An integrative framework for the mechanisms underlying mindfulness-induced cognitive change

IF 16.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1038/s44159-024-00374-1
Luis Cásedas, Jonathan W. Schooler, Miguel A. Vadillo, Juan Lupiáñez
{"title":"An integrative framework for the mechanisms underlying mindfulness-induced cognitive change","authors":"Luis Cásedas, Jonathan W. Schooler, Miguel A. Vadillo, Juan Lupiáñez","doi":"10.1038/s44159-024-00374-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mindfulness meditation has drawn increasing attention in psychological research over the past two decades, including growing interest in its potential cognitive benefits. Meta-analytic evidence suggests that mindfulness training might improve cognitive performance, but the mechanisms underlying these benefits have not been fully characterized. In this Perspective, we integrate empirical and theoretical advances in mindfulness research with established knowledge about the mechanisms and limitations of cognitive training. We introduce the capacity–efficiency mindfulness (CEM) framework, which posits that mindfulness training modulates cognitive function by minimizing cognitive–affective interference during task performance, rather than by increasing overall cognitive resources. This framework emphasizes the critical role of mind-wandering and negative affect in disrupting efficient cognitive control and outlines key mechanisms by which mindfulness training might mitigate these factors. We review initial evidence in support of the framework, discuss its predictions and suggest research directions to test them. Mindfulness meditation improves performance in some cognitive domains, but the mechanisms that underlie this change are unclear. In this Perspective, Cásedas and colleagues synthesize mindfulness meditation and cognitive training frameworks and suggest that mindfulness training improves cognitive efficiency by reducing mind-wandering and negative affect.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"3 12","pages":"821-834"},"PeriodicalIF":16.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-024-00374-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mindfulness meditation has drawn increasing attention in psychological research over the past two decades, including growing interest in its potential cognitive benefits. Meta-analytic evidence suggests that mindfulness training might improve cognitive performance, but the mechanisms underlying these benefits have not been fully characterized. In this Perspective, we integrate empirical and theoretical advances in mindfulness research with established knowledge about the mechanisms and limitations of cognitive training. We introduce the capacity–efficiency mindfulness (CEM) framework, which posits that mindfulness training modulates cognitive function by minimizing cognitive–affective interference during task performance, rather than by increasing overall cognitive resources. This framework emphasizes the critical role of mind-wandering and negative affect in disrupting efficient cognitive control and outlines key mechanisms by which mindfulness training might mitigate these factors. We review initial evidence in support of the framework, discuss its predictions and suggest research directions to test them. Mindfulness meditation improves performance in some cognitive domains, but the mechanisms that underlie this change are unclear. In this Perspective, Cásedas and colleagues synthesize mindfulness meditation and cognitive training frameworks and suggest that mindfulness training improves cognitive efficiency by reducing mind-wandering and negative affect.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正念诱导的认知改变机制的综合框架
在过去的二十年里,正念冥想在心理学研究中引起了越来越多的关注,包括对其潜在认知益处的兴趣日益浓厚。元分析证据表明,正念训练可能会改善认知表现,但这些好处背后的机制尚未得到充分表征。在这个视角中,我们将正念研究的经验和理论进展与认知训练的机制和局限性的既定知识相结合。我们引入了能力-效率正念(CEM)框架,该框架假设正念训练通过最小化任务执行过程中的认知情感干扰来调节认知功能,而不是通过增加整体认知资源。这个框架强调了走神和负面情绪在破坏有效认知控制方面的关键作用,并概述了正念训练可能减轻这些因素的关键机制。我们回顾了支持该框架的初步证据,讨论了其预测并提出了测试它们的研究方向。正念冥想可以提高某些认知领域的表现,但这种变化背后的机制尚不清楚。在这个观点中,Cásedas和同事综合了正念冥想和认知训练框架,并认为正念训练通过减少走神和负面影响来提高认知效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reply to ‘Structure-based dissociations provide agnostic evidence to the multiple-systems debate’ Single and multiple systems in probabilistic categorization Structure-based dissociations provide agnostic evidence to the multiple-systems debate Reply to ‘Single and multiple systems in probabilistic categorization’ Attachment as a target mechanism in the mental health of child refugees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1