Cameron J Kaminsky, Jericha Mill, Thomas Raife, Lingjun Li
{"title":"Quantitative Endogenous Polyamine Analysis via Capillary Electrophoresis/Mass Spectrometry: Characterization and Practical Considerations.","authors":"Cameron J Kaminsky, Jericha Mill, Thomas Raife, Lingjun Li","doi":"10.1002/elps.202400165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Commonly used analytical techniques for polyamine analysis, including derivatization and mixed-mode liquid chromatography (LC), have inherent disadvantages. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is uniquely suited to analyze small, highly charged molecules because analytes are separated on the basis of their electrophoretic mobility, not polarity or association with a stationary phase. Microfluidic CE-mass spectrometry (mCE-MS) is a relatively recent addition to commercially available CE offerings that streamlines traditional CE-MS interfacing and has the potential to improve upon classic CE challenges to robustness and reproducibility. MS instrument choice and scanning parameters are strongly influenced by a need for high acquisition rate to adequately sample CE peaks. Alternatively, isotachophoresis on loading can be intentionally avoided to produce sufficiently wide peaks. The mCE platform utilized here performed very well in many metrics; a limit of detection (LOD) as low as 0.25 ng/mL was achieved for spermidine, and endogenous spermidine was easily detected in blood with this method. Both of these are challenging tasks for any separation technique and demonstrate a strong use case for the platform. During experimentation, various idiosyncrasies in the commercial CE-MS interface resulted in extensive chip-to-chip variability in both peak shape and LOD, complicating the application to robust absolute quantitation. Practical guidance for similar analyses is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.202400165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Commonly used analytical techniques for polyamine analysis, including derivatization and mixed-mode liquid chromatography (LC), have inherent disadvantages. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is uniquely suited to analyze small, highly charged molecules because analytes are separated on the basis of their electrophoretic mobility, not polarity or association with a stationary phase. Microfluidic CE-mass spectrometry (mCE-MS) is a relatively recent addition to commercially available CE offerings that streamlines traditional CE-MS interfacing and has the potential to improve upon classic CE challenges to robustness and reproducibility. MS instrument choice and scanning parameters are strongly influenced by a need for high acquisition rate to adequately sample CE peaks. Alternatively, isotachophoresis on loading can be intentionally avoided to produce sufficiently wide peaks. The mCE platform utilized here performed very well in many metrics; a limit of detection (LOD) as low as 0.25 ng/mL was achieved for spermidine, and endogenous spermidine was easily detected in blood with this method. Both of these are challenging tasks for any separation technique and demonstrate a strong use case for the platform. During experimentation, various idiosyncrasies in the commercial CE-MS interface resulted in extensive chip-to-chip variability in both peak shape and LOD, complicating the application to robust absolute quantitation. Practical guidance for similar analyses is provided.
期刊介绍:
ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.).
Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences.
Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases.
Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered.
Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics:
• Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry
• Single cell and subcellular analysis
• Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS)
• Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing)
• Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation
• Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis
• Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.