Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2025-215578
Lucy Morris, Sarah Edwards
{"title":"Footprint of social prescribing in emergency medicine in the UK.","authors":"Lucy Morris, Sarah Edwards","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2025-215578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215578","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2025-215451
Joanne Griggs, Jenny Harris, Jack Barrett, Scott Clarke, John O'Neill, Leigh Curtis, Malcolm Tunnicliff, Claire Baker, Duncan Bootland, Emma Ream, Richard Lyon
Background: Survival benefit of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) attended major trauma remains inadequately quantified across injury severity. We evaluated HEMS performance and identified predictors of survival.
Methods: Retrospective observational analysis of 3225 trauma patients attended by a regional HEMS in South-East England (2013-2022). Survival was assessed using W-statistic (Ws ) methodology stratified by probability of survival (Ps ) bands. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of 30-day mortality in major trauma (injury severity score (ISS) ≥15). Sub-analysis examined unexpected survival predictors and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates in traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA).
Results: Among 2125 patients meeting Ws analysis criteria, observed (O) 30-day survival exceeded expected (E) survival (84.7% vs 81.3%; O/E ratio 1.04), yielding adjusted Ws of 5.23 (95% CI 3.27 to 7.19), representing 5.23 excess survivors per 100 patients. Survival benefit was greatest in severely injured patients with moderate survival probability (Ps 25-45%: 3.33 excess survivors per 100, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.29). Among patients with low probability of survival (Ps <50), 38.7% survived unexpectedly; younger ages and higher presenting Glasgow Coma Scale scores were key predictors of unexpected survival. Pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia (PHEA) was independently associated with unexpected survival in this group (adjusted OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.72, p=0.023). TCA ROSC rates demonstrated an annual improvement (6.3% increased odds per year, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.10, p=0.002).
Conclusion: HEMS attendance to major trauma in this regional service was associated with survival exceeding case-mix adjusted predictions, and was most pronounced in severely injured patients. PHEA was associated with survival benefit in low probability patients, supporting the value of advanced pre-hospital interventions.
背景:直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)参与重大创伤的生存效益在损伤严重程度上仍然没有充分量化。我们评估了HEMS的表现并确定了生存的预测因素。方法:回顾性观察分析2013-2022年在英格兰东南部地区HEMS就诊的3225例创伤患者。生存率评估采用w -统计(Ws)方法,按生存概率(Ps)波段分层。多变量logistic回归确定了严重创伤患者30天死亡率的预测因素(损伤严重程度评分(ISS)≥15)。亚分析检查了外伤性心脏骤停(TCA)的意外生存预测因素和自发循环恢复(ROSC)率。结果:在符合Ws分析标准的2125例患者中,观察到的(O) 30天生存率超过了预期(E)生存率(84.7% vs 81.3%; O/E比1.04),调整后的Ws为5.23 (95% CI 3.27 ~ 7.19),每100例患者中有5.23例超额存活。中等生存概率的严重损伤患者的生存获益最大(Ps 25-45%:每100名幸存者中有3.33名,95% CI 1.37至5.29)。结论:在该地区服务中,HEMS对重大创伤的护理与超过病例组合调整预测的生存率相关,并且在严重受伤患者中最为明显。PHEA与低概率患者的生存获益相关,支持先进院前干预的价值。
{"title":"Helicopter Emergency Medical Services attendance is associated with favourable survival outcomes in major trauma: derivation and internal validation of prediction models in a regional trauma system.","authors":"Joanne Griggs, Jenny Harris, Jack Barrett, Scott Clarke, John O'Neill, Leigh Curtis, Malcolm Tunnicliff, Claire Baker, Duncan Bootland, Emma Ream, Richard Lyon","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2025-215451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survival benefit of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) attended major trauma remains inadequately quantified across injury severity. We evaluated HEMS performance and identified predictors of survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational analysis of 3225 trauma patients attended by a regional HEMS in South-East England (2013-2022). Survival was assessed using W-statistic (<i>W<sub>s</sub></i> ) methodology stratified by probability of survival (<i>P<sub>s</sub></i> ) bands. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of 30-day mortality in major trauma (injury severity score (ISS) ≥15). Sub-analysis examined unexpected survival predictors and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates in traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2125 patients meeting <i>W<sub>s</sub></i> analysis criteria, observed (O) 30-day survival exceeded expected (E) survival (84.7% vs 81.3%; O/E ratio 1.04), yielding adjusted <i>W<sub>s</sub></i> of 5.23 (95% CI 3.27 to 7.19), representing 5.23 excess survivors per 100 patients. Survival benefit was greatest in severely injured patients with moderate survival probability (<i>P<sub>s</sub></i> 25-45%: 3.33 excess survivors per 100, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.29). Among patients with low probability of survival (<i>P<sub>s</sub></i> <50), 38.7% survived unexpectedly; younger ages and higher presenting Glasgow Coma Scale scores were key predictors of unexpected survival. Pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia (PHEA) was independently associated with unexpected survival in this group (adjusted OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.72, p=0.023). TCA ROSC rates demonstrated an annual improvement (6.3% increased odds per year, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.10, p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HEMS attendance to major trauma in this regional service was associated with survival exceeding case-mix adjusted predictions, and was most pronounced in severely injured patients. PHEA was associated with survival benefit in low probability patients, supporting the value of advanced pre-hospital interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2025-215436
