Breadth and Depth of Patient and Caregiver Supportive Services in Community Oncology (WF-1803CD).

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Psycho‐Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/pon.70034
Laurie E McLouth, Katherine R Sterba, Anna C Snavely, Kathryn E Weaver, Emily V Dressler, Erin E Kent, Christian S Adonizio, Suzanne C Danhauer, Charles Kuzma, Timothy Moore, Chandylen L Nightingale
{"title":"Breadth and Depth of Patient and Caregiver Supportive Services in Community Oncology (WF-1803CD).","authors":"Laurie E McLouth, Katherine R Sterba, Anna C Snavely, Kathryn E Weaver, Emily V Dressler, Erin E Kent, Christian S Adonizio, Suzanne C Danhauer, Charles Kuzma, Timothy Moore, Chandylen L Nightingale","doi":"10.1002/pon.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providing supportive services to patients and their caregivers is essential to quality cancer care, yet the depth, availability, and infrastructure underlying these services remains unknown in community practice. We assessed these factors among practices within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) to guide priorities for comprehensive supportive service(s) development and inform implementation of evidence-based interventions in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Supportive care leaders at NCORP practices completed online surveys regarding availability of services to patients and caregivers within seven domains, service infrastructure (e.g., staffing, technology), and implementation recommendations for caregiver-specific services. Primary outcomes were the proportion of practices offering at least one service in each domain to both populations and the proportion offering caregiver training/education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 103 participating practice groups, only 15.5% offered at least one service in each domain to both populations; 21.4% offered caregiver training/education. Psychological (83.5%) and spiritual/religious (75.7%) services were most widely available to both; health promotion (28.2%) services were least available to both. Services offered were largely available on-site with dedicated staff; caregiver-specific services were nearly always off-site and typically self-pay. Practices most often used the patient health portal to communicate with patients and caregivers (54.4%). Only 28.9% provided bilingual staff for services. Social workers (35.7%) and navigators (34.7%) were recommended to support caregiver services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To meet national recommendations for supportive service provision, practices should invest in caregiver education/training programs, expand health promotion programs, and increase interpretation services. Future interventions should leverage existing resources (e.g., recommended staff, patient portal).</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"33 12","pages":"e70034"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Providing supportive services to patients and their caregivers is essential to quality cancer care, yet the depth, availability, and infrastructure underlying these services remains unknown in community practice. We assessed these factors among practices within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) to guide priorities for comprehensive supportive service(s) development and inform implementation of evidence-based interventions in clinical practice.

Methods: Supportive care leaders at NCORP practices completed online surveys regarding availability of services to patients and caregivers within seven domains, service infrastructure (e.g., staffing, technology), and implementation recommendations for caregiver-specific services. Primary outcomes were the proportion of practices offering at least one service in each domain to both populations and the proportion offering caregiver training/education.

Results: Of the 103 participating practice groups, only 15.5% offered at least one service in each domain to both populations; 21.4% offered caregiver training/education. Psychological (83.5%) and spiritual/religious (75.7%) services were most widely available to both; health promotion (28.2%) services were least available to both. Services offered were largely available on-site with dedicated staff; caregiver-specific services were nearly always off-site and typically self-pay. Practices most often used the patient health portal to communicate with patients and caregivers (54.4%). Only 28.9% provided bilingual staff for services. Social workers (35.7%) and navigators (34.7%) were recommended to support caregiver services.

Conclusions: To meet national recommendations for supportive service provision, practices should invest in caregiver education/training programs, expand health promotion programs, and increase interpretation services. Future interventions should leverage existing resources (e.g., recommended staff, patient portal).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区肿瘤患者和护理人员支持服务的广度和深度(WF-1803CD)。
背景:为患者及其护理人员提供支持性服务对于高质量的癌症治疗至关重要,然而,在社区实践中,这些服务的深度、可用性和基础设施仍然未知。我们在国家癌症研究所社区肿瘤研究计划(NCORP)的实践中评估了这些因素,以指导综合支持服务开发的优先级,并为临床实践中循证干预措施的实施提供信息。方法:NCORP实践的支持性护理领导完成了在线调查,内容涉及七个领域的患者和护理人员的服务可用性,服务基础设施(例如,人员配置,技术)和针对护理人员特定服务的实施建议。主要结果是在每个领域向两个人群提供至少一种服务的实践比例和提供护理人员培训/教育的比例。结果:在103个参与的实践组中,只有15.5%的人在每个领域向两个人群提供至少一项服务;21.4%提供护理人员培训/教育。心理服务(83.5%)和精神/宗教服务(75.7%)对这两类人最广泛;两者获得健康促进服务最少(28.2%)。所提供的服务大多在现场提供,有专门的工作人员;针对护理人员的服务几乎总是不在现场,而且通常是自费的。实践最常使用患者健康门户网站与患者和护理人员进行沟通(54.4%)。只有28.9%提供双语人员提供服务。社会工作者(35.7%)和导航员(34.7%)被推荐支持照顾者服务。结论:为了满足国家对支持性服务提供的建议,实践应投资于护理人员教育/培训计划,扩大健康促进计划,并增加解释服务。未来的干预措施应利用现有资源(如推荐的工作人员、患者门户网站)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
期刊最新文献
Post-Treatment Cancer Survivors' Experience of Social Reintegration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Psychosocial Correlates of Death Anxiety in Advanced Cancer: A Scoping Review. Connections After Cancer: Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors' Perspectives on Forming New Friendships After Cancer. Systematic Review of Pain Assessment Measures Used in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. A Systematic Review of Cancer-Related Trauma and Growth in Caregivers Across the Lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1