Psycho‐Oncology最新文献

Objective: There is an increasing amount of literature acknowledging the significance of addressing the psychosocial impact of prostate cancer (PCa) on couples' relationship functioning and well-being. However, research on developing and evaluating psychological interventions for individuals and couples coping with PCa remains limited. This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate and synthesise the effectiveness of psychological interventions in improving the relationship functioning of couples affected by PCa and to identify the moderating role of several methodological characteristics of intervention studies.

Methods: Five databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Global Health, and Cochrane Library were searched up to September 2024. Twenty-three studies with randomised trials and a total sample size of 3333 participants were included. Random effects meta-analyses for relationship functioning, sensitivity analysis for outliers, and publication bias analysis were conducted.

Results: The results showed that psychological interventions had a non-significant trivial effect (g = 0.06, p = 0.328) on improving relationship functioning among couples coping with PCa. Subgroup analyses identified two potential moderators: firstly, the intervention format (conjoint vs. individual; p = 0.005), and secondly, the intervention frequency (session number < 6 vs. session number ≥ 6; p = 0.004).

Conclusions: The findings suggest that more high-quality intervention studies are needed to improve the relationship functioning of those affected by PCa, with screening processes to select more representative samples at entry. The implications for clinical practice highlight the need to tailor interventions to the specific needs of couples coping with PCa.

Objective: Influenced by their life stage and socio-cultural background, young and middle-aged cancer patients in China may experience unique psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigated the severity, problems, and associated factors of psychological distress among young and middle-aged cancer patients.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on young and middle-aged cancer patients aged 18-59 who were treated at a radiotherapy center from February 2022 to September 2023. Participants' psychological distress severity and problems were measured using the Distress Thermometer and the Problem List. Binary logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors, as well as PL items, associated with clinically significant psychological distress in young and middle-aged cancer patients.

Results: Among the 510 participants, 102 (20.0%) had DT scores ≥ 4, reported an average of 3.36 ± 3.78 problems, and 360 (70.6%) reported at least one problem. The five most frequently reported problems were worry, no time and energy to take care of children/elderly people, memory loss/lack of concentration, appearance/shape, and work/school. Annual household income, self-reported loneliness, nervousness, loss of interest in daily activities, eating, and nausea were associated with DT scores ≥ 4.

Conclusions: One-fifth of young and middle-aged cancer patients experienced clinically significant psychological distress. Greater attention should be paid to patients with lower household incomes and those who self-report loneliness, nervousness, loss of interest in daily activities, eating, and nausea, providing targeted support to alleviate psychological distress.

Background: Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in improving depression in patients with cancer. However, diversity exists in the CBT delivery formats, and the optimal delivery format remains unconfirmed.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of different delivery formats of CBT interventions on depression in patients with cancer.

Design: Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Data source: Six databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PsycINFO, were searched from inception to May 30, 2024.

Methods: Two reviewers independently conducted study inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. A pairwise meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis were performed sequentially to determine the efficacy of CBT delivery formats for improving depression in patients with cancer.

Results: A total of 34 randomized controlled trials involving six delivery formats of CBT were included. Face-to-face group CBT (SMD = -0.88, 95% CI [-1.33, -0.44]), internet-based individual CBT (SMD = -0.49, 95% CI [-0.92, -0.06]), app-based individual CBT (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI [-1.45, -0.18]), and combined delivery formats of CBT for individual (SMD = -0.35, 95% CI [-0.62, -0.09]) were significantly more effective than the inactive control. The ranking probabilities revealed that face-to-face group CBT (P-score = 0.86), app-based individual CBT (P-score = 0.74) and internet-based individual CBT (P-score = 0.57) were the three most effective delivery formats of CBT.

Conclusions: This study revealed the efficacy ranking of different CBT delivery formats in improving depression in patients with cancer. These findings are expected to provide evidence-based support for future research and clinical decision making for improving depression in patients with cancer.

Trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024553977).

Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer experience long-term consequences into survivorship that impact quality of life, including mental health symptoms, substance use, and persistent pain. Given the elevated rates of pain, AYA cancer survivors are at increased risk for opioid pain medication (OPM) exposure, increasing risk for opioid-related negative consequences, particularly for those with mental health symptoms. Minimal research has documented that a considerable proportion of AYAs with cancer receive OPM that continues into survivorship, yet the lack of consensus on the definition of problematic opioid use coupled with the high clinical need for OPM makes it particularly challenging to understand the impact of OPM use in this population.

