Effectiveness of the Sub-Acute Care for Frail Elderly (SAFE) Transitional Care Unit on Short-Term Functional Independence in Frail Older Patients Discharged from Hospital.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.5770/cgj.27.721
Benoît Robert, Annie H Sun, Danielle Sinden, Anan B Eddeen, Maya Murmann, Amy T Hsu
{"title":"Effectiveness of the Sub-Acute Care for Frail Elderly (SAFE) Transitional Care Unit on Short-Term Functional Independence in Frail Older Patients Discharged from Hospital.","authors":"Benoît Robert, Annie H Sun, Danielle Sinden, Anan B Eddeen, Maya Murmann, Amy T Hsu","doi":"10.5770/cgj.27.721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transitional care programs help improve continuity of care and post-discharge outcomes for frail older adults who are hospitalized. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of a transitional care model, based in a long-term care (LTC) home, on the functional independence of older hospitalized patients post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a propensity-score matched cohort, whereby cases comprised patients who were admitted to a transitional care program-called the Sub-Acute Care for Frail Elderly (SAFE) Unit-following a hospitalization between March 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019. Controls were matched to Usual Care patients discharged from hospitals within the same health region and accrual period who did not receive transitional care in the SAFE Unit. Outcomes included acute care, LTC, and home care use within six-month post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to Usual Care, SAFE Unit patients were less likely to be admitted into an LTC home (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.86) within six months post-discharge. Additionally, on average, SAFE Unit patients spent 34 fewer days in LTC homes than controls. SAFE Unit patients also incurred significantly fewer home care service days (median: 52 days, IQR: 12-132 days) than Usual Care patients (median: 65.5 days, IQR: 19-158 days), particularly in terms of their reliance on general nursing and personal support. Both groups had similar risks of six-month hospital readmission and having an ED visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rehabilitative and restorative-focused care provided through transitional programs, such as the SAFE Unit, have the potential to enable independent living for older hospitalized patients discharged to the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"27 4","pages":"418-429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.27.721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transitional care programs help improve continuity of care and post-discharge outcomes for frail older adults who are hospitalized. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of a transitional care model, based in a long-term care (LTC) home, on the functional independence of older hospitalized patients post-discharge.

Methods: We used a propensity-score matched cohort, whereby cases comprised patients who were admitted to a transitional care program-called the Sub-Acute Care for Frail Elderly (SAFE) Unit-following a hospitalization between March 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019. Controls were matched to Usual Care patients discharged from hospitals within the same health region and accrual period who did not receive transitional care in the SAFE Unit. Outcomes included acute care, LTC, and home care use within six-month post-discharge.

Results: Compared to Usual Care, SAFE Unit patients were less likely to be admitted into an LTC home (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.86) within six months post-discharge. Additionally, on average, SAFE Unit patients spent 34 fewer days in LTC homes than controls. SAFE Unit patients also incurred significantly fewer home care service days (median: 52 days, IQR: 12-132 days) than Usual Care patients (median: 65.5 days, IQR: 19-158 days), particularly in terms of their reliance on general nursing and personal support. Both groups had similar risks of six-month hospital readmission and having an ED visit.

Conclusion: Rehabilitative and restorative-focused care provided through transitional programs, such as the SAFE Unit, have the potential to enable independent living for older hospitalized patients discharged to the community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚急性护理体弱老年人(SAFE)过渡护理单元对出院体弱老年患者短期功能独立的影响
背景:过渡性护理方案有助于改善住院的体弱老年人护理的连续性和出院后的预后。在本研究中,我们考察了一种基于长期护理(LTC)之家的过渡性护理模式对老年住院患者出院后功能独立性的有效性。方法:我们使用了一个倾向评分匹配的队列,其中的病例包括在2018年3月1日至2019年6月30日住院后进入过渡性护理计划(称为亚急性护理虚弱老年人(SAFE)单元)的患者。对照组与同一卫生区域和应计期间内从医院出院的常规护理患者相匹配,这些患者没有在安全病房接受过渡护理。结果包括出院后6个月内的急性护理、LTC和家庭护理使用情况。结果:与常规护理相比,安全病房患者出院后6个月内入院LTC的可能性更低(RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.86)。此外,与对照组相比,安全单元患者在LTC家中平均少呆了34天。安全病房患者的家庭护理服务天数(中位数:52天,IQR: 12-132天)也明显少于常规护理患者(中位数:65.5天,IQR: 19-158天),特别是在他们对一般护理和个人支持的依赖方面。两组再次住院6个月和急诊科就诊的风险相似。结论:通过过渡方案提供的康复和恢复性护理,如安全单元,有可能使出院到社区的老年住院患者能够独立生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
期刊最新文献
"How Can We Help You?" Older Adults' and Care Partners' Perspectives on Improving Care in Hospital: A Mixed Methods Study. Alternate Level of Care Patients in Canada: a Scoping Review. Balancing Patients' Eating Habits with Planetary Health-Pilot Study to Decrease Food Waste with Vegetarian Lunches using a Quality Improvement Approach. Canadian Clinical Guidelines on Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults. Determinants of First Practice Location among Canadian Geriatric Medicine Trainees and Recent Graduates: Findings of a Cross-sectional Survey in 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1