Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2023-213851
Joanne E Coster, Fiona C Sampson, Rachel O'Hara, Jaqui Long, Fiona Bell, Steve Goodacre
{"title":"Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians.","authors":"Joanne E Coster, Fiona C Sampson, Rachel O'Hara, Jaqui Long, Fiona Bell, Steve Goodacre","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambulance clinicians use pre-alert calls to inform emergency departments (EDs) about the arrival of critically ill patients. However, there is variation in guidance between local ambulance service policies in terms of what should be pre-alerted and how pre-alerts should happen. We conducted a national online survey to understand the use of ambulance pre-alerts and to inform recommendations for practice and guidance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ambulance clinicians in England involved in pre-alert decision-making were recruited via ambulance trusts and social media to complete an anonymous online survey conducted during May-July 2023. Quantitative data was analysed descriptively using SPSS (version 28) and free-text responses are reported to illustrate the quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1298 valid responses from 10 English ambulance services. There was variation in practice at all stages of the pre-alert process, including the reported frequency of pre-alert (7.1% several times a shift, 14.9% once/two times per month). Most respondents reported that pre-alerts were delivered directly to the ED, but 32.8% reported pre-alerting via an ambulance control room. A third of respondents always used mnemonics to guide a pre-alert (eg, ATMIST (Age, Time of Incident, Mechanism of injury, Injuries, Signs, Treatments)), but 10.2% reported not using any fixed format.The type of guidance used to identify patients for pre-alert varied between clinicians and ambulance services, with local ambulance service guidance being most commonly used, and 20% stating they never use national guidelines. Respondents reported variable understanding of appropriate conditions for pre-alert, with paramedic students particularly wanted further guidance on trauma in older patients and medical pre-alerts. 29% of respondents reported receiving specific pre-alert training, while 50% reported never receiving feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified variation in pre-alert processes and practices that may result in uncertainty and challenges for ambulance clinicians providing time-critical care. Guidance and training on the use of pre-alerts may promote more consistent processes and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ambulance clinicians use pre-alert calls to inform emergency departments (EDs) about the arrival of critically ill patients. However, there is variation in guidance between local ambulance service policies in terms of what should be pre-alerted and how pre-alerts should happen. We conducted a national online survey to understand the use of ambulance pre-alerts and to inform recommendations for practice and guidance.

Methods: Ambulance clinicians in England involved in pre-alert decision-making were recruited via ambulance trusts and social media to complete an anonymous online survey conducted during May-July 2023. Quantitative data was analysed descriptively using SPSS (version 28) and free-text responses are reported to illustrate the quantitative findings.

Results: We included 1298 valid responses from 10 English ambulance services. There was variation in practice at all stages of the pre-alert process, including the reported frequency of pre-alert (7.1% several times a shift, 14.9% once/two times per month). Most respondents reported that pre-alerts were delivered directly to the ED, but 32.8% reported pre-alerting via an ambulance control room. A third of respondents always used mnemonics to guide a pre-alert (eg, ATMIST (Age, Time of Incident, Mechanism of injury, Injuries, Signs, Treatments)), but 10.2% reported not using any fixed format.The type of guidance used to identify patients for pre-alert varied between clinicians and ambulance services, with local ambulance service guidance being most commonly used, and 20% stating they never use national guidelines. Respondents reported variable understanding of appropriate conditions for pre-alert, with paramedic students particularly wanted further guidance on trauma in older patients and medical pre-alerts. 29% of respondents reported receiving specific pre-alert training, while 50% reported never receiving feedback.

Conclusion: We identified variation in pre-alert processes and practices that may result in uncertainty and challenges for ambulance clinicians providing time-critical care. Guidance and training on the use of pre-alerts may promote more consistent processes and practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
救护车预警过程和实践的变化:救护车临床医生的横断面调查。
背景:救护车临床医生使用预警呼叫通知急诊科(EDs)关于危重病人的到来。然而,当地救护车服务政策之间的指导存在差异,就应该预先警报的内容以及如何进行预先警报而言。我们进行了一项全国在线调查,以了解救护车预警的使用情况,并为实践和指导提供建议。方法:通过救护车信托和社交媒体招募英国参与预警决策的救护车临床医生,完成一项于2023年5月至7月进行的匿名在线调查。定量数据进行描述性分析,使用SPSS(版本28)和自由文本响应报告,以说明定量结果。结果:我们纳入了来自10家英国救护车服务机构的1298份有效回复。在预警过程的所有阶段,实践中存在差异,包括报告的预警频率(7.1%每班多次,14.9%每月一次/两次)。大多数受访者报告说,预先警报是直接送到急诊科的,但32.8%的受访者报告说,通过救护车控制室预先警报。三分之一的受访者总是使用助记符来指导预警(例如,ATMIST(年龄、事件时间、损伤机制、损伤、体征、治疗)),但10.2%的受访者报告不使用任何固定格式。用于确定患者预警的指南类型因临床医生和救护车服务而异,当地救护车服务指南是最常用的,20%的人表示他们从不使用国家指南。答复者报告了对适当的预警条件的不同理解,护理专业的学生特别希望在老年患者的创伤和医疗预警方面得到进一步的指导。29%的受访者表示接受了具体的预警培训,而50%的受访者表示从未收到反馈。结论:我们确定了预警过程和实践的变化,这可能导致救护车临床医生提供时间关键护理的不确定性和挑战。关于使用预警的指导和培训可促进更一致的进程和做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing paramedic conveyance decisions when attending children with minor head injury: a qualitative study. Outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in nursing and care homes: a cohort study. Knowledge of initial management of caustic ingestions: a national survey of emergency physicians in France. Oral tranexamic acid for immediate use in major trauma: implications for mass casualty events. They called it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1