Cleaving the way for heterologous peptide production: An overview of cleavage strategies.

IF 4.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Methods Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.12.002
Karen Ofuji Osiro, Harry Morales Duque, Kamila Botelho Sampaio de Oliveira, Nadielle Tamires Moreira Melo, Letícia Ferreira Lima, Hugo Costa Paes, Octavio Luiz Franco
{"title":"Cleaving the way for heterologous peptide production: An overview of cleavage strategies.","authors":"Karen Ofuji Osiro, Harry Morales Duque, Kamila Botelho Sampaio de Oliveira, Nadielle Tamires Moreira Melo, Letícia Ferreira Lima, Hugo Costa Paes, Octavio Luiz Franco","doi":"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the main bottlenecks for recombinant peptide production is choosing the proper cleavage method to remove fusion protein tags from target peptides. While these tags are crucial for inhibiting the activity of the target peptide during heterologous expression, incorporating a cleavage site is essential for their later removal, ensuring the pure sequencing of the peptide. This review evaluates different cleavage methods, including protease-mediated, self-cleavable protein, and chemical-mediated sites, regarding their advantages and limitations. For instance, intein, N<sup>pro</sup> EDDIE, enterokinase, factor Xa, SUMO, and CNBr are options for residue-free cleavage. Although protease-mediated cleavage is widely used, it can be expensive, due to its own cost added to the whole process. As an alternative, self-cleavable sites eliminate the requirement for proteinases. Another crucial step in defining the proper cleavage method is cost consideration, which relates to the purpose of peptide production. Here, we explore a range of cleavage approaches, meeting the needs of both cost-constrained applications and a more flexible budget. Overall, selecting the most suitable cleavage method should be based on careful consideration of toxicity, cost, accuracy, and specific application requirements to ensure a state-of-the-art approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":390,"journal":{"name":"Methods","volume":" ","pages":"36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.12.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main bottlenecks for recombinant peptide production is choosing the proper cleavage method to remove fusion protein tags from target peptides. While these tags are crucial for inhibiting the activity of the target peptide during heterologous expression, incorporating a cleavage site is essential for their later removal, ensuring the pure sequencing of the peptide. This review evaluates different cleavage methods, including protease-mediated, self-cleavable protein, and chemical-mediated sites, regarding their advantages and limitations. For instance, intein, Npro EDDIE, enterokinase, factor Xa, SUMO, and CNBr are options for residue-free cleavage. Although protease-mediated cleavage is widely used, it can be expensive, due to its own cost added to the whole process. As an alternative, self-cleavable sites eliminate the requirement for proteinases. Another crucial step in defining the proper cleavage method is cost consideration, which relates to the purpose of peptide production. Here, we explore a range of cleavage approaches, meeting the needs of both cost-constrained applications and a more flexible budget. Overall, selecting the most suitable cleavage method should be based on careful consideration of toxicity, cost, accuracy, and specific application requirements to ensure a state-of-the-art approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods
Methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
2.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
11.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Methods focuses on rapidly developing techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences. Each topical issue, organized by a guest editor who is an expert in the area covered, consists solely of invited quality articles by specialist authors, many of them reviews. Issues are devoted to specific technical approaches with emphasis on clear detailed descriptions of protocols that allow them to be reproduced easily. The background information provided enables researchers to understand the principles underlying the methods; other helpful sections include comparisons of alternative methods giving the advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, guidance on avoiding potential pitfalls, and suggestions for troubleshooting.
期刊最新文献
Nanotechnological approaches to improve corticosteroids ocular therapy. Validation of plasmonic-based biosensors for rapid and in depth characterization of monoclonal antibodies directed against rabbit haemorrhagic and foot-and-mouth disease viruses in biological samples. CHiTA: A scarless High-Throughput pipeline for characterization of ribozymes. Cleaving the way for heterologous peptide production: An overview of cleavage strategies. Terahertz-based biosensors for biomedical applications: A review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1