Using ChatGPT in Nursing: Scoping Review of Current Opinions.

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES JMIR Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.2196/54297
You Zhou, Si-Jia Li, Xing-Yi Tang, Yi-Chen He, Hao-Ming Ma, Ao-Qi Wang, Run-Yuan Pei, Mei-Hua Piao
{"title":"Using ChatGPT in Nursing: Scoping Review of Current Opinions.","authors":"You Zhou, Si-Jia Li, Xing-Yi Tang, Yi-Chen He, Hao-Ming Ma, Ao-Qi Wang, Run-Yuan Pei, Mei-Hua Piao","doi":"10.2196/54297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the release of ChatGPT in November 2022, this emerging technology has garnered a lot of attention in various fields, and nursing is no exception. However, to date, no study has comprehensively summarized the status and opinions of using ChatGPT across different nursing fields.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to synthesize the status and opinions of using ChatGPT according to different nursing fields, as well as assess ChatGPT's strengths, weaknesses, and the potential impacts it may cause.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted following the framework of Arksey and O'Malley and guided by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). A comprehensive literature research was conducted in 4 web-based databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINHAL) to identify studies reporting the opinions of using ChatGPT in nursing fields from 2022 to September 3, 2023. The references of the included studies were screened manually to further identify relevant studies. Two authors conducted studies screening, eligibility assessments, and data extraction independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 studies were included. The United States (7 studies), Canada (5 studies), and China (4 studies) were countries with the most publications. In terms of fields of concern, studies mainly focused on \"ChatGPT and nursing education\" (20 studies), \"ChatGPT and nursing practice\" (10 studies), and \"ChatGPT and nursing research, writing, and examination\" (6 studies). Six studies addressed the use of ChatGPT in multiple nursing fields.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As an emerging artificial intelligence technology, ChatGPT has great potential to revolutionize nursing education, nursing practice, and nursing research. However, researchers, institutions, and administrations still need to critically examine its accuracy, safety, and privacy, as well as academic misconduct and potential ethical issues that it may lead to before applying ChatGPT to practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"10 ","pages":"e54297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/54297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the release of ChatGPT in November 2022, this emerging technology has garnered a lot of attention in various fields, and nursing is no exception. However, to date, no study has comprehensively summarized the status and opinions of using ChatGPT across different nursing fields.

Objective: We aim to synthesize the status and opinions of using ChatGPT according to different nursing fields, as well as assess ChatGPT's strengths, weaknesses, and the potential impacts it may cause.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted following the framework of Arksey and O'Malley and guided by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). A comprehensive literature research was conducted in 4 web-based databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINHAL) to identify studies reporting the opinions of using ChatGPT in nursing fields from 2022 to September 3, 2023. The references of the included studies were screened manually to further identify relevant studies. Two authors conducted studies screening, eligibility assessments, and data extraction independently.

Results: A total of 30 studies were included. The United States (7 studies), Canada (5 studies), and China (4 studies) were countries with the most publications. In terms of fields of concern, studies mainly focused on "ChatGPT and nursing education" (20 studies), "ChatGPT and nursing practice" (10 studies), and "ChatGPT and nursing research, writing, and examination" (6 studies). Six studies addressed the use of ChatGPT in multiple nursing fields.

Conclusions: As an emerging artificial intelligence technology, ChatGPT has great potential to revolutionize nursing education, nursing practice, and nursing research. However, researchers, institutions, and administrations still need to critically examine its accuracy, safety, and privacy, as well as academic misconduct and potential ethical issues that it may lead to before applying ChatGPT to practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在护理中使用ChatGPT:当前意见的范围审查。
背景:自2022年11月ChatGPT发布以来,这项新兴技术在各个领域获得了大量关注,护理也不例外。然而,到目前为止,还没有研究全面总结了不同护理领域使用ChatGPT的现状和观点。目的:针对不同的护理领域,综合运用ChatGPT的现状和意见,评估ChatGPT的优势、劣势及可能产生的影响。方法:本范围评价遵循Arksey和O'Malley的框架,并以PRISMA-ScR(系统评价优选报告项目和范围评价扩展元分析)为指导。对4个基于网络的数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和CINHAL)进行了全面的文献研究,以确定2022年至2023年9月3日期间在护理领域使用ChatGPT的研究报告。人工筛选纳入研究的参考文献,进一步识别相关研究。两位作者独立进行了研究筛选、资格评估和数据提取。结果:共纳入30项研究。发表论文最多的国家是美国(7篇)、加拿大(5篇)和中国(4篇)。从关注领域来看,研究主要集中在“ChatGPT与护理教育”(20篇)、“ChatGPT与护理实践”(10篇)、“ChatGPT与护理研究、写作、考试”(6篇)。六项研究探讨了ChatGPT在多个护理领域的应用。结论:ChatGPT作为一种新兴的人工智能技术,在护理教育、护理实践和护理研究领域具有巨大的变革潜力。然而,在ChatGPT应用于实践之前,研究人员、机构和管理部门仍然需要严格检查其准确性、安全性和隐私性,以及可能导致的学术不端行为和潜在的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
AI in the Health Sector: Systematic Review of Key Skills for Future Health Professionals. Understanding Community Health Care Through Problem-Based Learning With Real-Patient Videos: Single-Arm Pre-Post Mixed Methods Study. Assessing Familiarity, Usage Patterns, and Attitudes of Medical Students Toward ChatGPT and Other Chat-Based AI Apps in Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. Collaborative Development of Feedback Concept Maps for Virtual Patient-Based Clinical Reasoning Education: Mixed Methods Study. Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Team-Based Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Simulation Study: Exploratory Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1