The effectiveness of using animal-themed vacutainers to reduce pain and fear in children during bloodletting

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING International Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101549
Nejla Canbulat Sahiner , Selda Ates Besirik , Alper Yusuf Koroglu , Seda Dilay
{"title":"The effectiveness of using animal-themed vacutainers to reduce pain and fear in children during bloodletting","authors":"Nejla Canbulat Sahiner ,&nbsp;Selda Ates Besirik ,&nbsp;Alper Yusuf Koroglu ,&nbsp;Seda Dilay","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the effects of vacutainers of three different animal characters on pain and fear in children during bloodletting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This randomized controlled trial included 180 children between the ages of 4 and 7 years who required bloodletting for routine control. Children were randomized into two groups: experimental and control groups. Routine bloodletting procedure was applied to those in the control group. Animal characters (butterfly, peacock and rabbit) chosen by children in the experimental group was attached to the vacutainer, and then their blood was drawn. The data were obtained by face-to-face interviews with the child, parent and observer before and after the procedure. Children’s pain and fear/anxiety levels were evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale and the Children’s Fear Scale, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no statistically significant difference between the groups’ pre-test scores with respect to age, BMI, gender, fear/anxiety assessments of the child, parent, and observer. Children in the experimental group had significantly lower pain and fear/anxiety levels after the procedure compared to those in the control group(p &lt; 0.000).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Animal characters (butterfly, peacock and rabbit) attached to the vacutainer is effective in reducing both fear and pain levels in children during bloodletting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24001447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to compare the effects of vacutainers of three different animal characters on pain and fear in children during bloodletting.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial included 180 children between the ages of 4 and 7 years who required bloodletting for routine control. Children were randomized into two groups: experimental and control groups. Routine bloodletting procedure was applied to those in the control group. Animal characters (butterfly, peacock and rabbit) chosen by children in the experimental group was attached to the vacutainer, and then their blood was drawn. The data were obtained by face-to-face interviews with the child, parent and observer before and after the procedure. Children’s pain and fear/anxiety levels were evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale and the Children’s Fear Scale, respectively.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups’ pre-test scores with respect to age, BMI, gender, fear/anxiety assessments of the child, parent, and observer. Children in the experimental group had significantly lower pain and fear/anxiety levels after the procedure compared to those in the control group(p < 0.000).

Conclusions

Animal characters (butterfly, peacock and rabbit) attached to the vacutainer is effective in reducing both fear and pain levels in children during bloodletting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用动物主题的真空容器减少儿童在放血过程中的疼痛和恐惧的有效性。
本研究旨在比较三种不同动物特征的抽真空剂对放血过程中儿童疼痛和恐惧的影响。方法:本随机对照试验纳入180名4 ~ 7岁儿童,常规对照需要放血。将患儿随机分为实验组和对照组。对照组采用常规放血方法。实验组儿童选择的动物人物(蝴蝶、孔雀、兔子)附着在抽真空器上,然后抽血。数据是在手术前后通过与儿童、家长和观察员的面对面访谈获得的。分别使用Wong-Baker FACES疼痛量表和儿童恐惧量表评估儿童的疼痛和恐惧/焦虑水平。结果:各组测试前得分在年龄、BMI、性别、儿童、家长和观察者的恐惧/焦虑评估方面无统计学差异。与对照组相比,实验组的儿童在手术后的疼痛和恐惧/焦虑水平明显降低(p结论:真空容器上附着的动物特征(蝴蝶、孔雀和兔子)有效地减少了儿童在放血过程中的恐惧和疼痛水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Major disaster, profound impact: A qualitative examination of emergency department nurses’ experiences during the 2023 Turkey Maraş earthquake Interventions to retain emergency department nurses: A scoping review Comment on “Telenursing as a tool in emergencies and disasters: A systematic review” Nurses’ perceptions of clinical leadership in the emergency department: A qualitative descriptive study Risk Factors and Preventive Measures of Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma Patients using Trauma Embolic Scoring System: A retrospective chart review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1