Safety of Simultaneous Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1089/lap.2024.0287
Dinul Doluweera, Ovini Silva, Suranjith L Seneviratne, Ishan De Zoysa
{"title":"Safety of Simultaneous Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Dinul Doluweera, Ovini Silva, Suranjith L Seneviratne, Ishan De Zoysa","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Cholelithiasis and inguinal hernias are common surgical conditions that often coexist. Laparoscopic techniques are increasingly used for both cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to systematically review the available evidence on the safety and efficacy of simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases was performed for articles published until March 2024 using specific keywords. Studies meeting predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ten studies comprising 199 patients were included in the review. The mean operative time for combined LC and LIHR ranged from 55 to 157 minutes, with an average hospital stay between 1 and 4 days. The overall complication rate was 22%, with seroma/hematoma formation (6.5%) being most common. There were no reported mortalities or cases of mesh infection. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> This review suggested that simultaneous LC and LIHR is a safe and effective option for patients with both conditions. The combined procedure offers potential benefits such as reduced hospital stay, faster recovery, and cost savings. Although the optimal sequence of surgical procedures for LIHR and LC remains debatable, the risk of mesh infection appears to be minimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"22-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cholelithiasis and inguinal hernias are common surgical conditions that often coexist. Laparoscopic techniques are increasingly used for both cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to systematically review the available evidence on the safety and efficacy of simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases was performed for articles published until March 2024 using specific keywords. Studies meeting predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed. Results: Ten studies comprising 199 patients were included in the review. The mean operative time for combined LC and LIHR ranged from 55 to 157 minutes, with an average hospital stay between 1 and 4 days. The overall complication rate was 22%, with seroma/hematoma formation (6.5%) being most common. There were no reported mortalities or cases of mesh infection. Discussion: This review suggested that simultaneous LC and LIHR is a safe and effective option for patients with both conditions. The combined procedure offers potential benefits such as reduced hospital stay, faster recovery, and cost savings. Although the optimal sequence of surgical procedures for LIHR and LC remains debatable, the risk of mesh infection appears to be minimal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆囊切除术和腹股沟疝修补术的安全性:系统综述。
背景:胆石症和腹股沟疝是常见的外科疾病,经常共存。腹腔镜技术越来越多地用于胆囊切除术和腹股沟疝修补。本研究旨在系统回顾腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)和腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)的安全性和有效性。方法:系统检索PubMed/MEDLINE和谷歌Scholar数据库,检索2024年3月前发表的特定关键词文章。对符合预定纳入和排除标准的研究进行分析。结果:10项研究纳入199例患者。LC和LIHR联合的平均手术时间为55至157分钟,平均住院时间为1至4天。总并发症发生率为22%,以血清肿/血肿形成(6.5%)最为常见。没有死亡或网状物感染的报告。讨论:本综述提示同时LC和LIHR对于两种情况的患者是一种安全有效的选择。这两种联合治疗方法的潜在好处包括缩短住院时间、加快康复速度和节省费用。虽然LIHR和LC的最佳手术顺序仍有争议,但补片感染的风险似乎是最小的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis with Machine Learning-Based Computer Tomography: Diagnostic Reliability and Role in Clinical Management. One Less: Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Facilitates Postoperative Opioid Avoidance. Does the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index Predict Adverse Outcomes after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? A Case-Control Study by the RIRSearch Group. Laparoscopy for Gastrointestinal Perforation in Neonates: A New Animal Model for Training. The Use of 8-mm Powered Articulation Endostapler for Sublobar Resection in Children. Preliminary Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1