Pub Date : 2025-01-22DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214402
Sriram Ramgopal, Remle P Crowe, Christopher M Horvat, Michelle L Macy, Rebecca E Cash, Robert J Sepanski, Christian Martin-Gill
{"title":"Prehospital vital sign abnormalities and in-hospital outcomes in children.","authors":"Sriram Ramgopal, Remle P Crowe, Christopher M Horvat, Michelle L Macy, Rebecca E Cash, Robert J Sepanski, Christian Martin-Gill","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214402","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214402","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143028133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-22DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214448
Svenja L Haak, Thea van der Veen, Renate Stolmeijer, Annemieke E Boendermaker, Brigitta Britt Ym van der Kolk, Jan C Ter Maaten, Ewoud Ter Avest, Heleen Lameijer
Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can potentially be used in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. However, the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS performed by non-radiologists for the exclusion of elbow fractures is yet unknown. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of POCUS of the posterior fatpad performed by non-radiologists in the workup of adult patients presenting with elbow injuries.
Methods: A multicentre, prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2021 and August 2022 in four EDs to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS to demonstrate or exclude an elbow fracture in patients presenting with elbow injuries to the ED. The study population consisted of a convenience sample. In patients ≥16 years of age with an elbow injury for which an X-ray was ordered, POCUS was performed by emergency physicians trained in ultrasound. POCUS (index test) results were compared with X-ray outcomes (reference standard) to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS.
Results: A total of 215 patients were included, 143 (67%) of whom had a fracture confirmed on X-ray. POCUS was positive based on a visualised elevated posterior fatpad in 127 (59%) patients. An elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CIs 85% to 95%), a specificity of 93% (95% CI 85% to 98%), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.16) and a positive likelihood ratio of 13.09 (95% CI 5.61 to 30.54) for the presence of an elbow fracture. Post hoc review of the images by expert sonographers improved sensitivity to 96% (95% CI 91% to 99%).
Conclusion: POCUS of the posterior fatpad is a promising adjunct to physical examination to determine the need for further diagnostic studies in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. Sensitivity after a limited training is high, but not perfect, and can likely further be improved with additional training.
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound of the posterior fatpad in elbow fractures.","authors":"Svenja L Haak, Thea van der Veen, Renate Stolmeijer, Annemieke E Boendermaker, Brigitta Britt Ym van der Kolk, Jan C Ter Maaten, Ewoud Ter Avest, Heleen Lameijer","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214448","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214448","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can potentially be used in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. However, the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS performed by non-radiologists for the exclusion of elbow fractures is yet unknown. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of POCUS of the posterior fatpad performed by non-radiologists in the workup of adult patients presenting with elbow injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre, prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2021 and August 2022 in four EDs to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS to demonstrate or exclude an elbow fracture in patients presenting with elbow injuries to the ED. The study population consisted of a convenience sample. In patients ≥16 years of age with an elbow injury for which an X-ray was ordered, POCUS was performed by emergency physicians trained in ultrasound. POCUS (index test) results were compared with X-ray outcomes (reference standard) to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 215 patients were included, 143 (67%) of whom had a fracture confirmed on X-ray. POCUS was positive based on a visualised elevated posterior fatpad in 127 (59%) patients. An elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CIs 85% to 95%), a specificity of 93% (95% CI 85% to 98%), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.16) and a positive likelihood ratio of 13.09 (95% CI 5.61 to 30.54) for the presence of an elbow fracture. Post hoc review of the images by expert sonographers improved sensitivity to 96% (95% CI 91% to 99%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS of the posterior fatpad is a promising adjunct to physical examination to determine the need for further diagnostic studies in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. Sensitivity after a limited training is high, but not perfect, and can likely further be improved with additional training.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143028211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214135
Giles N Cattermole, Colin A Graham
{"title":"Correspondence on 'Triage in major incidents: development and external validation of novel machine learning-derived primary and secondary triage tools' by Xu <i>et al</i>.","authors":"Giles N Cattermole, Colin A Graham","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214135","DOIUrl":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214135","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142812333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214176
Andrea Portoraro, Giorgia Vallicelli, Andrea Strada, Gabriele Farina, Roberto De Giorgio, Simona Rosa, Davide Golinelli, Roberto Grilli
Background: Extreme weather events due to human activities have significantly increased the frequency and severity of hydrological disasters like floods, impacting human health and healthcare systems worldwide. This study analyses the patterns of emergency service utilisation of the May 2023 flood in Romagna, Italy, and specifically investigates the differences in emergency department (ED) visits and mortality between individuals exposed and not exposed to the flood.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 813 724 citizens of Romagna, Italy, from 15 May to 31 August 2023 (ie, 14 weeks after flood inception). The study differentiated between individuals in flood-affected (exposed) and non-affected (unexposed) areas, assessing ED visit rates (overall and by disease category), hospitalisation odds and mortality. Data were analysed using multivariate regression models, adjusting for demographic variables, comorbidities and social frailty, assessed using the Deprivation Index.