Siobhán Allison, Tom May, Jonathan Roberts, Rachel Hill-Tout, Stephen Hindle, Matthew Hickman, Lucy Yardley, Rachel Todd, Robyn Heath, Jeremy Horwood
Background: A significant challenge to achieving global 2030 elimination goals for blood-borne viruses (BBVs) is identifying undiagnosed individuals and relinking those who are no longer in care. To address this, the UK government has implemented opt-out BBV testing in emergency departments (EDs) to increase access to BBV testing in high prevalence areas. All adult ED patients having a routine blood test are automatically tested for HIV, hepatitis B and C, unless they opt out. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of ED opt-out BBV testing and provide recommendations for future rollouts.
Method: Semi-structured interviews with 23 staff members across five ED sites in very high HIV prevalence areas were analysed thematically, informed by Normalisation Process Theory.
Results: While there was some variation in staff knowledge and understanding of the programme, overall acceptance of the opt-out testing approach was found to be high. Training had a positive impact on staff understanding of the purpose of the intervention and the correct process, including the opt-out model. High workloads and competing priorities in EDs were significant barriers to testing. However, some specific systems and processes that facilitated the uptake of testing included automation and BBV champions. Giving the programme time to embed into practice and ensuring feedback loops and flexibility to 'tweak' the process was also essential to sustaining the programme.
Conclusion: To embed opt-out testing into emergency care, sites should implement automated test ordering, staff training, clear communication and dedicated champions, which can help to support earlier diagnosis, reduce inequalities and improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Staff perspectives on implementing opt-out blood-borne virus testing in English emergency departments: a qualitative study.","authors":"Siobhán Allison, Tom May, Jonathan Roberts, Rachel Hill-Tout, Stephen Hindle, Matthew Hickman, Lucy Yardley, Rachel Todd, Robyn Heath, Jeremy Horwood","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2025-215436","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215436","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant challenge to achieving global 2030 elimination goals for blood-borne viruses (BBVs) is identifying undiagnosed individuals and relinking those who are no longer in care. To address this, the UK government has implemented opt-out BBV testing in emergency departments (EDs) to increase access to BBV testing in high prevalence areas. All adult ED patients having a routine blood test are automatically tested for HIV, hepatitis B and C, unless they opt out. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of ED opt-out BBV testing and provide recommendations for future rollouts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with 23 staff members across five ED sites in very high HIV prevalence areas were analysed thematically, informed by Normalisation Process Theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While there was some variation in staff knowledge and understanding of the programme, overall acceptance of the opt-out testing approach was found to be high. Training had a positive impact on staff understanding of the purpose of the intervention and the correct process, including the opt-out model. High workloads and competing priorities in EDs were significant barriers to testing. However, some specific systems and processes that facilitated the uptake of testing included automation and BBV champions. Giving the programme time to embed into practice and ensuring feedback loops and flexibility to 'tweak' the process was also essential to sustaining the programme.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To embed opt-out testing into emergency care, sites should implement automated test ordering, staff training, clear communication and dedicated champions, which can help to support earlier diagnosis, reduce inequalities and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214386
Sophie Macdonald, Gareth Grier, Danë Goodsman, Sarah Morton
Background: Physician-based prehospital teams provide advanced critical care services in the UK (eg, prehospital anaesthesia). The last review of such teams in 2009, which included England, Wales and Northern Ireland, reported only one physician-based prehospital team available 24/7. Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) across the UK offer paid physician-based teams, while other organisations may provide physician-based teams on a voluntary ad hoc basis. The primary aim of this study was to determine if access to a physician-based HEMS team has changed in the past 12 years.
