Karen Ofuji Osiro, Harry Morales Duque, Kamila Botelho Sampaio de Oliveira, Nadielle Tamires Moreira Melo, Letícia Ferreira Lima, Hugo Costa Paes, Octavio Luiz Franco
{"title":"Cleaving the way for heterologous peptide production: An overview of cleavage strategies.","authors":"Karen Ofuji Osiro, Harry Morales Duque, Kamila Botelho Sampaio de Oliveira, Nadielle Tamires Moreira Melo, Letícia Ferreira Lima, Hugo Costa Paes, Octavio Luiz Franco","doi":"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the main bottlenecks for recombinant peptide production is choosing the proper cleavage method to remove fusion protein tags from target peptides. While these tags are crucial for inhibiting the activity of the target peptide during heterologous expression, incorporating a cleavage site is essential for their later removal, ensuring the pure sequencing of the peptide. This review evaluates different cleavage methods, including protease-mediated, self-cleavable protein, and chemical-mediated sites, regarding their advantages and limitations. For instance, intein, N<sup>pro</sup> EDDIE, enterokinase, factor Xa, SUMO, and CNBr are options for residue-free cleavage. Although protease-mediated cleavage is widely used, it can be expensive, due to its own cost added to the whole process. As an alternative, self-cleavable sites eliminate the requirement for proteinases. Another crucial step in defining the proper cleavage method is cost consideration, which relates to the purpose of peptide production. Here, we explore a range of cleavage approaches, meeting the needs of both cost-constrained applications and a more flexible budget. Overall, selecting the most suitable cleavage method should be based on careful consideration of toxicity, cost, accuracy, and specific application requirements to ensure a state-of-the-art approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":390,"journal":{"name":"Methods","volume":" ","pages":"36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.12.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One of the main bottlenecks for recombinant peptide production is choosing the proper cleavage method to remove fusion protein tags from target peptides. While these tags are crucial for inhibiting the activity of the target peptide during heterologous expression, incorporating a cleavage site is essential for their later removal, ensuring the pure sequencing of the peptide. This review evaluates different cleavage methods, including protease-mediated, self-cleavable protein, and chemical-mediated sites, regarding their advantages and limitations. For instance, intein, Npro EDDIE, enterokinase, factor Xa, SUMO, and CNBr are options for residue-free cleavage. Although protease-mediated cleavage is widely used, it can be expensive, due to its own cost added to the whole process. As an alternative, self-cleavable sites eliminate the requirement for proteinases. Another crucial step in defining the proper cleavage method is cost consideration, which relates to the purpose of peptide production. Here, we explore a range of cleavage approaches, meeting the needs of both cost-constrained applications and a more flexible budget. Overall, selecting the most suitable cleavage method should be based on careful consideration of toxicity, cost, accuracy, and specific application requirements to ensure a state-of-the-art approach.
期刊介绍:
Methods focuses on rapidly developing techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences.
Each topical issue, organized by a guest editor who is an expert in the area covered, consists solely of invited quality articles by specialist authors, many of them reviews. Issues are devoted to specific technical approaches with emphasis on clear detailed descriptions of protocols that allow them to be reproduced easily. The background information provided enables researchers to understand the principles underlying the methods; other helpful sections include comparisons of alternative methods giving the advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, guidance on avoiding potential pitfalls, and suggestions for troubleshooting.