Quadriceps Strength Does Not Associate with Gait Adaptation Ability in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Athletic Training Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0266.24
Dr Alyssa Evans-Pickett, Dr Jason R Franz, Dr Darin A Padua, Dr Adam Kiefer, Dr Todd A Schwartz, Dr J Troy Blackburn, Dr Brian Pietrosimone
{"title":"Quadriceps Strength Does Not Associate with Gait Adaptation Ability in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Dr Alyssa Evans-Pickett, Dr Jason R Franz, Dr Darin A Padua, Dr Adam Kiefer, Dr Todd A Schwartz, Dr J Troy Blackburn, Dr Brian Pietrosimone","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0266.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Postoperative muscle weakness contributes to the development of aberrant gait biomechanics that persist following traditional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, it is unknown if quadriceps weakness impedes the ability of ACLR patients to modify gait biomechanics using a real-time gait biofeedback (RTGBF) intervention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose was to determine if quadriceps strength associates with the ability to modify vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during a RTGBF intervention.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-Sectional Study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Research Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>35 individuals with unliateral ACLR (Time since ACLR= 32 ± 16 months; 22 Females, 13 Males).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Peak vGRF was evaluated during a baseline walking trial, and three 250-step randomized RTGBF walking trials which cued an increased average peak vGRF of the baseline walking trial by 5%, 10%, or 15%. The ability to modify gait was reported as changes in pvGRF (ΔpvGRF; BW) and root mean square error (RMSE) of the peak vGRF relative to the feedback target (pvGRF RMSE; BW). We also calculated quadriceps strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant associations between strength (Mean: 2.56 ± 0.75 Nm/kg, Range: 0.84-4.6 Nm/kg) and ΔpvGRF (5% ΔpvGRF: 0.04 ± 0.03 BW, 10% ΔpvGRF: 0.10 ± 0.03 BW, 15% ΔpvGRF: 0.15 ± 0.04 BW) nor strength and RMSE (5% RMSE: 0.04 ± 0.02 BW, 10% RMSE: 0.05 ± 0.02 BW, 15% RMSE: 0.08 ± 0.04 BW) for any of the 3 RTGBF trials (R2: 0.003-0.025; P: 0.37-0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The magnitude of quadriceps strength did not influence the ability to modify gait using RTGBF. These data suggest that it may be unnecessary to wait for quadriceps full strength recovery to capitalize on the benefits of RTGBF following ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0266.24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Postoperative muscle weakness contributes to the development of aberrant gait biomechanics that persist following traditional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, it is unknown if quadriceps weakness impedes the ability of ACLR patients to modify gait biomechanics using a real-time gait biofeedback (RTGBF) intervention.

Objective: The purpose was to determine if quadriceps strength associates with the ability to modify vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during a RTGBF intervention.

Design: Cross-Sectional Study.

Setting: Research Laboratory.

Participants: 35 individuals with unliateral ACLR (Time since ACLR= 32 ± 16 months; 22 Females, 13 Males).

Main outcome measures: Peak vGRF was evaluated during a baseline walking trial, and three 250-step randomized RTGBF walking trials which cued an increased average peak vGRF of the baseline walking trial by 5%, 10%, or 15%. The ability to modify gait was reported as changes in pvGRF (ΔpvGRF; BW) and root mean square error (RMSE) of the peak vGRF relative to the feedback target (pvGRF RMSE; BW). We also calculated quadriceps strength.

Results: There were no significant associations between strength (Mean: 2.56 ± 0.75 Nm/kg, Range: 0.84-4.6 Nm/kg) and ΔpvGRF (5% ΔpvGRF: 0.04 ± 0.03 BW, 10% ΔpvGRF: 0.10 ± 0.03 BW, 15% ΔpvGRF: 0.15 ± 0.04 BW) nor strength and RMSE (5% RMSE: 0.04 ± 0.02 BW, 10% RMSE: 0.05 ± 0.02 BW, 15% RMSE: 0.08 ± 0.04 BW) for any of the 3 RTGBF trials (R2: 0.003-0.025; P: 0.37-0.77).

Conclusions: The magnitude of quadriceps strength did not influence the ability to modify gait using RTGBF. These data suggest that it may be unnecessary to wait for quadriceps full strength recovery to capitalize on the benefits of RTGBF following ACLR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前交叉韧带重建患者的股四头肌力量与步态适应能力无关。
背景:在传统的前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后,术后肌肉无力会导致异常步态生物力学的发展。然而,目前尚不清楚股四头肌无力是否会阻碍ACLR患者使用实时步态生物反馈(RTGBF)干预来改变步态生物力学的能力。目的:目的是确定在RTGBF干预期间,股四头肌力量是否与改变垂直地面反力(vGRF)的能力有关。设计:横断面研究。单位:研究实验室。受试者:单侧ACLR患者35例(ACLR术后时间= 32±16个月;22名女性,13名男性)。主要结局指标:在基线步行试验期间评估峰值vGRF,以及三个250步随机RTGBF步行试验,这些试验提示基线步行试验的平均峰值vGRF增加了5%,10%或15%。改变步态的能力被报道为pvGRF的变化(ΔpvGRF;BW)和峰值vGRF相对于反馈目标的均方根误差(RMSE;BW)。我们还计算了股四头肌的力量。结果:在3项RTGBF试验中,强度(平均值:2.56±0.75 Nm/kg,范围:0.84-4.6 Nm/kg)与ΔpvGRF (5% ΔpvGRF: 0.04±0.03 BW, 10% ΔpvGRF: 0.10±0.03 BW, 15% ΔpvGRF: 0.15±0.04 BW)和RMSE (5% RMSE: 0.04±0.02 BW, 10% RMSE: 0.05±0.02 BW, 15% RMSE: 0.08±0.04 BW)之间均无显著相关性(R2: 0.003-0.025;P: 0.37 - -0.77)。结论:股四头肌力量的大小不影响使用RTGBF改变步态的能力。这些数据表明,在ACLR后,可能没有必要等待股四头肌完全力量恢复来利用RTGBF的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
期刊最新文献
The Running Readiness Scale and Injury in Collegiate Track & Field and Cross Country Athletes. Non-linear interactions of lower limb clinical measures associated with asymptomatic Achilles tendon pathology in ballet dancers. The Association between the Social Vulnerability Index and Access to California High School Athletic Trainers. Don't Sleep on Sleep: A Case Report from a Division I Heptathlete. Service Utilization and Value at an Athletic Training Student Run Clinic for University Employees and Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1