Understanding motivations for sexual communication from a regulatory focus perspective.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Social and Personal Relationships Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-06 DOI:10.1177/02654075241289832
Kendra S Wasson, Uzma S Rehman
{"title":"Understanding motivations for sexual communication from a regulatory focus perspective.","authors":"Kendra S Wasson, Uzma S Rehman","doi":"10.1177/02654075241289832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the overwhelming support for the importance of sexual communication to intimate relationships, there is limited information about what motivates someone to engage in or avoid sexual communication. Motivational frameworks have been applied to various aspects of intimate relationships, serving as strong predictors of different behavioural processes and playing a crucial role in facilitating behavioural change. As such, we aimed to elucidate the motivations for sexual communication and explore how they relate to other aspects of the process of sexual communication. A total of 373 participants were recruited from online crowdsourcing websites across two studies, and they completed online questionnaires using a mixed methods approach. In Study 1, open-ended responses regarding participants' motivations for sexual communication were inductively coded and aligned with the Regulatory Focus Theory, which describes two distinct modes of goal pursuit depending on if the person is focused on growth and advancement (i.e., promotion-focused) or safety and security (prevention-focused). This coding structure was replicated in Study 2, and we expanded the results to examine the predictive ability of the coded motivations. We found that those higher in attachment avoidance were more likely to have prevention-focused motivations, and those with relationship-oriented promotion-focused motivations reported more depth of both sexual and nonsexual communication as well as more relationship and sexual satisfaction. The implications of these findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","volume":"42 1","pages":"178-208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241289832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the overwhelming support for the importance of sexual communication to intimate relationships, there is limited information about what motivates someone to engage in or avoid sexual communication. Motivational frameworks have been applied to various aspects of intimate relationships, serving as strong predictors of different behavioural processes and playing a crucial role in facilitating behavioural change. As such, we aimed to elucidate the motivations for sexual communication and explore how they relate to other aspects of the process of sexual communication. A total of 373 participants were recruited from online crowdsourcing websites across two studies, and they completed online questionnaires using a mixed methods approach. In Study 1, open-ended responses regarding participants' motivations for sexual communication were inductively coded and aligned with the Regulatory Focus Theory, which describes two distinct modes of goal pursuit depending on if the person is focused on growth and advancement (i.e., promotion-focused) or safety and security (prevention-focused). This coding structure was replicated in Study 2, and we expanded the results to examine the predictive ability of the coded motivations. We found that those higher in attachment avoidance were more likely to have prevention-focused motivations, and those with relationship-oriented promotion-focused motivations reported more depth of both sexual and nonsexual communication as well as more relationship and sexual satisfaction. The implications of these findings are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从监管焦点的角度理解性交流的动机。
尽管绝大多数人支持性交流对亲密关系的重要性,但关于什么促使某人进行或避免性交流的信息有限。动机框架已应用于亲密关系的各个方面,作为不同行为过程的有力预测因素,在促进行为改变方面发挥着至关重要的作用。因此,我们的目的是阐明性交流的动机,并探讨它们与性交流过程的其他方面的关系。两项研究共从在线众包网站招募了373名参与者,他们使用混合方法完成了在线问卷调查。在研究1中,关于参与者性交流动机的开放式回答是归纳编码的,并与调节焦点理论相一致,该理论描述了两种不同的目标追求模式,这取决于一个人是专注于成长和进步(即,以促进为重点)还是安全与保障(以预防为重点)。这个编码结构在研究2中被复制,我们扩展了结果来检验编码动机的预测能力。我们发现,那些依恋回避程度较高的人更有可能有以预防为中心的动机,而那些以关系为导向、以促进为中心的动机的人在性和非性交流方面都表现得更深入,关系和性满意度也更高。讨论了这些发现的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
17.90%
发文量
187
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social and Personal Relationships is an international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research on social and personal relationships. JSPR is the leading journal in the field, publishing empirical and theoretical papers on social and personal relationships. It is multidisciplinary in scope, drawing material from the fields of social psychology, clinical psychology, communication, developmental psychology, and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Understanding motivations for sexual communication from a regulatory focus perspective. "It's someone who means a lot to me, and who means even more to mom": Children's views on the romantic partners of their polyamorous parents. You-talk in young adult couples' conflict: Family-of-origin roots and adult relational aggression sequelae. Social ties and social identification: Influences on well-being in young adults. Longitudinal associations among adult attachment orientations, emotion regulation tendencies, and transdiagnostic anxiety and depression symptoms in young adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1