False Confessions: An Integrative Review of the Phenomenon.

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Behavioral Sciences & the Law Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1002/bsl.2707
Michael Welner, Matt DeLisi, Theresa Janusewski
{"title":"False Confessions: An Integrative Review of the Phenomenon.","authors":"Michael Welner, Matt DeLisi, Theresa Janusewski","doi":"10.1002/bsl.2707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Confessions are an important evidentiary part of the legal process, and false confessions have been notable contributors to wrongful convictions. However, academic research in the psychology and law field primarily relies on student or volunteer samples in staged exercises, methodological features that lack ecological validity for replicating police interrogation or the pressures distinctive to high stakes crime investigations. Here, we provide an integrative review of research and data on false confessions during police interrogations with distinctions of key concepts, relevant case law pertaining to confessions including several U.S. Supreme Court decisions, updating the typology of false confessions, the quantification of false confessions, risk factors for false confessions, interrogation risk factors for false confessions, validity threats to false confessions research, and recommended directions for informing courts and the law.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Confessions are an important evidentiary part of the legal process, and false confessions have been notable contributors to wrongful convictions. However, academic research in the psychology and law field primarily relies on student or volunteer samples in staged exercises, methodological features that lack ecological validity for replicating police interrogation or the pressures distinctive to high stakes crime investigations. Here, we provide an integrative review of research and data on false confessions during police interrogations with distinctions of key concepts, relevant case law pertaining to confessions including several U.S. Supreme Court decisions, updating the typology of false confessions, the quantification of false confessions, risk factors for false confessions, interrogation risk factors for false confessions, validity threats to false confessions research, and recommended directions for informing courts and the law.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚假供述:对该现象的综合评价。
供词是法律程序中重要的证据部分,而虚假供词是导致错判的显著因素。然而,心理学和法律领域的学术研究主要依赖于学生或志愿者的实验样本,缺乏复制警察审讯或高风险犯罪调查特有的压力的生态有效性的方法特征。在这里,我们提供了一个综合审查的研究和数据在警察审讯中的虚假供词的关键概念的区别,相关的案例法与供词,包括几个美国最高法院的判决,更新虚假供词的类型,虚假供词的量化,虚假供词的风险因素,虚假供词的审讯风险因素,虚假供词的有效性威胁研究,并推荐了通知法院和法律的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence and Identification of the Deceased: a Narrative Review With Implications in Forensic Science. Relative Impact of Underreporting and Desistance on the Dark Figure of Sexual Recidivism. Rituals of Harm: Castration and Genealogies of Sacred Wound Cultures in the Hijra Communities of India. Transgender History, Part I: An Anthropology of Gender-Nonconformity Across Ages and Cultures. Pareto in Prison.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1