Results: Of the study population, 586 437 were exposed to the flood, while 227 287 were not exposed. ED visits totalled 33 331 for those exposed to the flood and 13 185 for the unexposed group. Overall, 27 527 (4.7%) of those in the exposed group and 10 829 (4.8%) in the unexposed group experienced at least one ED visit (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.01). Frequency of access with severe triage scores was higher among those exposed as well as rate of hospitalisation after ED visit. Among those exposed, the rate of ED admission was lower for ophthalmology diseases (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.77 to 0.92) and general disorders and minor problems (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93), and higher for trauma (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.36) and mental health disorders (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.75). Exposed individuals had a slightly increased risk of death in the subsequent weeks (OR: 1.09; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.19).
Conclusion: The May 2023 flood in Romagna revealed enhanced vulnerability of the directly affected population, as shown by higher acuity ED presentations and subsequent hospitalisations, as well as more visits for trauma and mental health.
背景:人类活动导致的极端天气事件显著增加了洪水等水文灾害的频率和严重程度,影响了全球人类健康和医疗保健系统。本研究分析了2023年5月意大利罗马涅洪水的应急服务利用模式,并具体调查了暴露于洪水和未暴露于洪水的个体在急诊室(ED)访问量和死亡率方面的差异。方法:从2023年5月15日至8月31日(即洪水开始后14周),对意大利罗马涅813724名市民进行回顾性队列研究。该研究区分了受洪水影响(暴露)和未受影响(未暴露)地区的个体,评估了急诊科就诊率(总体和按疾病类别)、住院几率和死亡率。使用多变量回归模型分析数据,调整人口变量、合并症和社会脆弱性,使用剥夺指数进行评估。结果:在研究人群中,586 437人暴露于洪水,227 287人未暴露。受水浸组的急诊科探访人次为33 331人次,而未受水浸组的急诊科探访人次为13 185人次。总体而言,暴露组的27527人(4.7%)和未暴露组的10829人(4.8%)至少经历了一次急诊科就诊(OR 0.98;95% CI 0.96 ~ 1.01)。在暴露者中,严重分诊得分的就诊频率以及急诊科就诊后的住院率较高。在暴露者中,眼科疾病的ED入院率较低(OR 0.84;95% CI 0.77 - 0.92)和一般疾病和轻微问题(OR 0.85;95% CI 0.78 ~ 0.93),创伤组更高(OR 1.22;95% CI 1.09 - 1.36)和精神健康障碍(OR 1.40;95% CI 1.17 ~ 1.75)。暴露个体在随后几周内的死亡风险略有增加(OR: 1.09;95% CI 1.00 - 1.19)。结论:2023年5月罗马涅的洪水揭示了直接受影响人群的脆弱性增强,表现为更高的急症表现和随后的住院治疗,以及更多的创伤和心理健康就诊。
{"title":"Use of emergency services in response to a flood: an account of the aftermath of the May 2023 flood in Romagna, Italy.","authors":"Andrea Portoraro, Giorgia Vallicelli, Andrea Strada, Gabriele Farina, Roberto De Giorgio, Simona Rosa, Davide Golinelli, Roberto Grilli","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214176","DOIUrl":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extreme weather events due to human activities have significantly increased the frequency and severity of hydrological disasters like floods, impacting human health and healthcare systems worldwide. This study analyses the patterns of emergency service utilisation of the May 2023 flood in Romagna, Italy, and specifically investigates the differences in emergency department (ED) visits and mortality between individuals exposed and not exposed to the flood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 813 724 citizens of Romagna, Italy, from 15 May to 31 August 2023 (ie, 14 weeks after flood inception). The study differentiated between individuals in flood-affected (exposed) and non-affected (unexposed) areas, assessing ED visit rates (overall and by disease category), hospitalisation odds and mortality. Data were analysed using multivariate regression models, adjusting for demographic variables, comorbidities and social frailty, assessed using the Deprivation Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the study population, 586 437 were exposed to the flood, while 227 287 were not exposed. ED visits totalled 33 331 for those exposed to the flood and 13 185 for the unexposed group. Overall, 27 527 (4.7%) of those in the exposed group and 10 829 (4.8%) in the unexposed group experienced at least one ED visit (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.01). Frequency of access with severe triage scores was higher among those exposed as well as rate of hospitalisation after ED visit. Among those exposed, the