疼痛缓解,心电图恢复到基线水平。他的后续超声心动图显示心包积液完全消除。本病例强调了将急性心包炎作为PCI患者胸痛鉴别诊断的重要性。需要高度怀疑,因为大多数病例很容易漏诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Views
Heart Views CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Case of Eosinophilic Infiltration of the Right Heart: Diagnostic and Management Considerations. Acute Pericarditis Manifesting as Persistent Chest Pain Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Missed Diagnosis. BaSSaL: Bahrain Stent Save a Life Program: A National Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Initiative in Bahrain. Carcinoid Heart Disease Associated with Primary Ovarian Carcinoid Tumor: A Rare Presentation. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in COVID-19: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center of North India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1