Agape: A Syntactic-Based Analysis Method for Automatic API Connection Points Discovery in Systems-of-Information Systems

IF 4.4 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Systems Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1109/JSYST.2024.3465391
Marcos Borges;Lincoln Rocha;Paulo Henrique Mendes Maia;Rodrigo Pereira dos Santos
{"title":"Agape: A Syntactic-Based Analysis Method for Automatic API Connection Points Discovery in Systems-of-Information Systems","authors":"Marcos Borges;Lincoln Rocha;Paulo Henrique Mendes Maia;Rodrigo Pereira dos Santos","doi":"10.1109/JSYST.2024.3465391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Establishing interoperability links is a significant challenge in systems-of-information systems (SoIS) engineering. Even with constituent systems (CS) interfaces documentation, achieving such links is a difficult, time-consuming, and error-prone task that requires attention from CS developers, especially if it is performed manually. In order to contribute to this task, we propose Agape, a semiautomatic method using syntactic similarity analysis of API attributes to identify potential CS connection points. We implemented the AgapeTool tool based on the method and performed two-fold evaluations. In the preliminary evaluation, we executed a controlled experiment to evaluate the performance of AgapeTool and empirically define the best similarity algorithms and thresholds for the task of identifying connection points between two well known API. In the evaluation, we use AgapeTool in two cases involving four CS API from a SoIS of a global computer manufacturer. Then, we conducted semistructured interviews with five experienced developers of the target SoIS to evaluate the outcomes. In practice, the results reveal that AgapeTool is effective in both environments, and API syntactic similarity analysis is efficient for identifying CS interoperability links. From a research point, the combination of syntactic and semantic analyzes looks promising for more accurate and reliable results.","PeriodicalId":55017,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Systems Journal","volume":"18 4","pages":"2052-2061"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10705416/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Establishing interoperability links is a significant challenge in systems-of-information systems (SoIS) engineering. Even with constituent systems (CS) interfaces documentation, achieving such links is a difficult, time-consuming, and error-prone task that requires attention from CS developers, especially if it is performed manually. In order to contribute to this task, we propose Agape, a semiautomatic method using syntactic similarity analysis of API attributes to identify potential CS connection points. We implemented the AgapeTool tool based on the method and performed two-fold evaluations. In the preliminary evaluation, we executed a controlled experiment to evaluate the performance of AgapeTool and empirically define the best similarity algorithms and thresholds for the task of identifying connection points between two well known API. In the evaluation, we use AgapeTool in two cases involving four CS API from a SoIS of a global computer manufacturer. Then, we conducted semistructured interviews with five experienced developers of the target SoIS to evaluate the outcomes. In practice, the results reveal that AgapeTool is effective in both environments, and API syntactic similarity analysis is efficient for identifying CS interoperability links. From a research point, the combination of syntactic and semantic analyzes looks promising for more accurate and reliable results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息系统中API连接点自动发现的一种基于句法的分析方法
建立互操作性链接是信息系统工程中的一个重大挑战。即使使用组成系统(CS)接口文档,实现这样的链接也是一项困难、耗时且容易出错的任务,需要CS开发人员的注意,特别是在手动执行的情况下。为了完成这项任务,我们提出了Agape,这是一种利用API属性的语法相似度分析来识别潜在CS连接点的半自动方法。我们基于该方法实现了AgapeTool工具,并进行了两次评估。在初步评估中,我们执行了一个对照实验来评估AgapeTool的性能,并根据经验定义了识别两个已知API之间连接点的最佳相似度算法和阈值。在评估中,我们在两个案例中使用AgapeTool,涉及来自全球计算机制造商SoIS的四个CS API。然后,我们对目标SoIS的五位经验丰富的开发人员进行了半结构化访谈,以评估结果。实践结果表明,AgapeTool在两种环境下都是有效的,API语法相似度分析对于识别CS互操作性链接是有效的。从研究的角度来看,将句法和语义相结合的分析有望获得更准确、更可靠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Systems Journal
IEEE Systems Journal 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
6.80%
发文量
572
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: This publication provides a systems-level, focused forum for application-oriented manuscripts that address complex systems and system-of-systems of national and global significance. It intends to encourage and facilitate cooperation and interaction among IEEE Societies with systems-level and systems engineering interest, and to attract non-IEEE contributors and readers from around the globe. Our IEEE Systems Council job is to address issues in new ways that are not solvable in the domains of the existing IEEE or other societies or global organizations. These problems do not fit within traditional hierarchical boundaries. For example, disaster response such as that triggered by Hurricane Katrina, tsunamis, or current volcanic eruptions is not solvable by pure engineering solutions. We need to think about changing and enlarging the paradigm to include systems issues.
期刊最新文献
IEEE Systems Journal Information for Authors IEEE Systems Council Information Joint Optimization of UAV Trajectory and Number of Reflecting Elements for UAV-Carried IRS-Assisted Data Collection in WSNs Under Hover Priority Scheme Event-Triggered Distributed Model Predictive Control for LFC of Interconnected Power System Dynamic Event-Triggered Consensus of Matrix-Weighted Linear Multiagent Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1