rate of ED admission was lower for ophthalmology diseases (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.77 to 0.92) and general disorders and minor problems (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93), and higher for trauma (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.36) and mental health disorders (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.75). Exposed individuals had a slightly increased risk of death in the subsequent weeks (OR: 1.09; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The May 2023 flood in Romagna revealed enhanced vulnerability of the directly affected population, as shown by higher acuity ED presentations and subsequent hospitalisations, as well as more visits for trauma and mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"124-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142823628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214820
Spyridon Karageorgos, Anastasia Spartinou, Eleni Tasika, Eirini Trachanatzi, Christos Batsis, Maria Stratinaki, George Notas, Daniel Darbyshire
{"title":"Journal update monthly top five.","authors":"Spyridon Karageorgos, Anastasia Spartinou, Eleni Tasika, Eirini Trachanatzi, Christos Batsis, Maria Stratinaki, George Notas, Daniel Darbyshire","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214820","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214820","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":"42 2","pages":"141-142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143002262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214177
Rahul Batra, Edward Blandford, Raghavendran Kulasegaran-Shylini, Matthias E Futschik, Abbie Bown, Matthew Catton, Hermione Conti-Frith, Alexandra Alexandridou, Rebecca Gill, Clara Milroy, Sean Harper, Holly Gettings, Maryann Noronha, Hooi-Ling Harrison, Sam Douthwaite, Gaia Nebbia, Paul E Klapper, Sarah Tunkel, Richard Vipond, Susan Hopkins, Tom Fowler
Background: Rapid identification of individuals with acute respiratory infections is crucial for preventing nosocomial infections. For rapid diagnosis, especially in EDs, lateral flow devices (LFDs) are a convenient, inexpensive option with a rapid turnaround. Several 'multiplex' LFDs (M-LFDs) now exist, testing for multiple pathogens from a single swab sample. We evaluated the real-world performance of M-LFD versus PCR testing in detecting influenza A, B and SARS-CoV-2) in the ED setting.
Methods: After preliminary evaluation of an M-LFD (SureScreen) with laboratory-grown virus and PCR-negative clinical samples, it was evaluated in a real-world setting at the ED of St Thomas' Hospital (London, UK) from 1 December 2022 to 21 April 2023. Eligible participants were ≥18 years of age, admitted with respiratory symptoms and received concurrent M-LFD and PCR tests. Main endpoints were sensitivity to detect influenza A/B (primary) and SARS-CoV-2 (secondary) versus PCR. The probability of a true positive in relation to viral concentration (expressed as PCR cycle threshold (Ct)) was analysed using logistic regression.
Results: In total, 808 symptomatic participants were included (49.8% female; mean age 46.9 years). Test sensitivity (95% CI) was 67.0% (56.9% to 76.1%) for influenza A (n=100), 94.1% (71.3% to 99.9%) for influenza B (n=17) and 48.2% (39.7% to 56.8%) for SARS-CoV-2 (n=141). Sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 was significantly lower than that for influenza A and B (p=0.0057 and p=0.00088, respectively). The probability of a true positive was 98% for Ct<25 for influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 (influenza B non-evaluable). No co-infections were identified by PCR or M-LFD.
Conclusion: The real-world performance of SureScreen M-LFD was consistent with laboratory evaluation and achieved a high sensitivity for individuals with high viral concentration, most likely to be infectious. Given the representative UK population sample, results could be generalised for use in other settings.
