Effects of high-protein supplementation during cancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.08.016
Camila E Orsso, Anne Caretero, Taiara Scopel Poltronieri, Jann Arends, Marian Ae de van der Schueren, Nicole Kiss, Alessandro Laviano, Carla M Prado
{"title":"Effects of high-protein supplementation during cancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Camila E Orsso, Anne Caretero, Taiara Scopel Poltronieri, Jann Arends, Marian Ae de van der Schueren, Nicole Kiss, Alessandro Laviano, Carla M Prado","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Establishing the effectiveness of high-protein supplementation in reducing cancer-related side effects is crucial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of high-protein supplementation on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cancer therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted on Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus from inception until July 2023. Randomized controlled trials administering supplements with ≥10 g protein/serving, given to 20+ adult patients undergoing cancer therapy were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the effects of high-protein supplementation on the primary outcomes of body weight and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We employed a vote-counting approach based on effect direction for secondary outcomes (that is, body composition, muscle function, hospitalization, response to cancer therapy/toxicity, survival, and systemic inflammation). Risk-of-bias (ROB) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five studies involving 3701 patients with diverse cancer types were included. Patients who received high-protein supplementation lost less body weight than controls (mean difference = 1.45 kg; 95% CI: 0.42, 2.48 kg; P = 0.006; I<sup>2</sup> = 80%). No differences in HRQoL were observed; all studies assessing HRQoL were rated as high ROB. A beneficial effect on muscle mass was found in 11 of 13 studies, although most had a high ROB due to assessment techniques. When considering higher quality studies, evidence of a beneficial effect was found in 5 of 5 studies for muscle strength, and 3 of 4 for hospitalization rate. Effects on other secondary outcomes were inconsistent or limited. No serious adverse effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-protein supplementation mitigates weight loss, improves muscle strength, and lowers hospitalization rates in patients undergoing cancer therapy. These positive clinical outcomes, along with a favorable safety profile, suggest that high-protein supplementation may be a valuable addition to medical practice. However, given the need for more robust trials and the high ROB observed in the existing studies, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution. This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42021237372.</p>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"120 6","pages":"1311-1324"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.08.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Establishing the effectiveness of high-protein supplementation in reducing cancer-related side effects is crucial.

Objective: The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of high-protein supplementation on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cancer therapy.

Methods: Systematic searches were conducted on Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus from inception until July 2023. Randomized controlled trials administering supplements with ≥10 g protein/serving, given to 20+ adult patients undergoing cancer therapy were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the effects of high-protein supplementation on the primary outcomes of body weight and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We employed a vote-counting approach based on effect direction for secondary outcomes (that is, body composition, muscle function, hospitalization, response to cancer therapy/toxicity, survival, and systemic inflammation). Risk-of-bias (ROB) was assessed.

Results: Thirty-five studies involving 3701 patients with diverse cancer types were included. Patients who received high-protein supplementation lost less body weight than controls (mean difference = 1.45 kg; 95% CI: 0.42, 2.48 kg; P = 0.006; I2 = 80%). No differences in HRQoL were observed; all studies assessing HRQoL were rated as high ROB. A beneficial effect on muscle mass was found in 11 of 13 studies, although most had a high ROB due to assessment techniques. When considering higher quality studies, evidence of a beneficial effect was found in 5 of 5 studies for muscle strength, and 3 of 4 for hospitalization rate. Effects on other secondary outcomes were inconsistent or limited. No serious adverse effects were reported.

Conclusions: High-protein supplementation mitigates weight loss, improves muscle strength, and lowers hospitalization rates in patients undergoing cancer therapy. These positive clinical outcomes, along with a favorable safety profile, suggest that high-protein supplementation may be a valuable addition to medical practice. However, given the need for more robust trials and the high ROB observed in the existing studies, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution. This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42021237372.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高蛋白补充对癌症治疗的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:确定高蛋白补充剂在减少癌症相关副作用方面的有效性至关重要。目的:本研究旨在评估高蛋白补充对癌症治疗患者临床结局的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索Medline、护理与相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和Scopus,检索时间自成立至2023年7月。随机对照试验纳入了20+接受癌症治疗的成年患者,给予≥10g蛋白质/份的补充剂。随机效应荟萃分析用于估计高蛋白补充剂对体重和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的主要结局的影响。我们采用了基于次要结果(即身体成分、肌肉功能、住院、对癌症治疗/毒性反应、生存和全身炎症)影响方向的计票方法。评估偏倚风险(ROB)。结果:纳入35项研究,涉及3701例不同癌症类型的患者。接受高蛋白补充剂的患者体重减轻少于对照组(平均差= 1.45 kg;95% CI: 0.42, 2.48 kg;P = 0.006;I2 = 80%)。两组HRQoL无差异;所有评估HRQoL的研究均被评为高ROB。13项研究中有11项发现了对肌肉质量的有益影响,尽管由于评估技术的原因,大多数研究都有较高的ROB。在考虑更高质量的研究时,5项关于肌肉力量的研究中有5项,4项关于住院率的研究中有3项发现了有益效果的证据。对其他次要结局的影响不一致或有限。没有严重的不良反应报告。结论:在接受癌症治疗的患者中,补充高蛋白可以减轻体重减轻,提高肌肉力量,降低住院率。这些积极的临床结果以及良好的安全性表明,高蛋白补充剂可能是医疗实践中有价值的补充。然而,考虑到需要更有力的试验和现有研究中观察到的高ROB,这些结论应该谨慎解释。本综述在PROSPERO前瞻性注册,注册号为CRD42021237372。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of (poly)phenols following consumption of selected blueberries and a blueberry-rich protein bar by adult males and females: a randomized, crossover, controlled trial. Unveiling Sub-group Trends of Stunting and Wasting in Indian Children: A Serial Cross-sectional Analysis from National Family Health Surveys 3-5. Consuming Pecans as a Snack Improves Lipids/Lipoproteins and Diet Quality Compared to Usual Diet in Adults at Increased Risk for Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Protein glycation compromises the bioavailability of milk protein-derived lysine in vivo in healthy adult males: a double-blind randomized cross-over trial. Describing the landscape of nutrition- and diet-related randomized controlled trials: meta-research study of protocols published between 2012 and 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1