Cancer patients' sense of coherence - psycho-oncological consultations and therapeutic alliance as salutogenic factors.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Health Psychology Report Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hpr/189462
Natalia Cecon-Stabel, Ibrahim Demirer, Holger Pfaff, Antje Dresen
{"title":"Cancer patients' sense of coherence - psycho-oncological consultations and therapeutic alliance as salutogenic factors.","authors":"Natalia Cecon-Stabel, Ibrahim Demirer, Holger Pfaff, Antje Dresen","doi":"10.5114/hpr/189462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sense of coherence (SoC), a key concept in the theory of salutogenesis, influences the pathway to promote or maintain health. Utilising psycho-oncological care (PC) can be allocated to the dimension of 'tension management' within this theory. We aimed to evaluate tension management and SoC in the context of PC by analysing whether PC consultations and therapeutic alliance influenced patients' SoC over time.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>Patients who received PC were surveyed twice (after 3 and 12 months) about their care experiences, including therapeutic alliance and SoC. Survey data were matched to care documentation data, which contain consultation dates and sociodemographics. Four stepwise regression analyses were conducted with overall SoC and its subscales of meaningfulness, comprehensibility and manageability at T2 as outcome variables. The predictors are therapeutic alliance and the number of consultations (T1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred patients filled out all three SoC subscales at T1 and T2 and were treated by a psycho-oncologist. Therapeutic bond predicted the change in overall SoC (β = .34, <i>t</i> = 2.26, <i>p</i> = .026) and manageability (β = .47, <i>t</i> =3.02, <i>p</i> = .003). The number of consultations predicted overall SoC (β = .16, <i>t</i> = 2.05, <i>p</i> = .043), meaningfulness (β = .21, <i>t</i> = 2.51, <i>p</i> = .014) and manageability (β = .17, <i>t</i> = 2.07, <i>p</i> = .041).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that part of successful tension management in PC is a good therapeutic bond and the number of needs-oriented consultations utilised. These predictors affect SoC subdimensions differently.</p>","PeriodicalId":44293,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Report","volume":"12 4","pages":"322-336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/189462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sense of coherence (SoC), a key concept in the theory of salutogenesis, influences the pathway to promote or maintain health. Utilising psycho-oncological care (PC) can be allocated to the dimension of 'tension management' within this theory. We aimed to evaluate tension management and SoC in the context of PC by analysing whether PC consultations and therapeutic alliance influenced patients' SoC over time.

Participants and procedure: Patients who received PC were surveyed twice (after 3 and 12 months) about their care experiences, including therapeutic alliance and SoC. Survey data were matched to care documentation data, which contain consultation dates and sociodemographics. Four stepwise regression analyses were conducted with overall SoC and its subscales of meaningfulness, comprehensibility and manageability at T2 as outcome variables. The predictors are therapeutic alliance and the number of consultations (T1).

Results: One hundred patients filled out all three SoC subscales at T1 and T2 and were treated by a psycho-oncologist. Therapeutic bond predicted the change in overall SoC (β = .34, t = 2.26, p = .026) and manageability (β = .47, t =3.02, p = .003). The number of consultations predicted overall SoC (β = .16, t = 2.05, p = .043), meaningfulness (β = .21, t = 2.51, p = .014) and manageability (β = .17, t = 2.07, p = .041).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that part of successful tension management in PC is a good therapeutic bond and the number of needs-oriented consultations utilised. These predictors affect SoC subdimensions differently.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤患者的一致性-心理肿瘤咨询和治疗联盟作为健康因素。
背景:连贯感(SoC)是健康发生理论中的一个重要概念,影响着促进或维持健康的途径。利用心理肿瘤护理(PC)可以在这个理论中分配到“紧张管理”的维度。我们的目的是评估紧张管理和SoC在PC的背景下,通过分析PC咨询和治疗联盟是否影响患者SoC随着时间的推移。参与者和程序:接受PC治疗的患者分别在3个月和12个月后接受两次关于其护理经历的调查,包括治疗联盟和SoC。调查数据与护理文件数据相匹配,其中包含咨询日期和社会人口统计数据。以总SoC及其T2的意义性、可理解性和可管理性三个分量表为结果变量,进行了四次逐步回归分析。预测因子是治疗联盟和咨询次数(T1)。结果:100例患者在T1和T2填写了所有三个SoC亚量表,并接受了一名肿瘤心理医师的治疗。治疗结合预测总体SoC (β = 0.34, t = 2.26, p = 0.026)和可管理性(β = 0.47, t =3.02, p = 0.003)的变化。咨询次数预测总体SoC (β = 0.16, t = 2.05, p = 0.043)、意义(β = 0.21, t = 2.51, p = 0.014)和可管理性(β = 0.17, t = 2.07, p = 0.041)。结论:我们的结果表明,部分成功的张力管理的PC是一个良好的治疗结合和数量的需求导向咨询利用。这些预测因子对SoC子维度的影响不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Report
Health Psychology Report PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cancer patients' sense of coherence - psycho-oncological consultations and therapeutic alliance as salutogenic factors. Short-term effectiveness of music therapy songwriting for mental health outcomes of at-risk parents in the NICU: a study protocol of an international multicenter mixed-methods trial. Psychological factors and health-related quality of life in fibromyalgia patients. Self-reported health profiles of trauma victims with and without psychiatric histories. Model of quality of life in a group of people with chronic low back pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1