Methods: An online survey was distributed to all UK HEMS organisations in January 2024. The primary outcome measure was the number of physician-based teams operated by HEMS in 2024 and the operational hours of such teams. Secondary outcomes included interventions offered by HEMS teams and any additional medical teams offered (eg, paramedic only).
Results: All 21 HEMS responded. The number of potentially available physician-based HEMS teams has increased from 11 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in 2009 to 28 in 2024, with two services in Scotland (total=30). HEMS providing consistent 24/7 physician-based prehospital teams increased from one (5.9%) in 2009 to 11 (52.4%) in 2024. The East of England has the highest 24/7 availability, with Northern Ireland, South West England and Northern England the least. Within physician-based teams, variation remains in advanced interventions available-for example, 19 services (90.4%) offer blood transfusion while only one (4.7%) offers resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta. Only one service is completely government funded; the others are funded by charity alone or a combination of charity and government sources.
Conclusion: Both geographical and temporal variations in access to a physician-based HEMS remain across the UK, although there has been improvement since 2009. However, within this provision, variation exists in terms of interventions provided such as the provision of blood products.
{"title":"Access to physician-based Helicopter Emergency Medical Services in the UK: a service analysis in 2024.","authors":"Sophie Macdonald, Gareth Grier, Danë Goodsman, Sarah Morton","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician-based prehospital teams provide advanced critical care services in the UK (eg, prehospital anaesthesia). The last review of such teams in 2009, which included England, Wales and Northern Ireland, reported only one physician-based prehospital team available 24/7. Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) across the UK offer paid physician-based teams, while other organisations may provide physician-based teams on a voluntary ad hoc basis. The primary aim of this study was to determine if access to a physician-based HEMS team has changed in the past 12 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed to all UK HEMS organisations in January 2024. The primary outcome measure was the number of physician-based teams operated by HEMS in 2024 and the operational hours of such teams. Secondary outcomes included interventions offered by HEMS teams and any additional medical teams offered (eg, paramedic only).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 21 HEMS responded. The number of potentially available physician-based HEMS teams has increased from 11 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in 2009 to 28 in 2024, with two services in Scotland (total=30). HEMS providing consistent 24/7 physician-based prehospital teams increased from one (5.9%) in 2009 to 11 (52.4%) in 2024. The East of England has the highest 24/7 availability, with Northern Ireland, South West England and Northern England the least. Within physician-based teams, variation remains in advanced interventions available-for example, 19 services (90.4%) offer blood transfusion while only one (4.7%) offers resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta. Only one service is completely government funded; the others are funded by charity alone or a combination of charity and government sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both geographical and temporal variations in access to a physician-based HEMS remain across the UK, although there has been improvement since 2009. However, within this provision, variation exists in terms of interventions provided such as the provision of blood products.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214271
Leah Flanagan, Sinead Loughran, Bibi Ayesha Bassa, Grainne Colgan, Etimbuk Umana, Vinny Ramiah, Michael Mara
Background: Scaphoid fractures comprise approximately 50-70% of carpal bone fractures but can be difficult to detect on initial plain film radiographs. A delayed diagnosis can lead to a high rate of non-union, avascular necrosis and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Current literature supports cone beam CT (CBCT) (within 10-14 days) as an effective method for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. We implemented an early outpatient CBCT pathway, prior to specialist review, with the aim to increase the proportion of patients with suspected scaphoid fracture undergoing CBCT within 7 days.
