Quantification of Drill Hole Damages in CFRP Laminates Using High-Resolution Ultrasonic Testing

David A. Jack;Pruthul Kokkada Ravindranath;Khaled Matalgah;Trevor Fleck
{"title":"Quantification of Drill Hole Damages in CFRP Laminates Using High-Resolution Ultrasonic Testing","authors":"David A. Jack;Pruthul Kokkada Ravindranath;Khaled Matalgah;Trevor Fleck","doi":"10.1109/OJIM.2024.3487238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work investigates the detection and quantification of the damages incurred during the drilling process on a carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite using nondestructive evaluation techniques of full waveform captured ultrasonic testing (UT) and comparing the damage quantification with X-ray micro-computed tomography (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\nCT) scan data. A methodology is presented to extract the 3-D damage surface from the captured UT data obtained from a 20-MHz spherically focused transducer, which can be later used for a structural simulation for the load reduction due to the presence of delaminations. Three samples are fabricated to demonstrate the methodology as well as the damage profile from different fabrication methods. Two samples are prepared using a precision drill press, while the third sample is drilled with a programmable drilling machine with a controlled feed rate. An immersion inspection system utilizing a spherically focused ultrasound transducer is used to capture the full waveform data from which the maximum effective radius of the drilled hole as well as the drilling-induced damage is extracted. The effective damage radius is measured through the thickness of the sample and compared to the \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\nCT data sets. A relation between the drilling practices as well as the sample quality to the average error between the analyzed UT and \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\nCT data sets is presented, with an absolute relative error between 1.2% and 6.0%.","PeriodicalId":100630,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Instrumentation and Measurement","volume":"3 ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10737247","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Instrumentation and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10737247/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work investigates the detection and quantification of the damages incurred during the drilling process on a carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite using nondestructive evaluation techniques of full waveform captured ultrasonic testing (UT) and comparing the damage quantification with X-ray micro-computed tomography ( $\mu $ CT) scan data. A methodology is presented to extract the 3-D damage surface from the captured UT data obtained from a 20-MHz spherically focused transducer, which can be later used for a structural simulation for the load reduction due to the presence of delaminations. Three samples are fabricated to demonstrate the methodology as well as the damage profile from different fabrication methods. Two samples are prepared using a precision drill press, while the third sample is drilled with a programmable drilling machine with a controlled feed rate. An immersion inspection system utilizing a spherically focused ultrasound transducer is used to capture the full waveform data from which the maximum effective radius of the drilled hole as well as the drilling-induced damage is extracted. The effective damage radius is measured through the thickness of the sample and compared to the $\mu $ CT data sets. A relation between the drilling practices as well as the sample quality to the average error between the analyzed UT and $\mu $ CT data sets is presented, with an absolute relative error between 1.2% and 6.0%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal Variance Image Reconstruction for Thermographic Inspections Fault Detection in an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator Using Polyscale Complexity Measures and Bayesian Classification Baseline-Free Damage Imaging for Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Lap Joint Using Ultrasonic-Guided Waves Quantification of Drill Hole Damages in CFRP Laminates Using High-Resolution Ultrasonic Testing Spiking Neural Networks for Energy-Efficient Acoustic Emission-Based Monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1