Aims: Therefore, the current study examined differences in opioid pain medication use, use behaviors, and motives between AYA cancer survivors and non-cancer controls.

Methods: Using the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, we tested the impact of OPM use behaviors and motives on depressive symptoms and mental healthcare utilization variables.

Results: Results show that, compared to non-cancer controls, AYA cancer survivors evince higher rates of opioid use, behaviors, and pain relief motives. Within the cancer survivor group only, there were differential patterns of associations between OPM behaviors, motives, depressive symptoms, and mental healthcare utilization, with using opioid pain medication for emotion coping/to get high showed the largest effect sizes with outcome variables.

Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of moving beyond use itself and examining how and why AYAs with cancer are using opioids to understand potential negative consequences.

Background: Although scanxiety is common and impactful for people with advanced lung cancer, few interventions address this psychosocial concern.

Aims: To create a stress management program for scanxiety.

Methods: We conducted a structured intervention adaptation process guided by the ADAPT-ITT framework. We tailored materials from an existing evidence-based program, drafted additional modules, and obtained feedback on initial content. Following content revisions and website prototype development, 21 participants (patients with metastatic lung cancer, n = 8; family members, n = 3; clinicians, n = 10) reviewed the program. Participants rated the program's acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure; AIM), feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure; FIM), appropriateness (Appropriateness of Intervention Measure; IAM), helpfulness (module Likert ratings), and usability (Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire; PSSUQ), and completed semi-structured interviews.

Results: Data revealed positive impressions of the program. Participants rated the program as acceptable (89%), feasible (89%), and appropriate (95%; proportion with average ratings ≥ 4 out of 5 on AIM, FIM, and IAM respectively). They rated 6 of the 7 modules as helpful, appropriate, and fitting with their experience (77%-100% with Likert ratings ≥ 4 out of 5); the below-threshold module (Introduction) was revised based on rapid qualitative analysis of interview data. Although 33% needed help to start using the website, its usability was rated highly after use (PSSUQ Mdn = 1.56, IQR = 1.11-1.82). The refined intervention is a largely self-guided program to enhance stress management skills using psychoeducation, recorded on-demand exercises, and 3 brief coaching calls.

Conclusions: This highly-rated intervention has the potential to alleviate scanxiety among people with advanced lung cancer.

Background: Receiving a child's cancer diagnosis is a highly traumatic experience for parents, often leading to significant psychological distress, including symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The way healthcare professionals deliver this news can affect the severity of parents' reactions. While some research examines communication style's impact on patients, few studies focus on its effects on parents.

Aims: This study explores the relationship between the communication style used by oncologists when delivering a child's cancer diagnosis and the subsequent levels of PTSD symptoms, mental resilience, and self-efficacy in parents.

Methods: One hundred twenty eight parents of children diagnosed with cancer participated. Data were collected using the Styles of Communicating Questionnaire (SCQ), PTSD Checklist for DSM-V (PCL-5), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISK), and the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Correlations and hierarchical multiple regressions were performed to examine the relationship between communication style and psychological outcomes.

Results: Parents who perceived the oncologist's communication style as more activating (clear, structured, and action-oriented) reported significantly lower levels of PTSD symptoms and higher levels of resilience and self-efficacy. The perception of empathy played a crucial role, particularly when physicians balanced emotional and cognitive empathy. This balance was linked to better psychological outcomes in parents.

Conclusions: The study highlights the critical role of communication style in mitigating the psychological impact of a child's cancer diagnosis on parents. Training healthcare providers to balance cognitive and emotional empathy in communication may reduce PTSD symptoms and enhance resilience and self-efficacy in parents, ultimately improving their psychological well-being during such a challenging time.

Objective: The psychological and social challenges of an adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer diagnosis often transcend physical health, impacting one's social network during a time when peer connections may be most crucial for support. The current study examines adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors' perspectives on how cancer impacts their thoughts and behaviors toward forming new peer relationships.

Methods: Thirty-five YA survivors (Mean age = 33 ± 5.67 years) diagnosed with cancer between 18 and 39 years participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Interviews were coded and analyzed to identify major themes.

Results: When pursuing friendships with non-cancer peers, survivors mentioned discomfort in disclosing, connection through mutual hardship, and revised outlooks on friendship. While befriending new non-cancer peers offered opportunities to be surrounded by positive people, seeking out these friendships was complicated by a desire to find people who understood hardship and could respond well to their cancer status. When forming relationships with cancer peers, AYAs emphasized the shared cancer experience, wariness of negative exposures, and consideration of similarity in cancer factors. They sought shared understanding and validation from cancer peers but were also cautious about exposure to reminders of illness and mindful that certain dissimilarities could hinder the establishment of meaningful connections.