Methods: We designed an ambulatory pathway for suspected scaphoid fractures in the Emergency Department (ED) in which outpatient CBCT was requested by emergency medicine clinicians. A retrospective audit of current management of these patients was performed between 1 August 2022 and 31 October 2022 (prepathway period). A list of patients who underwent CBCT performed for the indication 'suspected scaphoid or carpal bone fracture' in the hospital was obtained and screened. Implementation of the pathway took place in February 2023 and was reviewed by continuous audit monitoring from 1 March 2023 to 31 May 2023 (postpathway period).
Results: Prepathway implementation, 54 patients underwent CBCT. Following implementation of our pathway, the number of CBCTs performed in the hospital for this clinical indication increased to 111 (postpathway). The proportion of patients undergoing CBCT within 7 days increased from 11.1% (6/54) to 91.8% (102/111) (p<0.000). There was a 71.9% reduction in fracture clinic attendances (50/54 (92.6%) prepathway and 23/111 (22.5%) post pathway (p<0.000).
Conclusion: We successfully implemented an ambulatory pathway for suspected scaphoid fractures in the ED that significantly increased the proportion of patients with suspected scaphoid fractures undergoing early (<7 days) CBCT and definitive care.
{"title":"Reducing time from presentation to diagnosis of scaphoid fractures with cone beam CT: a before-and-after study.","authors":"Leah Flanagan, Sinead Loughran, Bibi Ayesha Bassa, Grainne Colgan, Etimbuk Umana, Vinny Ramiah, Michael Mara","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214271","DOIUrl":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scaphoid fractures comprise approximately 50-70% of carpal bone fractures but can be difficult to detect on initial plain film radiographs. A delayed diagnosis can lead to a high rate of non-union, avascular necrosis and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Current literature supports cone beam CT (CBCT) (within 10-14 days) as an effective method for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. We implemented an early outpatient CBCT pathway, prior to specialist review, with the aim to increase the proportion of patients with suspected scaphoid fracture undergoing CBCT within 7 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed an ambulatory pathway for suspected scaphoid fractures in the Emergency Department (ED) in which outpatient CBCT was requested by emergency medicine clinicians. A retrospective audit of current management of these patients was performed between 1 August 2022 and 31 October 2022 (prepathway period). A list of patients who underwent CBCT performed for the indication 'suspected scaphoid or carpal bone fracture' in the hospital was obtained and screened. Implementation of the pathway took place in February 2023 and was reviewed by continuous audit monitoring from 1 March 2023 to 31 May 2023 (postpathway period).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prepathway implementation, 54 patients underwent CBCT. Following implementation of our pathway, the number of CBCTs performed in the hospital for this clinical indication increased to 111 (postpathway). The proportion of patients undergoing CBCT within 7 days increased from 11.1% (6/54) to 91.8% (102/111) (p<0.000). There was a 71.9% reduction in fracture clinic attendances (50/54 (92.6%) prepathway and 23/111 (22.5%) post pathway (p<0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We successfully implemented an ambulatory pathway for suspected scaphoid fractures in the ED that significantly increased the proportion of patients with suspected scaphoid fractures undergoing early (<7 days) CBCT and definitive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145285729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214023
Louis Kirton, Julie Cook, Rowan Hamill, Tanira Kingi, Neakiry Kivi, Allie Eathorne, Alice Rogan, Mark Weatherall, Richard Beasley
Background: When delivering nasal high flow (NHF) therapy in a medical ward, a high dependency unit or an intensive care unit, automated oxygen titration increases time spent within a target oxygen saturation (SpO2) range compared with standard, manually titrated oxygen. This study explores whether this improvement is also seen when titrating oxygen with NHF in an emergency department (ED).