{"title":"Multiplex lateral flow test sensitivity and specificity in detecting influenza A, B and SARS-CoV-2 in adult patients in a UK emergency department.","authors":"Rahul Batra, Edward Blandford, Raghavendran Kulasegaran-Shylini, Matthias E Futschik, Abbie Bown, Matthew Catton, Hermione Conti-Frith, Alexandra Alexandridou, Rebecca Gill, Clara Milroy, Sean Harper, Holly Gettings, Maryann Noronha, Hooi-Ling Harrison, Sam Douthwaite, Gaia Nebbia, Paul E Klapper, Sarah Tunkel, Richard Vipond, Susan Hopkins, Tom Fowler","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214177","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid identification of individuals with acute respiratory infections is crucial for preventing nosocomial infections. For rapid diagnosis, especially in EDs, lateral flow devices (LFDs) are a convenient, inexpensive option with a rapid turnaround. Several 'multiplex' LFDs (M-LFDs) now exist, testing for multiple pathogens from a single swab sample. We evaluated the real-world performance of M-LFD versus PCR testing in detecting influenza A, B and SARS-CoV-2) in the ED setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After preliminary evaluation of an M-LFD (SureScreen) with laboratory-grown virus and PCR-negative clinical samples, it was evaluated in a real-world setting at the ED of St Thomas' Hospital (London, UK) from 1 December 2022 to 21 April 2023. Eligible participants were ≥18 years of age, admitted with respiratory symptoms and received concurrent M-LFD and PCR tests. Main endpoints were sensitivity to detect influenza A/B (primary) and SARS-CoV-2 (secondary) versus PCR. The probability of a true positive in relation to viral concentration (expressed as PCR cycle threshold (Ct)) was analysed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 808 symptomatic participants were included (49.8% female; mean age 46.9 years). Test sensitivity (95% CI) was 67.0% (56.9% to 76.1%) for influenza A (n=100), 94.1% (71.3% to 99.9%) for influenza B (n=17) and 48.2% (39.7% to 56.8%) for SARS-CoV-2 (n=141). Sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 was significantly lower than that for influenza A and B (p=0.0057 and p=0.00088, respectively). The probability of a true positive was 98% for Ct<25 for influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 (influenza B non-evaluable). No co-infections were identified by PCR or M-LFD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The real-world performance of SureScreen M-LFD was consistent with laboratory evaluation and achieved a high sensitivity for individuals with high viral concentration, most likely to be infectious. Given the representative UK population sample, results could be generalised for use in other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":"42 2","pages":"98-104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143002264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214587
Alexander Hunt, Niall Pumfrey
A short systematic review was undertaken to assess whether intradermal sterile water injections (ISWI) provide effective pain relief in adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with renal colic. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were searched, identifying seven relevant studies. Study information, patient characteristics, key results and methodological weaknesses were tabulated. Our results indicate that ISWI provides rapid and effective pain relief within the first 15-30 min, comparable to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with fewer adverse effects. The short follow-up periods, exclusion of more comorbid patients and variability in study design limit the generalisability of the findings. Further research is needed to establish the long-term effectiveness of ISWI in the management of renal colic in the ED.
{"title":"Best evidence topic report: can intradermal sterile water injections provide effective pain relief in patients with renal colic?","authors":"Alexander Hunt, Niall Pumfrey","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214587","DOIUrl":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214587","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A short systematic review was undertaken to assess whether intradermal sterile water injections (ISWI) provide effective pain relief in adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with renal colic. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were searched, identifying seven relevant studies. Study information, patient characteristics, key results and methodological weaknesses were tabulated. Our results indicate that ISWI provides rapid and effective pain relief within the first 15-30 min, comparable to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with fewer adverse effects. The short follow-up periods, exclusion of more comorbid patients and variability in study design limit the generalisability of the findings. Further research is needed to establish the long-term effectiveness of ISWI in the management of renal colic in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"138-140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142681171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213442
Flavio Ayala-Diaz, Ben Harris-Roxas, Mark Harris, Margo Barr, A Y M Alamgir Kabir, Damian P Conway, Anurag Sharma
Background: Growing numbers of avoidable low-acuity visits to emergency departments (ED) are a major health policy concern globally and are thought to contribute to ED crowding. This study explores the differences in the utilisation of low-acuity ED visits between culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) migrants and English-speaking background (ESB) population.
