Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Different Doses Schedules of Thalidomide for Treating Moderate-to-Severe β-Thalassemia Patients.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S481128
Wei-Jia Yang, Lian-Dong Shi, Ye Liang, Li-Ming Liang, Hao Zhang, Li Wang, Qian Zhou
{"title":"Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Different Doses Schedules of Thalidomide for Treating Moderate-to-Severe β-Thalassemia Patients.","authors":"Wei-Jia Yang, Lian-Dong Shi, Ye Liang, Li-Ming Liang, Hao Zhang, Li Wang, Qian Zhou","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S481128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of thalidomide by clinically observing 48 individuals with β-thalassemia who have been administered thalidomide in small and medium doses over a period of two years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thalidomide's efficacy was gauged by tracking hemoglobin (Hb) level alterations post its administration. Liver and kidney function impact was measured through tests for alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine. Hemolysis effects were assessed via total bilirubin and indirect bilirubin level measurements. Thrombosis detection was performed using ultrasound examinations of deep vein vessels in the upper and lower extremities. Any adverse effects of thalidomide were recorded during the observation period. Lower dose thalidomide effectiveness was evaluated by monitoring Hb level changes following dosage reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate (ORR) among the 48 participants was 91.7% (44 out of 48), with the main reaction (MaR) reaching 72.9% (35 out of 48). Hepatorenal toxicity was not monitored during the 2-year observation period, and there was no improvement in hemolysis. Most adverse effects were mild, with no instances of venous thrombosis and no cases of grade 2 or higher neurotoxicity. When the observation group was divided into three age categories (12-14 years old, 14-18 years old, and over 18 years old), there were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of adverse reactions among the three groups. As there were some adverse reactions in ten cases, the treatment dose was reduced for them. The maintenance efficacy rate at one year of observation was 90% (9 out of 10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that thalidomide in small doses over a 2-year observation period is effective, and has no instances of grade 2 or higher neurotoxicity. Long-term maintenance with small doses is recommended for enhanced safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"20 ","pages":"799-809"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S481128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of thalidomide by clinically observing 48 individuals with β-thalassemia who have been administered thalidomide in small and medium doses over a period of two years.

Methods: Thalidomide's efficacy was gauged by tracking hemoglobin (Hb) level alterations post its administration. Liver and kidney function impact was measured through tests for alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine. Hemolysis effects were assessed via total bilirubin and indirect bilirubin level measurements. Thrombosis detection was performed using ultrasound examinations of deep vein vessels in the upper and lower extremities. Any adverse effects of thalidomide were recorded during the observation period. Lower dose thalidomide effectiveness was evaluated by monitoring Hb level changes following dosage reduction.

Results: The overall response rate (ORR) among the 48 participants was 91.7% (44 out of 48), with the main reaction (MaR) reaching 72.9% (35 out of 48). Hepatorenal toxicity was not monitored during the 2-year observation period, and there was no improvement in hemolysis. Most adverse effects were mild, with no instances of venous thrombosis and no cases of grade 2 or higher neurotoxicity. When the observation group was divided into three age categories (12-14 years old, 14-18 years old, and over 18 years old), there were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of adverse reactions among the three groups. As there were some adverse reactions in ten cases, the treatment dose was reduced for them. The maintenance efficacy rate at one year of observation was 90% (9 out of 10).

Conclusion: This study confirmed that thalidomide in small doses over a 2-year observation period is effective, and has no instances of grade 2 or higher neurotoxicity. Long-term maintenance with small doses is recommended for enhanced safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同剂量方案沙利度胺治疗中重度β-地中海贫血患者的疗效和安全性比较
目的:在这项研究中,我们通过临床观察48例β-地中海贫血患者,他们在两年的时间里服用了小剂量和中剂量的沙利度胺,来评估沙利度胺的有效性和安全性。方法:通过监测沙利度胺给药后血红蛋白(Hb)水平变化来评价沙利度胺的疗效。通过检测丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶、血尿素氮和肌酐来测量肝肾功能的影响。通过总胆红素和间接胆红素水平测量来评估溶血效果。采用超声检查上、下肢深静脉血管,检测血栓形成。观察期间记录沙利度胺的不良反应。通过监测减少剂量后Hb水平的变化来评估低剂量沙利度胺的有效性。结果:48例患者的总有效率(ORR)为91.7%(44 / 48),主要反应(MaR)为72.9%(35 / 48)。2年观察期间未监测肝肾毒性,溶血情况无改善。大多数不良反应是轻微的,没有静脉血栓形成的情况下,没有2级或更高的神经毒性的情况下。将观察组分为12-14岁、14-18岁、18岁以上三个年龄段,三组不良反应发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义。其中10例出现不良反应,减量治疗。观察1年时维持有效率为90%(9 / 10)。结论:本研究证实,在2年的观察期内,小剂量的沙利度胺是有效的,没有2级或更高级别的神经毒性。建议小剂量长期维持以提高安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
The Development of Publications on Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Bibliometric Analysis. Factors Associated With Recurrent Emergency Department Visits for Epistaxis in Adults, Cross Sectional Study in Two Tertiary Care Hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [Letter]. Mesalazine-Induced Acute Pancreatitis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Systematic Review. Obstacles to Early Diagnosis of Gaucher Disease. Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full Immobilization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1