Method: This open-label, parallel groups, randomised controlled trial compared automated to manual oxygen titration using NHF therapy in hypoxaemic adult patients in the Wellington Regional Hospital ED between October 2022 and December 2023. Participants with a prescribed target SpO2 range who demonstrated a minimum oxygen requirement were eligible for inclusion. A rank-based comparison was used for the primary outcome, the proportion of time spent within the target SpO2 range of 92%-96%, or 88%-92% if at risk of hypercapnia, among participants achieving ≥30 min of therapy. An interaction term was applied to assess whether the proportion of time spent within target SpO2 range depended on the prescribed target range itself (SpO2 92%-96% or 88%-92%).
Results: 83 participants were screened, 52 were randomised and 49 had data for the primary endpoint. Median (IQR) proportion of time spent within the target SpO2 range with automated oxygen (n=25) was 96.4% (92.5% to 99.4%) compared with 89.9% (69.8% to 97.2%) with manually adjusted oxygen (n=24); difference (95% CI) 8.0% (1.7% to 16.9%), p=0.01. There was no evidence that the proportion of time spent within target SpO2 range depended on the selected target SpO2 range, P-interaction 0.60.
Conclusion: Automatically titrated oxygen therapy significantly increased time spent within a target SpO2 range, compared with manual oxygen titration in adult patients receiving NHF therapy in the ED.
{"title":"Automated titration of nasal high flow oxygen in the emergency department: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Louis Kirton, Julie Cook, Rowan Hamill, Tanira Kingi, Neakiry Kivi, Allie Eathorne, Alice Rogan, Mark Weatherall, Richard Beasley","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When delivering nasal high flow (NHF) therapy in a medical ward, a high dependency unit or an intensive care unit, automated oxygen titration increases time spent within a target oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) range compared with standard, manually titrated oxygen. This study explores whether this improvement is also seen when titrating oxygen with NHF in an emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This open-label, parallel groups, randomised controlled trial compared automated to manual oxygen titration using NHF therapy in hypoxaemic adult patients in the Wellington Regional Hospital ED between October 2022 and December 2023. Participants with a prescribed target SpO<sub>2</sub> range who demonstrated a minimum oxygen requirement were eligible for inclusion. A rank-based comparison was used for the primary outcome, the proportion of time spent within the target SpO<sub>2</sub> range of 92%-96%, or 88%-92% if at risk of hypercapnia, among participants achieving ≥30 min of therapy. An interaction term was applied to assess whether the proportion of time spent within target SpO<sub>2</sub> range depended on the prescribed target range itself (SpO<sub>2</sub> 92%-96% or 88%-92%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>83 participants were screened, 52 were randomised and 49 had data for the primary endpoint. Median (IQR) proportion of time spent within the target SpO<sub>2</sub> range with automated oxygen (n=25) was 96.4% (92.5% to 99.4%) compared with 89.9% (69.8% to 97.2%) with manually adjusted oxygen (n=24); difference (95% CI) 8.0% (1.7% to 16.9%), p=0.01. There was no evidence that the proportion of time spent within target SpO<sub>2</sub> range depended on the selected target SpO<sub>2</sub> range, P-interaction 0.60.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatically titrated oxygen therapy significantly increased time spent within a target SpO<sub>2</sub> range, compared with manual oxygen titration in adult patients receiving NHF therapy in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146092408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2025-215326
Ian Pope, Sarah Gentry, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Hassan Iqbal, Simrun Rashid, Chistopher Corbett, Caitlin Notley
Background: Emergency departments (EDs) offer a valuable opportunity to intervene to support people to quit smoking. We sought to determine the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions delivered in the ED setting on rates of abstinence at the longest follow-up.
Methods: We undertook a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines considering only randomised controlled trials (RCTs), based in the ED, where the goal of the intervention was smoking cessation and follow-up was at least 3 months. We systematically searched electronically published literature and trial registries from inception to May 2025. We pooled data using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model for behavioural interventions without pharmacotherapy, and using a fixed-effects model for interventions incorporating nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), with results reported as risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs. The primary outcome was smoking cessation using the strictest available measure, biochemically validated where possible. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Certainty of overall evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation).
