Nugdeep Uppal, Omar Breik, James Higginson, Heather Goodrum, Hitesh Koria, Stefan Edmondson, Matthew Idle, Prav Praveen, Timothy Martin, Sat Parmar
{"title":"Prosthetic Condyle with Concurrent Microvascular Reconstruction for Mandibular Disarticulation Defects: A Retrospective Series.","authors":"Nugdeep Uppal, Omar Breik, James Higginson, Heather Goodrum, Hitesh Koria, Stefan Edmondson, Matthew Idle, Prav Praveen, Timothy Martin, Sat Parmar","doi":"10.1007/s12663-023-02065-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reconstruction of mandibular disarticulation defects is a challenging area of head and neck surgery, with a variety of options available for replacement of the condylar head. The gold standard is autogenous reconstruction of the condyle-ramus unit. The use of a prosthetic condylar head is controversial, but in challenging cases, and those with a likely poor prognosis it may be considered and can achieve a good functional result. The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of its use in a high volume head and neck reconstructive unit.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of all patients treated at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham who underwent mandibular disarticulation resections and prosthetic condylar reconstruction from January 2008 to December 2019 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective review included 25 patients; 16 for malignant disease (16), osteoradionecrosis (4), osteomyelitis (2), medication related osteonecrosis (1), and secondary reconstruction(2). Free flap reconstruction was performed in 23 cases; 18 bony composite free flaps, 3 patients required double flap reconstruction, and 2 underwent soft tissue flaps only. Mean follow up was 43 months. Prosthesis related complications were encountered in 6 patients, all malignant cases. Four prosthetic condyles required removal due to recurrent infections and glenoid fossa perforation, This appeared to be related to significant surrounding dead space, and limited bony reconstruction. Rate of complications was lowest for non-malignant cases, and patients who had concurrent bony reconstruction extending up the ascending ramus. Functional outcomes were good with majority of patients having a balanced occlusion and oral intake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prosthetic condyle outcomes are best when concurrent bony free flap reconstruction is performed with ascending ramus reconstruction. Avoid prosthetic condyles in cases where the articular disc is removed, and cases where a large amount of dead space is expected around the prosthesis. Careful attention to occlusal factors and vertical support of the reconstruction plate can lead to good functional outcomes. A review of the literature and potential future advances is also presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"23 6","pages":"1379-1390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-02065-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Reconstruction of mandibular disarticulation defects is a challenging area of head and neck surgery, with a variety of options available for replacement of the condylar head. The gold standard is autogenous reconstruction of the condyle-ramus unit. The use of a prosthetic condylar head is controversial, but in challenging cases, and those with a likely poor prognosis it may be considered and can achieve a good functional result. The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of its use in a high volume head and neck reconstructive unit.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients treated at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham who underwent mandibular disarticulation resections and prosthetic condylar reconstruction from January 2008 to December 2019 were included.
Results: This retrospective review included 25 patients; 16 for malignant disease (16), osteoradionecrosis (4), osteomyelitis (2), medication related osteonecrosis (1), and secondary reconstruction(2). Free flap reconstruction was performed in 23 cases; 18 bony composite free flaps, 3 patients required double flap reconstruction, and 2 underwent soft tissue flaps only. Mean follow up was 43 months. Prosthesis related complications were encountered in 6 patients, all malignant cases. Four prosthetic condyles required removal due to recurrent infections and glenoid fossa perforation, This appeared to be related to significant surrounding dead space, and limited bony reconstruction. Rate of complications was lowest for non-malignant cases, and patients who had concurrent bony reconstruction extending up the ascending ramus. Functional outcomes were good with majority of patients having a balanced occlusion and oral intake.
Conclusion: Prosthetic condyle outcomes are best when concurrent bony free flap reconstruction is performed with ascending ramus reconstruction. Avoid prosthetic condyles in cases where the articular disc is removed, and cases where a large amount of dead space is expected around the prosthesis. Careful attention to occlusal factors and vertical support of the reconstruction plate can lead to good functional outcomes. A review of the literature and potential future advances is also presented.
期刊介绍:
This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.