Transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the bilateral IFG alters cognitive processes during creative ideation.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH npj Science of Learning Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1038/s41539-024-00285-z
Cong Xie, Shuangfei Zhang, Xinuo Qiao, Ning Hao
{"title":"Transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the bilateral IFG alters cognitive processes during creative ideation.","authors":"Cong Xie, Shuangfei Zhang, Xinuo Qiao, Ning Hao","doi":"10.1038/s41539-024-00285-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) can alter the thinking process and neural basis of creativity. Participants' performance on the compound remote associates (CRA) task was analyzed considering the semantic features of each trial after receiving different tDCS protocols (left cathodal and right anodal, L + R-; right cathodal and left anodal, L-R+; and Sham). Moreover, we constructed and compared 80 prediction models of CRA performance for each group based on task-related functional connectivity. Results showed that L + R- stimulation improved performance in semantically bundled CRA trials, while L-R+ stimulation enhanced performance in trials with greater semantic distance. Furthermore, alpha-band task connectivity models for the L + R- group showed inferior performance and greater left frontal lateralization than other two groups. These findings suggest that tDCS targeting the bilateral IFG alters cognitive processes during creative ideation rather than enhancing or impairing an established thinking process.</p>","PeriodicalId":48503,"journal":{"name":"npj Science of Learning","volume":"9 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Science of Learning","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00285-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) can alter the thinking process and neural basis of creativity. Participants' performance on the compound remote associates (CRA) task was analyzed considering the semantic features of each trial after receiving different tDCS protocols (left cathodal and right anodal, L + R-; right cathodal and left anodal, L-R+; and Sham). Moreover, we constructed and compared 80 prediction models of CRA performance for each group based on task-related functional connectivity. Results showed that L + R- stimulation improved performance in semantically bundled CRA trials, while L-R+ stimulation enhanced performance in trials with greater semantic distance. Furthermore, alpha-band task connectivity models for the L + R- group showed inferior performance and greater left frontal lateralization than other two groups. These findings suggest that tDCS targeting the bilateral IFG alters cognitive processes during creative ideation rather than enhancing or impairing an established thinking process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对双侧IFG的经颅直流电刺激改变了创造性思维中的认知过程。
本研究探讨了针对额下回(IFG)的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是否能改变思维过程和创造力的神经基础。考虑不同tDCS方案(左阴极和右阳极,L + R-;右阴极和左阳极,L-R+;和虚假的)。此外,我们构建并比较了80个基于任务相关功能连通性的预测模型。结果表明,L + R-刺激可提高语义捆绑的CRA试验的表现,而L-R+刺激可提高语义距离较大的CRA试验的表现。此外,与其他两组相比,L + R-组的α波段任务连接模型表现出更差的表现和更大的左额叶偏侧。这些发现表明,针对双侧IFG的tDCS改变了创造性思维过程中的认知过程,而不是增强或损害既定的思维过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Non-linear development in statistical learning of visual orthographic regularities. COVID-19, school closures, and student learning outcomes. New global evidence from PISA. Effects of described demonstrator ability on brain and behavior when learning from others. Faster implicit motor sequence learning of new sequences compatible in terms of movement transitions. Publisher Correction: The representational instability in the generalization of fear learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1