Results: Nineteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, of which 17 were deemed suitable for incorporating into meta-analyses. Participants randomised to receive a smoking cessation intervention involving NRT in the ED were significantly more likely to achieve abstinence (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.89, p<0.0001, 6 RCTs, n=3528, I2=46%). Trials involving behavioural support alone delivered in the ED had an RR of quitting compared with controls of 1.18 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.64, p=0.32, 11 RCTs, N=4711, I2=37%). Of the 17 studies included in the meta-analyses, 14 were at high risk of bias, 1 at low risk and 2 where the risk was unclear. One study incorporated e-cigarettes and was not incorporated in the meta-analysis but demonstrated evidence of effectiveness.
Conclusion: There is moderate certainty evidence that smoking cessation interventions incorporating pharmacotherapy delivered in the ED are effective in supporting smoking cessation.
背景:急诊科(EDs)提供了一个宝贵的机会来干预,以支持人们戒烟。我们试图确定在ED环境中提供的戒烟干预措施在最长随访期间的戒烟率的有效性。方法:我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行了系统评价,仅考虑了基于ED的随机对照试验(rct),其中干预目标是戒烟,随访至少3个月。从开始到2025年5月,我们系统地检索了电子出版的文献和试验注册。我们使用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型对没有药物治疗的行为干预进行汇总,并使用固定效应模型对含有尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)的干预进行汇总,结果报告为风险比(RR)和95% ci。主要结果是使用最严格的可用测量方法戒烟,并在可能的情况下进行生化验证。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。使用GRADE(建议、评估、发展和评价分级)评估总体证据的确定性。结果:19项rct符合纳入标准,其中17项被认为适合纳入meta分析。在ED中随机接受包含NRT的戒烟干预的参与者更有可能实现戒烟(RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27至1.89,p2=46%)。在急症室单独提供行为支持的试验中,与对照组相比,戒烟的RR为1.18 (95% CI 0.85至1.64,p=0.32, 11项随机对照试验,N=4711, I2=37%)。在纳入meta分析的17项研究中,14项具有高偏倚风险,1项具有低偏倚风险,2项风险不明确。一项研究纳入了电子烟,但没有纳入荟萃分析,但证明了其有效性。结论:有中等确定性的证据表明,在急诊科进行的戒烟干预结合药物治疗对支持戒烟是有效的。
{"title":"Emergency department interventions for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ian Pope, Sarah Gentry, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Hassan Iqbal, Simrun Rashid, Chistopher Corbett, Caitlin Notley","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2025-215326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215326","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency departments (EDs) offer a valuable opportunity to intervene to support people to quit smoking. We sought to determine the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions delivered in the ED setting on rates of abstinence at the longest follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines considering only randomised controlled trials (RCTs), based in the ED, where the goal of the intervention was smoking cessation and follow-up was at least 3 months. We systematically searched electronically published literature and trial registries from inception to May 2025. We pooled data using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model for behavioural interventions without pharmacotherapy, and using a fixed-effects model for interventions incorporating nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), with results reported as risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs. The primary outcome was smoking cessation using the strictest available measure, biochemically validated where possible. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Certainty of overall evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, of which 17 were deemed suitable for incorporating into meta-analyses. Participants randomised to receive a smoking cessation intervention involving NRT in the ED were significantly more likely to achieve abstinence (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.89, p<0.0001, 6 RCTs, n=3528, I<sup>2</sup>=46%). Trials involving behavioural support alone delivered in the ED had an RR of quitting compared with controls of 1.18 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.64, p=0.32, 11 RCTs, N=4711, I<sup>2</sup>=37%). Of the 17 studies included in the meta-analyses, 14 were at high risk of bias, 1 at low risk and 2 where the risk was unclear. One study incorporated e-cigarettes and was not incorporated in the meta-analysis but demonstrated evidence of effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is moderate certainty evidence that smoking cessation interventions incorporating pharmacotherapy delivered in the ED are effective in supporting smoking cessation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146084907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2025-215118
Marco Mion, Rupert F G Simpson, Adam Pitcairn, Gareth Grier, Uzma Sajjad, Emma Beadle, Sinead Keane, Gui Movio, Haroun Butt, Abdalla Ibrahim, Maria Maccaroni, John Davies, Thomas R R Keeble, Matthew Snowsill
Introduction: Feedback is a vital yet underused tool for improving clinical outcomes in prehospital emergency care. This study aimed to develop and pilot a novel, theoretically grounded feedback mechanism for helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) clinicians involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the East of England, UK.
Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted in September 2022 with HEMS clinicians from Essex & Herts Air Ambulance, and the feedback process was co-designed with the Essex Cardiothoracic Centre (Essex, UK). Using the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour), we conducted qualitative interviews with prehospitalists (seven paramedics, three prehospital doctors) to explore gaps in existing feedback processes and identify their information needs, then iteratively co-developed a structured feedback proforma with stakeholders.
Results: Three themes emerged, specifically about weaknesses in current feedback and preferences for an improved system: (1) dissatisfaction with current ad hoc, 'punitive' approaches; (2) the educational and emotional importance of timely, targeted feedback; and (3) a strong preference for standardised, confidentiality-compliant delivery methods. The resulting feedback proforma included working diagnoses, key investigations completed, optimisation opportunities and patient outcomes (if already available), to be delivered within 24-48 hours of hospital admission.
Conclusions: Our study underscores the importance of stakeholder-driven development in shaping an effective prehospital feedback mechanism for OHCA aligned to clinicians' needs. By exploring feedback preferences and mapping insights onto the COM-B model, we highlight how knowledge, context and motivation can all steer behavioural change. Further research is needed in diverse emergency medical service contexts to test its impact on clinical practice and patient outcomes.
{"title":"Designing a theory-informed feedback system for prehospital cardiac arrest care: a qualitative study.","authors":"Marco Mion, Rupert F G Simpson, Adam Pitcairn, Gareth Grier, Uzma Sajjad, Emma Beadle, Sinead Keane, Gui Movio, Haroun Butt, Abdalla Ibrahim, Maria Maccaroni, John Davies, Thomas R R Keeble, Matthew Snowsill","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2025-215118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Feedback is a vital yet underused tool for improving clinical outcomes in prehospital emergency care. This study aimed to develop and pilot a novel, theoretically grounded feedback mechanism for helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) clinicians involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the East of England, UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted in September 2022 with HEMS clinicians from Essex & Herts Air Ambulance, and the feedback process was co-designed with the Essex Cardiothoracic Centre (Essex, UK). Using the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour), we conducted qualitative interviews with prehospitalists (seven paramedics, three prehospital doctors) to explore gaps in existing feedback processes and identify their information needs, then iteratively co-developed a structured feedback proforma with stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes emerged, specifically about weaknesses in current feedback and preferences for an improved system: (1) dissatisfaction with current ad hoc, 'punitive' approaches; (2) the educational and emotional importance of timely, targeted feedback; and (3) a strong preference for standardised, confidentiality-compliant delivery methods. The resulting feedback proforma included working diagnoses, key investigations completed, optimisation opportunities and patient outcomes (if already available), to be delivered within 24-48 hours of hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study underscores the importance of stakeholder-driven development in shaping an effective prehospital feedback mechanism for OHCA aligned to clinicians' needs. By exploring feedback preferences and mapping insights onto the COM-B model, we highlight how knowledge, context and motivation can all steer behavioural change. Further research is needed in diverse emergency medical service contexts to test its impact on clinical practice and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146060791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2025-215389
Rebecca Smith, Simon Carley, Romelle Mills-Moore
Objective: To evaluate whether intra-arrest diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) are associated with improved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in cardiac arrest.
Methods: A systematic search (PROSPERO registration: CRD420251042344) was conducted in English on EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from inception to 1 May 2025. Grey literature sources (trial registries, conference abstracts, Google Scholar) were searched. Key resuscitation experts were contacted to identify unpublished or ongoing studies. The search strategy was peer-reviewed using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies checklist. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) contributing cohort data, observational studies and case series (≥10 patients) monitoring intra-arrest DBP or CPP in adult patients with cardiac arrest managed in prehospital or emergency department settings. Study selection involved two reviewers independently screening titles and abstracts, and full-text articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools. This research received no funding.