Methods: A study based on a cross-sectional survey of individuals aged 45 or over linked to routinely collected ED visit records in New South Wales. We employed a negative binomial regression model to compare the number of yearly low-acuity ED visits between individuals from ESB and CaLD backgrounds after adjusting for relevant health-related and sociodemographic characteristics.
Results: We analysed 227 681 individuals with a mean age of 61, two-thirds of whom came from an ESB. Among individuals with a CaLD background, only those born in Australia had comparable rates of low-acuity ED visits as those with an ESB. In contrast, individuals with CaLD backgrounds who were born overseas were significantly less likely to make low-acuity visits to the ED compared with those from an ESB irrespective of year of arrival-for those who had migrated less than 20 years ago (relative risk (RR) 0.72, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.83) and those who migrated more than 20 years ago (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.95).
Conclusion: Foreign-born migrants aged 45 and over from CaLD backgrounds tend to have the lowest rates of low-acuity ED visits, particularly those who migrated more recently indicating low-acuity visits by CaLD patients are unlikely to contribute to ED crowding.
背景:急诊科(ED)可避免的低急性就诊人数不断增加是全球卫生政策关注的主要问题,并被认为是造成急诊科拥挤的原因之一。本研究探讨了不同文化和语言背景(CaLD)的移民与英语背景(ESB)人群在利用急诊科低急性就诊率方面的差异:研究基于一项横断面调查,调查对象为新南威尔士州 45 岁或以上的个人,并与常规收集的急诊室就诊记录相联系。我们采用负二项回归模型,在对相关健康相关特征和社会人口特征进行调整后,比较了 ESB 和 CaLD 背景人群每年低急性 ED 就诊次数:我们分析了 227 681 名平均年龄为 61 岁的患者,其中三分之二来自 ESB。在具有 CaLD 背景的人群中,只有那些出生在澳大利亚的人的低急性 ED 就诊率与具有 ESB 背景的人相当。相比之下,在海外出生的有CaLD背景的人与来自ESB的人相比,无论其抵达年份如何,到急诊室就诊的低急性病就诊率都要低很多--移民时间不足20年的人相对风险(RR)为0.72,95% CI为0.62至0.83;移民时间超过20年的人相对风险(RR)为0.91,95% CI为0.88至0.95:结论:45 岁及以上具有 CaLD 背景的外国出生移民的低急性 ED 就诊率往往最低,尤其是那些移民时间较近的人,这表明 CaLD 患者的低急性就诊不太可能造成 ED 拥挤。
{"title":"Are there differences in low-acuity emergency department visits between culturally and linguistically diverse migrants and people with English-speaking background: a population-based linkage study of adults over 45.","authors":"Flavio Ayala-Diaz, Ben Harris-Roxas, Mark Harris, Margo Barr, A Y M Alamgir Kabir, Damian P Conway, Anurag Sharma","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213442","DOIUrl":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213442","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growing numbers of avoidable low-acuity visits to emergency departments (ED) are a major health policy concern globally and are thought to contribute to ED crowding. This study explores the differences in the utilisation of low-acuity ED visits between culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) migrants and English-speaking background (ESB) population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study based on a cross-sectional survey of individuals aged 45 or over linked to routinely collected ED visit records in New South Wales. We employed a negative binomial regression model to compare the number of yearly low-acuity ED visits between individuals from ESB and CaLD backgrounds after adjusting for relevant health-related and sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analysed 227 681 individuals with a mean age of 61, two-thirds of whom came from an ESB. Among individuals with a CaLD background, only those born in Australia had comparable rates of low-acuity ED visits as those with an ESB. In contrast, individuals with CaLD backgrounds who were born overseas were significantly less likely to make low-acuity visits to the ED compared with those from an ESB irrespective of year of arrival-for those who had migrated less than 20 years ago (relative risk (RR) 0.72, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.83) and those who migrated more than 20 years ago (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Foreign-born migrants aged 45 and over from CaLD backgrounds tend to have the lowest rates of low-acuity ED visits, particularly those who migrated more recently indicating low-acuity visits by CaLD patients are unlikely to contribute to ED crowding.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"117-123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214743
Ellen J Weber, Richard Body
{"title":"Sex and gender reporting in scientific papers now strongly recommended by the Emergency Medicine Journal.","authors":"Ellen J Weber, Richard Body","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214743","DOIUrl":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214743","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"80-81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}