Hospital system market share and commercial prices: a cross-sectional approach using price transparency data.

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Health Economics Review Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1186/s13561-024-00580-w
Yuvraj Pathak, David Muhlestein
{"title":"Hospital system market share and commercial prices: a cross-sectional approach using price transparency data.","authors":"Yuvraj Pathak, David Muhlestein","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00580-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this study is to estimate the association between hospital system market share and negotiated prices. Hospital system consolidation has led to many highly concentrated markets where systems can leverage their market share to negotiate higher commercial prices. Recently, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, under its Transparency in Coverage initiative, required health insurers to release all negotiated commercial prices, providing, for the first time, publicly available, nationally representative data on commercial rates. We utilize this newly available data on negotiated prices of healthcare services to show that a hospital with 10% higher market share charges 880-1,180 more per admission.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We used commercial price data for national networks of three large, national insurers and performed a linear regression based on more than 1.3 million negotiated rates across 1,784 hospitals to estimate the association between a hospital's system-level market share and commercial negotiated rates, adjusting for service (DRG), health system, and area level time-invariant characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that a one percentage point increase in hospital system market share is associated with an $88 to $118 higher negotiated rate per admission. All else equal, a hospital that is part of a system with a 10-percentage point higher market share can expect from $880 to $1,180 more per admission relative to a hospital with lower system market share (5.4% to 6.2% of the median price).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings confirm that higher hospital system market share is strongly associated with higher commercial negotiated prices and should aid policymakers and decisionmakers in assessing the impact of various policy options aimed at reducing provider consolidation in the healthcare market.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-024-00580-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The goal of this study is to estimate the association between hospital system market share and negotiated prices. Hospital system consolidation has led to many highly concentrated markets where systems can leverage their market share to negotiate higher commercial prices. Recently, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, under its Transparency in Coverage initiative, required health insurers to release all negotiated commercial prices, providing, for the first time, publicly available, nationally representative data on commercial rates. We utilize this newly available data on negotiated prices of healthcare services to show that a hospital with 10% higher market share charges 880-1,180 more per admission.

Study design: We used commercial price data for national networks of three large, national insurers and performed a linear regression based on more than 1.3 million negotiated rates across 1,784 hospitals to estimate the association between a hospital's system-level market share and commercial negotiated rates, adjusting for service (DRG), health system, and area level time-invariant characteristics.

Results: We find that a one percentage point increase in hospital system market share is associated with an $88 to $118 higher negotiated rate per admission. All else equal, a hospital that is part of a system with a 10-percentage point higher market share can expect from $880 to $1,180 more per admission relative to a hospital with lower system market share (5.4% to 6.2% of the median price).

Conclusion: These findings confirm that higher hospital system market share is strongly associated with higher commercial negotiated prices and should aid policymakers and decisionmakers in assessing the impact of various policy options aimed at reducing provider consolidation in the healthcare market.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院系统市场份额和商业价格:使用价格透明度数据的横断面方法。
背景:本研究的目的是评估医院系统市场占有率与议价之间的关系。医院系统整合导致了许多高度集中的市场,在这些市场中,系统可以利用其市场份额来谈判更高的商业价格。最近,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心根据其覆盖透明度倡议,要求医疗保险公司公布所有谈判的商业价格,首次公开提供全国代表性的商业价格数据。我们利用这一最新的医疗保健服务谈判价格数据来表明,市场份额高出10%的医院每次住院费用高出880-1,180美元。研究设计:我们使用了三家大型国家保险公司的全国网络的商业价格数据,并基于1784家医院的130多万议价率进行了线性回归,以估计医院系统级市场份额与商业议价率之间的关系,调整了服务(DRG)、卫生系统和区域水平的时不变特征。结果:我们发现,医院系统市场份额每增加一个百分点,每次入院的议价率就会提高88至118美元。在其他条件相同的情况下,与市场份额较低的医院相比,市场份额高出10个百分点的医院每次住院费用预计将增加880至1180美元(占中位数价格的5.4%至6.2%)。结论:这些研究结果证实,较高的医院系统市场份额与较高的商业谈判价格密切相关,并应有助于政策制定者和决策者评估旨在减少医疗保健市场中供应商整合的各种政策选择的影响。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Overuse of medical imaging and effects of payer-provider integration: quasi-experimental evidence from Finland. Matters arising: cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Cost-effectiveness of the addition of sintilimab as a first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Chinese healthcare system perspective. The impact of multidimensional poverty on antenatal care service utilisation in Malawi. Business cycle sensitivity of Statutory Health Insurance: evidence from the Czech Republic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1