Does prophylactic tamsulosin use with ERAS protocol provide improvement after colorectal surgery?

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116127
Kamil Erozkan, Mikhael Belkovsky, Michael Klingler, Lukas Schabl, Attila Ulkucu, Arielle Kanters, Scott R Steele, Emre Gorgun
{"title":"Does prophylactic tamsulosin use with ERAS protocol provide improvement after colorectal surgery?","authors":"Kamil Erozkan, Mikhael Belkovsky, Michael Klingler, Lukas Schabl, Attila Ulkucu, Arielle Kanters, Scott R Steele, Emre Gorgun","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early urinary catheter removal has been incorporated into Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways to aid faster recovery and minimize urinary tract infection. However, early catheter removal can result in urinary retention, which may lead to catheter reinsertion and a prolonged hospital stay. Tamsulosin, an alpha-blocking medication, effectively treats urinary retention in both men and women. Our study aims to compare urinary retention rates and short-term outcomes between patients treated with tamsulosin and those who were not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent elective abdominopelvic colorectal procedures using the ERAS protocol between September 2020 and October 2023. After April 2022, postoperative 0.4 ​mg tamsulosin treatment was added to the ERAS protocol. Univariate analysis was used to compare demographics and perioperative treatment history. The control and tamsulosin groups were matched in a 2:1 ratio, using propensity scores. The primary outcomes were urinary retention and the length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 2072 patients (1215 female, 58.6 ​%), with a mean age of 53.1 (±17.1) years. The initial univariate analysis was followed by propensity score matching, resulting in 344 patients in the tamsulosin group and 688 in the control group. The urinary retention rate was notably lower in patients who received tamsulosin during hospitalization (9.2 ​% vs. 4.7 ​%, p ​= ​0.01). Furthermore, the length of hospital stay was shorter in patients treated with tamsulosin (5 vs. 4.2 p ​< ​0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative prophylactic tamsulosin use decreases urinary retention rates and length of stay after colorectal surgery and should be considered complementary to ERAS protocols for improved recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"241 ","pages":"116127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early urinary catheter removal has been incorporated into Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways to aid faster recovery and minimize urinary tract infection. However, early catheter removal can result in urinary retention, which may lead to catheter reinsertion and a prolonged hospital stay. Tamsulosin, an alpha-blocking medication, effectively treats urinary retention in both men and women. Our study aims to compare urinary retention rates and short-term outcomes between patients treated with tamsulosin and those who were not.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent elective abdominopelvic colorectal procedures using the ERAS protocol between September 2020 and October 2023. After April 2022, postoperative 0.4 ​mg tamsulosin treatment was added to the ERAS protocol. Univariate analysis was used to compare demographics and perioperative treatment history. The control and tamsulosin groups were matched in a 2:1 ratio, using propensity scores. The primary outcomes were urinary retention and the length of hospital stay.

Results: The study included 2072 patients (1215 female, 58.6 ​%), with a mean age of 53.1 (±17.1) years. The initial univariate analysis was followed by propensity score matching, resulting in 344 patients in the tamsulosin group and 688 in the control group. The urinary retention rate was notably lower in patients who received tamsulosin during hospitalization (9.2 ​% vs. 4.7 ​%, p ​= ​0.01). Furthermore, the length of hospital stay was shorter in patients treated with tamsulosin (5 vs. 4.2 p ​< ​0.01).

Conclusion: Postoperative prophylactic tamsulosin use decreases urinary retention rates and length of stay after colorectal surgery and should be considered complementary to ERAS protocols for improved recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Clinical impacts of utilizing ceftriaxone and metronidazole versus piperacillin/tazobactam in patients diagnosed with complicated diverticulitis. Association of non-English as primary language on clinical outcomes for arteriovenous fistula creation within a safety net system. Mediation analysis identifies causal factors that lead to increased rates of kidney transplant failure in patients with peripheral vascular disease. The canaries in the coal mine: Medical and surgical trainees. Read one, write one, dictate one.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1