Results: 15 studies (n=970 patients) across seven countries were included: 3 RCT-based prospective cohort studies and 12 observational studies. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity in study designs. Aziz et al identified a DBP threshold of 35 mm Hg associated with ROSC (p<0.001), reporting a 5% increase in ROSC odds for every 1 mm Hg rise in DBP. This finding was supported by other observational studies reporting significantly higher maximum DBP values in patients with ROSC (34-56.5 mm Hg) compared with those without ROSC. Interventional studies aimed at augmenting DBP or CPP-including resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta-generally reported increases in ROSC, though studies were underpowered and at high risk of bias.
Conclusions: This review demonstrates an association between intra-arrest DBP and CPP and ROSC. DBP may provide a feasible clinical target, but definitive thresholds and their impact on survival to hospital discharge remain undefined.
Prospero registration number: CRD420251042344.
目的:探讨心脏骤停时舒张压(DBP)和冠状动脉灌注压(CPP)与心脏骤停后自发性循环恢复(ROSC)的关系。方法:系统检索EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆自成立至2025年5月1日的英文文献(PROSPERO注册号:CRD420251042344)。检索灰色文献来源(试验登记、会议摘要、谷歌Scholar)。联系了关键的复苏专家,以确定未发表或正在进行的研究。检索策略使用电子检索策略检查表同行评审。符合条件的研究包括提供队列数据的随机对照试验(RCTs)、观察性研究和病例系列(≥10例患者),监测院前或急诊科处理的成年心脏骤停患者骤停时DBP或CPP。研究选择包括两位审稿人独立筛选标题、摘要和全文文章。使用Risk of bias 2和Risk of bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions工具评估偏倚风险。这项研究没有得到资助。结果:纳入了7个国家的15项研究(n=970例患者):3项基于随机对照试验的前瞻性队列研究和12项观察性研究。由于研究设计的异质性,未进行meta分析。Aziz等人确定了与ROSC相关的舒张压阈值为35 mm Hg(结论:这篇综述证明了骤停期间舒张压、CPP和ROSC之间的关联。舒张压可能提供一个可行的临床目标,但明确的阈值及其对出院前生存率的影响仍不明确。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD420251042344。
{"title":"Haemodynamic monitoring during cardiac arrest: a systematic review of diastolic blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure.","authors":"Rebecca Smith, Simon Carley, Romelle Mills-Moore","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2025-215389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether intra-arrest diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) are associated with improved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search (PROSPERO registration: CRD420251042344) was conducted in English on EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from inception to 1 May 2025. Grey literature sources (trial registries, conference abstracts, Google Scholar) were searched. Key resuscitation experts were contacted to identify unpublished or ongoing studies. The search strategy was peer-reviewed using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies checklist. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) contributing cohort data, observational studies and case series (≥10 patients) monitoring intra-arrest DBP or CPP in adult patients with cardiac arrest managed in prehospital or emergency department settings. Study selection involved two reviewers independently screening titles and abstracts, and full-text articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools. This research received no funding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 studies (n=970 patients) across seven countries were included: 3 RCT-based prospective cohort studies and 12 observational studies. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity in study designs. Aziz <i>et al</i> identified a DBP threshold of 35 mm Hg associated with ROSC (p<0.001), reporting a 5% increase in ROSC odds for every 1 mm Hg rise in DBP. This finding was supported by other observational studies reporting significantly higher maximum DBP values in patients with ROSC (34-56.5 mm Hg) compared with those without ROSC. Interventional studies aimed at augmenting DBP or CPP-including resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta-generally reported increases in ROSC, though studies were underpowered and at high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review demonstrates an association between intra-arrest DBP and CPP and ROSC. DBP may provide a feasible clinical target, but definitive thresholds and their impact on survival to hospital discharge remain undefined.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD420251042344.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146060827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2025-215742
Ryan McHenry, Marion Campbell, David Chung, David Blane, Alasdair R Corfield
{"title":"Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with redirection to other services from the emergency department: a multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ryan McHenry, Marion Campbell, David Chung, David Blane, Alasdair R Corfield","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2025-215742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215742","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146028839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}