Conclusions: Findings provide insight into the complex ways that cancer shapes AYA survivors' approach to forming friendships post-diagnosis, presenting guidance on tailored support interventions and resources that can aid in fostering healthy peer relationships and enhance well-being among AYA survivors.

Objective: Malignant brain tumors are associated with debilitating symptoms and a poor prognosis, resulting in high psychological distress for patients and caregivers. There is a lack of longitudinal studies investigating psychological distress in this group. This study evaluated fear of progression (FoP), anxiety and depression in patients and their caregivers in the 6 months following malignant brain tumor diagnosis.

Methods: This prospective, observational study assessed FoP (FoP-Q-SF[P]), anxiety and depression (HADS) at diagnosis (T0) and after three (T1) and 6 months (T2) in patients with malignant brain tumors (primary, secondary) and their caregivers. Multilevel analyses were used to examine changes over time and differences between patients and caregivers, while accounting for the interdependence in their distress values.

Results: Seventy-one patients and 68 caregivers were included in the analysis. Throughout the study period, over 50% reported clinically relevant FoP, almost 50% reported clinically relevant anxiety, and over 30% reported relevant depression. Over all time points, caregivers reported significantly higher anxiety and depression than patients. Anxiety decreased between T0 and T2 in both groups. Exploratory analyses showed that female sex was associated with higher anxiety, and older age with higher depression. No significant predictors were identified for FoP.

Conclusion: A substantial number of patients and caregivers experience clinically relevant psychological distress in the 6 months following a malignant brain tumor diagnosis. Caregivers are particularly distressed, reporting higher anxiety and depression. Integrating psycho-oncological assessments and interventions for both patients and caregivers into clinical care is critical to address the psychological distress associated with malignant brain tumors.

Objectives: Individuals living with advanced cancer commonly experience death anxiety, which refers to the distressing thoughts or feelings associated with awareness of one's mortality. Deriving an overview of existing literature on the psychological and social factors linked to death anxiety may inform conceptual models, clinical screening, and intervention strategies in oncology and palliative care. Therefore, the present scoping review was conducted to summarize the current literature on the psychosocial correlates of death anxiety among individuals with advanced cancer.

Methods: A comprehensive scoping review methodology was used following the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A literature search was conducted using four electronic databases: CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE. Abstracts and full-text articles were screened, and relevant data were extracted and summarized.

Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen psychosocial correlates of death anxiety were identified, with depression, spiritual well-being, and attachment security representing the most frequently investigated. Four previously tested death anxiety models were also identified, two of which were designed longitudinally.

Conclusions: This review provides a current summary of psychosocial factors and established models related to death anxiety in advanced cancer. Multiple psychosocial correlates should be targeted concurrently in research and clinical practice to address death anxiety. Longitudinal studies designed to test new models are especially needed to identify unique pathways contributing to death anxiety across the disease trajectory of advanced cancer.

Background: Black women generally report high levels of spirituality. Less is known about Black women's spiritual coping with a cancer diagnosis. Persisting health disparities between Black breast cancer survivors and other racial groups necessitate examining whether spirituality can be a contextual and personal resource for Black women with breast cancer.

Aims: This qualitative study's goals were to: (1) characterize positive and negative dimensions of spirituality in a sample of Black women diagnosed with breast cancer; and (2) examine whether and how women used spirituality during their cancer experience.

Methods: Three Gatherings (i.e., culturally curated focus groups) were conducted as part of Project SOAR (Speaking Our African American Realities), a community-academic partnership. In these all-Black women Gatherings, participants (N = 37) discussed their breast cancer experience, including how spirituality played a role.

Results: Through reflexive thematic analysis, six themes were identified: (1) faith is central to my identity even through challenging times; (2) meaningful, ineffective, or non-existent support from my spiritual community; (3) grappling with spiritual discontent during breast cancer; (4) God is omnipotent; (5) spiritual anchors helped me persevere through the breast cancer journey; (6) breast cancer reflections enhanced my spiritual gratitude and growth.

Conclusions: Participants' experiences highlight the complexities of spirituality when confronting breast cancer. Many Black women reflected on the centrality of spirituality to their lives and cited spirituality as a resource and effective coping process during their cancer experience. Findings have important implications for understanding how spirituality can be incorporated to support Black women with breast cancer.