Association of non-English as primary language on clinical outcomes for arteriovenous fistula creation within a safety net system

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116192
Isabela Sandigo-Saballos , Micaela Torres , Mark Archie , Maria Valadez , Anibal La Riva , Laura Perez , Ashkan Moazzez , Sarah Weber , Sara Rashidi , Christian de Virgilio
{"title":"Association of non-English as primary language on clinical outcomes for arteriovenous fistula creation within a safety net system","authors":"Isabela Sandigo-Saballos ,&nbsp;Micaela Torres ,&nbsp;Mark Archie ,&nbsp;Maria Valadez ,&nbsp;Anibal La Riva ,&nbsp;Laura Perez ,&nbsp;Ashkan Moazzez ,&nbsp;Sarah Weber ,&nbsp;Sara Rashidi ,&nbsp;Christian de Virgilio","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Approximately 22 ​% of the United States population communicates in a non-English language, potentially impacting healthcare communication and outcomes. Few studies have examined the association between non-English primary language (NEPL) and surgical outcomes and none to our knowledge in patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula creation within a safety net system. In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis on adults who underwent AVF creation for hemodialysis access between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019. We employed a bivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between primary language and 30-day ED visits and readmissions, both for all-cause after AVF surgery and those specifically related to arteriovenous fistula (AVF) complications and a multivariate logistic regression to adjust for any cofounders. Among the study population of 1502 patients, 70 ​% were NEPL and predominantly self-identified as Hispanic/Latino. Despite the older age and higher prevalence of diabetes among NEPL patients, there was no statistically significant association of NEPL with 30-day readmission or ED visits post-AVF creation. The availability of certified translators and diverse array of healthcare professionals may have contributed to these findings. Nonetheless, further investigation is warranted to elucidate the impact of language discordance on post-surgical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 116192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025000145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 22 ​% of the United States population communicates in a non-English language, potentially impacting healthcare communication and outcomes. Few studies have examined the association between non-English primary language (NEPL) and surgical outcomes and none to our knowledge in patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula creation within a safety net system. In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis on adults who underwent AVF creation for hemodialysis access between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019. We employed a bivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between primary language and 30-day ED visits and readmissions, both for all-cause after AVF surgery and those specifically related to arteriovenous fistula (AVF) complications and a multivariate logistic regression to adjust for any cofounders. Among the study population of 1502 patients, 70 ​% were NEPL and predominantly self-identified as Hispanic/Latino. Despite the older age and higher prevalence of diabetes among NEPL patients, there was no statistically significant association of NEPL with 30-day readmission or ED visits post-AVF creation. The availability of certified translators and diverse array of healthcare professionals may have contributed to these findings. Nonetheless, further investigation is warranted to elucidate the impact of language discordance on post-surgical outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非英语作为主要语言与安全网系统中动静脉瘘形成的临床结果的关联。
大约22%的美国人使用非英语进行交流,这可能会影响医疗保健沟通和结果。很少有研究调查非英语母语(NEPL)与手术结果之间的关系,据我们所知,在安全网系统内进行动静脉瘘创建的患者中没有研究。在这项研究中,我们对2014年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间为血液透析接受AVF创建的成年人进行了回顾性分析。我们采用双变量逻辑回归分析来评估主要语言与30天急诊科就诊和再入院之间的关系,包括AVF手术后的全因和与动静脉瘘(AVF)并发症特别相关的患者,并采用多变量逻辑回归来调整任何共同因素。在1502例患者的研究人群中,70%为NEPL,主要自认为是西班牙裔/拉丁裔。尽管NEPL患者年龄较大,糖尿病患病率较高,但NEPL与avf创建后30天再入院或ED就诊没有统计学意义上的显著关联。获得认证的翻译人员和各种各样的医疗保健专业人员可能有助于这些发现。尽管如此,需要进一步的研究来阐明语言失调对术后预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Sustainability within Surgery: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives The 2024 North Pacific Surgical Association Historian's Lecture. Redefining academic surgery and recognizing the value of community practice. Statement from the Society of Black Academic Surgeons (SBAS) affirming our commitment to excellence for all. Strong laws aren't enough: Historic redlining, state firearm laws, and urban firearm violence in the United States. Sharper minds, safer surgeries: Understanding the importance of cognitive ergonomics - A perspective piece from the society of surgical ergonomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1