Analysis of a Pilot Study Delivering Cancer Survivorship Education to Community Healthcare Professionals Utilizing the Project ECHO Model.

Journal of CME Pub Date : 2024-11-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/28338073.2024.2433916
Ashley Pariser Davenport, Kevin Johns, Dena Champion, Andrea Roberts, Susan Fugett, Erin Holley, Candice Schreiber, Carolyn J Presley, Jalyn Todd, Andrew Honeychuck, Katherine Hunt, Yurong Lu, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Seuli Bose Brill
{"title":"Analysis of a Pilot Study Delivering Cancer Survivorship Education to Community Healthcare Professionals Utilizing the Project ECHO Model.","authors":"Ashley Pariser Davenport, Kevin Johns, Dena Champion, Andrea Roberts, Susan Fugett, Erin Holley, Candice Schreiber, Carolyn J Presley, Jalyn Todd, Andrew Honeychuck, Katherine Hunt, Yurong Lu, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Seuli Bose Brill","doi":"10.1080/28338073.2024.2433916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the number and needs of cancer survivors grow, innovative ways to enhance survivorship expertise are needed. This pilot study evaluated a 12-week cancer survivorship curriculum delivered to two cohorts of providers at affiliated sites within the Mercy Health System, utilising the Project ECHO® model, on provider self-efficacy (SE), knowledge (KN), and professional improvement (PI). Providers received six 1-hour sessions, informed by provider needs assessment, over 12 weeks. Participants completed pre- and post-session surveys evaluating SE, KN, and PI domains. The average score for survey items overall and within each domain was compared in pre- and post-session survey results. Twenty-six participants completed the baseline survey and 22 completed the post-session survey. For cohort 1, the overall score (0.94, 95% CI [0.45,1.42] <i>p</i> = 0.0023), SE (1.1, [95% CI [0.5,1.7] <i>p</i> = 0.003), and KN domain (1.03, 95% CI [0.45,1.62] <i>p</i> = 0.0036) scores significantly increased. For cohort 2, the overall score (0.617, 95% CI [0.042,1.193] <i>p</i> = 0.0378), SE (0.728, 95% CI [0.048,1.407] <i>p</i> = 0.0379), and KN domains (0.665, 95% CI [0.041,1.289] <i>p</i> = 0.0387) increased significantly. The PI score did not change for either cohort (PI -0.09, 95% CI [-0.67, 0.49] <i>p</i> = 0.726 and 0.000, 95% CI [-0.790,0.790] <i>p</i> > 0.999). This Cancer Survivorship ECHO pilot resulted in a statistically significant increase in provider self-efficacy and knowledge. All 22 participants rated the Cancer Survivorship ECHO pilot experience as having a positive (greater than neutral) result on their training. The Cancer Survivorship ECHO model may serve as a scalable strategy for building cancer survivorship care capacity in community-based oncology practices by equipping multidisciplinary teams to meet the needs of cancer survivors within their communities. Further research is needed to assess the implementation of this model in novel settings and evaluate its impact on patient outcomes and professional improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":73675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of CME","volume":"13 1","pages":"2433916"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/28338073.2024.2433916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the number and needs of cancer survivors grow, innovative ways to enhance survivorship expertise are needed. This pilot study evaluated a 12-week cancer survivorship curriculum delivered to two cohorts of providers at affiliated sites within the Mercy Health System, utilising the Project ECHO® model, on provider self-efficacy (SE), knowledge (KN), and professional improvement (PI). Providers received six 1-hour sessions, informed by provider needs assessment, over 12 weeks. Participants completed pre- and post-session surveys evaluating SE, KN, and PI domains. The average score for survey items overall and within each domain was compared in pre- and post-session survey results. Twenty-six participants completed the baseline survey and 22 completed the post-session survey. For cohort 1, the overall score (0.94, 95% CI [0.45,1.42] p = 0.0023), SE (1.1, [95% CI [0.5,1.7] p = 0.003), and KN domain (1.03, 95% CI [0.45,1.62] p = 0.0036) scores significantly increased. For cohort 2, the overall score (0.617, 95% CI [0.042,1.193] p = 0.0378), SE (0.728, 95% CI [0.048,1.407] p = 0.0379), and KN domains (0.665, 95% CI [0.041,1.289] p = 0.0387) increased significantly. The PI score did not change for either cohort (PI -0.09, 95% CI [-0.67, 0.49] p = 0.726 and 0.000, 95% CI [-0.790,0.790] p > 0.999). This Cancer Survivorship ECHO pilot resulted in a statistically significant increase in provider self-efficacy and knowledge. All 22 participants rated the Cancer Survivorship ECHO pilot experience as having a positive (greater than neutral) result on their training. The Cancer Survivorship ECHO model may serve as a scalable strategy for building cancer survivorship care capacity in community-based oncology practices by equipping multidisciplinary teams to meet the needs of cancer survivors within their communities. Further research is needed to assess the implementation of this model in novel settings and evaluate its impact on patient outcomes and professional improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Future of Generative AI in Continuing Professional Development (CPD): Crowdsourcing the Alliance Community. Unravelling Orthopaedic Surgeons' Perceptions and Adoption of Generative AI Technologies. An Overview of Continuing Medical Education/Continuing Professional Development Systems in the Middle East and North Africa: A Mixed Methods Assessment. Revolutionising Faculty Development and Continuing Medical Education Through AI-Generated Videos. An Overview of Continuing Medical Education/Continuing Professional Development Systems in Europe: A Mixed Methods Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1