Safety and effectiveness of consecutive 191 endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage procedures: a single-center experience.

Michał Zieliński, Mateusz Jagielski, Jacek Piątkowski, Marek Jackowski
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of consecutive 191 endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage procedures: a single-center experience.","authors":"Michał Zieliński, Mateusz Jagielski, Jacek Piątkowski, Marek Jackowski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0054.5126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; The development of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has enabled extra-anatomical transmural access to the bile ducts, thus making it possible to perform endoscopic biliary anastomoses with the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and obtain extra-anatomical transpapillary access. EUS provides an alternative to the existing methods of biliary drainage (BD) for cases in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is ineffective.&lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extraanatomical endoscopic biliary access methods for the treatment of benign and malignant biliary strictures.&lt;b&gt;Material and methods:&lt;/b&gt; This retrospective analysis included treatment results of all patients with obstructive jaundice and biliary strictures who were treated endoscopically in our department between 2016 and 2023. The study group comprised patients in whom EUS-guided transmural access was used during ERCP because of biliary strictures and the lack of transpapillary access.&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Twenty-eight patients (14.66%) underwent endoscopic transpapillary biliary stenting via a transmural approach under EUS guidance. The remaining 163 patients (85.34%) underwent extraanatomical transmural biliodigestive anastomosis. Technical success was achieved in 186 of 191 (97.38%) patients. Clinical success was achieved in 170 of 191 (89.01%) patients. Complications were reported for 32 of 191 (16.75%) patients, including fatal complications for 6 of 191 (3.14%) patients.&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Advanced endoscopic techniques involving EUS-guided transmural access are effective and safe for biliary strictures. They provide an alternative to other drainage techniques when ERCP is ineffective and improve the quality of life of patients undergoing palliative treatment for biliary strictures with unresectable cancer of the biliopancreatic area.</p>","PeriodicalId":501107,"journal":{"name":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","volume":"96 6","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.5126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> The development of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has enabled extra-anatomical transmural access to the bile ducts, thus making it possible to perform endoscopic biliary anastomoses with the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and obtain extra-anatomical transpapillary access. EUS provides an alternative to the existing methods of biliary drainage (BD) for cases in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is ineffective.<b>Aim:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extraanatomical endoscopic biliary access methods for the treatment of benign and malignant biliary strictures.<b>Material and methods:</b> This retrospective analysis included treatment results of all patients with obstructive jaundice and biliary strictures who were treated endoscopically in our department between 2016 and 2023. The study group comprised patients in whom EUS-guided transmural access was used during ERCP because of biliary strictures and the lack of transpapillary access.<b>Results:</b> Twenty-eight patients (14.66%) underwent endoscopic transpapillary biliary stenting via a transmural approach under EUS guidance. The remaining 163 patients (85.34%) underwent extraanatomical transmural biliodigestive anastomosis. Technical success was achieved in 186 of 191 (97.38%) patients. Clinical success was achieved in 170 of 191 (89.01%) patients. Complications were reported for 32 of 191 (16.75%) patients, including fatal complications for 6 of 191 (3.14%) patients.<b>Conclusions:</b> Advanced endoscopic techniques involving EUS-guided transmural access are effective and safe for biliary strictures. They provide an alternative to other drainage techniques when ERCP is ineffective and improve the quality of life of patients undergoing palliative treatment for biliary strictures with unresectable cancer of the biliopancreatic area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连续191例超声内镜引导胆道引流术的安全性和有效性:单中心经验。
& lt; b>介绍:& lt; / b>超声内镜(EUS)的发展使经解剖外的胆管经壁通路成为可能,从而使胆管经内镜与胃肠道吻合,获得经解剖外的经毛细血管通路成为可能。对于内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)无效的病例,EUS提供了一种替代现有胆道引流(BD)方法的方法。本研究旨在评价经解剖外胆道内镜入路治疗胆道良恶性狭窄的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:<;/ & >;回顾性分析2016年至2023年在我科内镜下治疗的梗阻性黄疸合并胆道狭窄患者的治疗结果。研究组包括由于胆道狭窄和缺乏经毛细血管通路而在ERCP中使用eus引导下的经壁通路的患者。28例(14.66%)患者在EUS指导下经经壁入路行内镜下经毛细血管胆道支架植入术。其余163例(85.34%)行解剖外经壁胆消化吻合术。191例患者中186例(97.38%)技术成功。191例患者中有170例(89.01%)获得临床成功。191例患者中出现并发症32例(16.75%),其中致死性并发症6例(3.14%)。先进的内镜技术包括eus引导下的跨壁通道,对胆道狭窄是有效和安全的。当ERCP无效时,它们为其他引流技术提供了另一种选择,并改善了胆道狭窄伴不可切除胆管胰区癌症患者接受姑息治疗的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of anal fissures using the new TRPM8 receptor therapy - own experience. Static reanimation of the paralyzed face using non-absorbable polypropylene mesh. Mesenteric cysts. Delayed diagnosis, disease and secondary prevention, especially in young patients with colorectal cancer. Perioperative Elective Management in Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants - Practical Guide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1